A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC Tools

As a critical factor in determining a product’s success, users’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) tools is a key driver for their sustainable development. As a new productivity tool, AIGC tool adoption by design students is influenced by vari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiang Wang, Mingxing Li, Yu Yao, Xiaoyang Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2025-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11048922/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850115792823123968
author Xiang Wang
Mingxing Li
Yu Yao
Xiaoyang Zhu
author_facet Xiang Wang
Mingxing Li
Yu Yao
Xiaoyang Zhu
author_sort Xiang Wang
collection DOAJ
description As a critical factor in determining a product’s success, users’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) tools is a key driver for their sustainable development. As a new productivity tool, AIGC tool adoption by design students is influenced by various factors. However, there is a lack of systematic research on this topic in the academic community, which hinders the sustainable development of AIGC tools. Based on this, the study combines the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) models to construct a dual-perspective model—integrating “technology (external)” and “individual (internal)” dimensions—to investigate the key factors influencing design students’ willingness to adopt AIGC tools in their professional learning. A questionnaire was distributed to Chinese design students, resulting in 517 valid responses. The structural equation model (SEM) analysis yielded the following findings: Characteristics of AIGC Technology (CoAT) and students’ task characteristics positively influence task-technology fit. CoAT positively affect performance expectations (PE) but have no significant impact on effort expectations (EE). Task-technology fit positively influences use behaviors and performance expectations. Additionally, performance expectations, effort expectations, and social influences (SI) significantly enhance willingness to use, which in turn drives use behaviors (UB). Conversely, facilitating conditions (FC) do not affect use behaviors. Based on the empirical findings, this study discusses strategies for enhancing design students’ adoption of AIGC tools and provides recommendations for promoting their adoption and sustainability in design education.eing rejected by search engines.
format Article
id doaj-art-ca53d4c958ef49fa9ba1315c3de5e3e7
institution OA Journals
issn 2169-3536
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Access
spelling doaj-art-ca53d4c958ef49fa9ba1315c3de5e3e72025-08-20T02:36:30ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362025-01-011311775311777010.1109/ACCESS.2025.358259911048922A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC ToolsXiang Wang0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2819-6936Mingxing Li1Yu Yao2Xiaoyang Zhu3School of Art and Design, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Design, Shanghai Academy of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai, ChinaDesign and Craft Graduate School, Hongik University, Seoul, South KoreaSchool of Arts and Design, Sanming University, Sanming, ChinaAs a critical factor in determining a product’s success, users’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) tools is a key driver for their sustainable development. As a new productivity tool, AIGC tool adoption by design students is influenced by various factors. However, there is a lack of systematic research on this topic in the academic community, which hinders the sustainable development of AIGC tools. Based on this, the study combines the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) models to construct a dual-perspective model—integrating “technology (external)” and “individual (internal)” dimensions—to investigate the key factors influencing design students’ willingness to adopt AIGC tools in their professional learning. A questionnaire was distributed to Chinese design students, resulting in 517 valid responses. The structural equation model (SEM) analysis yielded the following findings: Characteristics of AIGC Technology (CoAT) and students’ task characteristics positively influence task-technology fit. CoAT positively affect performance expectations (PE) but have no significant impact on effort expectations (EE). Task-technology fit positively influences use behaviors and performance expectations. Additionally, performance expectations, effort expectations, and social influences (SI) significantly enhance willingness to use, which in turn drives use behaviors (UB). Conversely, facilitating conditions (FC) do not affect use behaviors. Based on the empirical findings, this study discusses strategies for enhancing design students’ adoption of AIGC tools and provides recommendations for promoting their adoption and sustainability in design education.eing rejected by search engines.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11048922/Artificial intelligencegenerative modelshuman computer interactioneducational technologyuser interfaces
spellingShingle Xiang Wang
Mingxing Li
Yu Yao
Xiaoyang Zhu
A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC Tools
IEEE Access
Artificial intelligence
generative models
human computer interaction
educational technology
user interfaces
title A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC Tools
title_full A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC Tools
title_fullStr A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC Tools
title_full_unstemmed A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC Tools
title_short A Study of Factors Influencing Chinese Design Students’ Adoption of AIGC Tools
title_sort study of factors influencing chinese design students x2019 adoption of aigc tools
topic Artificial intelligence
generative models
human computer interaction
educational technology
user interfaces
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11048922/
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangwang astudyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools
AT mingxingli astudyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools
AT yuyao astudyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools
AT xiaoyangzhu astudyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools
AT xiangwang studyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools
AT mingxingli studyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools
AT yuyao studyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools
AT xiaoyangzhu studyoffactorsinfluencingchinesedesignstudentsx2019adoptionofaigctools