Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration

Abstract Background The high prevalence and significant morbidity and mortality associated with chronic pain among veterans has made expansion of pain services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) a key priority. TelePain, in which services are provided via telehealth from central “hub” s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra L. Rose, Shaina Coogan, Jess Indresano, Steven B. Zeliadt, Jessica A. Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:Implementation Science Communications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00729-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850206366627528704
author Alexandra L. Rose
Shaina Coogan
Jess Indresano
Steven B. Zeliadt
Jessica A. Chen
author_facet Alexandra L. Rose
Shaina Coogan
Jess Indresano
Steven B. Zeliadt
Jessica A. Chen
author_sort Alexandra L. Rose
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The high prevalence and significant morbidity and mortality associated with chronic pain among veterans has made expansion of pain services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) a key priority. TelePain, in which services are provided via telehealth from central “hub” sites to patients at decentralized “spoke” sites, is one such model with positive implementation findings to date. However, the staff effort and cost of implementation have yet to be examined when considering TelePain or similar virtual hub-and spoke models of specialty pain care, information that is critical for expansion of services. Methods Using an established time-based activity tracker designed for implementation facilitation, study staff tracked minutes spent on implementation activities at 11 spoke sites. Annual salaries were extracted to calculate an average cost per minute for each personnel type. Costs per personnel minute were combined with activity data to calculate costs of implementation activities at spoke sites. Implementation reach outcomes for the first 36 months of implementation were extracted from the electronic health record. Service utilization data was combined with cost data to calculate cost per patient reached and per clinical encounter achieved at each site. Results Total facilitation costs (range: $1,746-$7,978) and unique patients reached (range: 2–46) varied considerably across spoke sites and greater staff implementation efforts (measured in time or cost) were not associated with greater numbers of patients reached. Therefore, costs per patient reached also varied widely (range: $120–2,569) across spoke sites. Key challenges included high rurality and small clinic size; insufficient engagement of frontline providers; lack of referral options for high acuity patients; and lack of existing programming within which to situate pain services. Conclusions At spoke sites where patients were consistently referred and reached, costs were relatively modest, particularly compared to the high cost of untreated chronic pain, suggesting the potential impact of this model at scale. However, in spoke sites where referrals and encounters were low during initial implementation, cost per patient was high. Findings highlight the need for better methods for tailoring of facilitation interventions to spoke site’s individual needs to maximize impact.
format Article
id doaj-art-ca4e62afed454f31998055046a64a8e6
institution OA Journals
issn 2662-2211
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science Communications
spelling doaj-art-ca4e62afed454f31998055046a64a8e62025-08-20T02:10:50ZengBMCImplementation Science Communications2662-22112025-05-016111110.1186/s43058-025-00729-6Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health AdministrationAlexandra L. Rose0Shaina Coogan1Jess Indresano2Steven B. Zeliadt3Jessica A. Chen4Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College ParkSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR)Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR)Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR)Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR)Abstract Background The high prevalence and significant morbidity and mortality associated with chronic pain among veterans has made expansion of pain services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) a key priority. TelePain, in which services are provided via telehealth from central “hub” sites to patients at decentralized “spoke” sites, is one such model with positive implementation findings to date. However, the staff effort and cost of implementation have yet to be examined when considering TelePain or similar virtual hub-and spoke models of specialty pain care, information that is critical for expansion of services. Methods Using an established time-based activity tracker designed for implementation facilitation, study staff tracked minutes spent on implementation activities at 11 spoke sites. Annual salaries were extracted to calculate an average cost per minute for each personnel type. Costs per personnel minute were combined with activity data to calculate costs of implementation activities at spoke sites. Implementation reach outcomes for the first 36 months of implementation were extracted from the electronic health record. Service utilization data was combined with cost data to calculate cost per patient reached and per clinical encounter achieved at each site. Results Total facilitation costs (range: $1,746-$7,978) and unique patients reached (range: 2–46) varied considerably across spoke sites and greater staff implementation efforts (measured in time or cost) were not associated with greater numbers of patients reached. Therefore, costs per patient reached also varied widely (range: $120–2,569) across spoke sites. Key challenges included high rurality and small clinic size; insufficient engagement of frontline providers; lack of referral options for high acuity patients; and lack of existing programming within which to situate pain services. Conclusions At spoke sites where patients were consistently referred and reached, costs were relatively modest, particularly compared to the high cost of untreated chronic pain, suggesting the potential impact of this model at scale. However, in spoke sites where referrals and encounters were low during initial implementation, cost per patient was high. Findings highlight the need for better methods for tailoring of facilitation interventions to spoke site’s individual needs to maximize impact.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00729-6Chronic painVeteransCosts and cost analysisHealth services accessibility
spellingShingle Alexandra L. Rose
Shaina Coogan
Jess Indresano
Steven B. Zeliadt
Jessica A. Chen
Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration
Implementation Science Communications
Chronic pain
Veterans
Costs and cost analysis
Health services accessibility
title Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration
title_full Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration
title_fullStr Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration
title_short Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration
title_sort evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing telepain in the veterans health administration
topic Chronic pain
Veterans
Costs and cost analysis
Health services accessibility
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00729-6
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandralrose evaluatingspokefacilitationcostsofimplementingtelepainintheveteranshealthadministration
AT shainacoogan evaluatingspokefacilitationcostsofimplementingtelepainintheveteranshealthadministration
AT jessindresano evaluatingspokefacilitationcostsofimplementingtelepainintheveteranshealthadministration
AT stevenbzeliadt evaluatingspokefacilitationcostsofimplementingtelepainintheveteranshealthadministration
AT jessicaachen evaluatingspokefacilitationcostsofimplementingtelepainintheveteranshealthadministration