Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture

ObjectiveTo explore the difference of efficacy and safety between denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP), and to optimize the medication regimen for PMOP patients. MethodsA total of 123 PMOP patients with high risk of fracture at the Second...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing ZHOU, Xingyun HOU, Tingting LIU, Jiaoyang ZHENG
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shanghai Chinese Clinical Medicine Press Co., Ltd. 2025-02-01
Series:Zhongguo Linchuang Yixue
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.c-jcm.com/article/doi/10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2025.20241118
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850240034625552384
author Jing ZHOU
Xingyun HOU
Tingting LIU
Jiaoyang ZHENG
author_facet Jing ZHOU
Xingyun HOU
Tingting LIU
Jiaoyang ZHENG
author_sort Jing ZHOU
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo explore the difference of efficacy and safety between denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP), and to optimize the medication regimen for PMOP patients. MethodsA total of 123 PMOP patients with high risk of fracture at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from September 2021 to March 2024 were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the denosumab group (n=63) and the zoledronic acid group (n=60). Both groups underwent one-year treatment and follow-up, bone metabolism indexes, lumbar vertebrae, femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) were monitored, and any adverse reactions were documented. ResultsAfter treatment, the lumbar vertebrae and total hip BMD of patients in the denosumab group and the zoledronic acid group were significantly improved (P<0.05); the femoral neck BMD of patients in the zoledronic acid group was also significantly improved (P<0.05). The improvement of lumbar vertebrae BMD in the denosumab group was significantly better than that in the zoledronic acid group, while the improvement of femoral neck and total hip BMD in the zoledronic acid group was significantly better than that in the denosumab group (P<0.05). Bone metabolism indicators were significantly improved in both groups (P<0.05), and no significant liver and kidney dysfunction were observed. A total of 7 patients in the zoledronic acid group had mild adverse reactions and 5 patients in the denosumab group had mild adverse reactions. ConclusionsDenosumab significantly increased lumbar vertebrae BMD and improved bone metabolism markers in PMOP patients, thus reducing risk of fracture and demonstrating good safety.
format Article
id doaj-art-ca147fd948ea4440a4e0d8d98f6c5f6a
institution OA Journals
issn 1008-6358
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Shanghai Chinese Clinical Medicine Press Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Zhongguo Linchuang Yixue
spelling doaj-art-ca147fd948ea4440a4e0d8d98f6c5f6a2025-08-20T02:00:59ZengShanghai Chinese Clinical Medicine Press Co., Ltd.Zhongguo Linchuang Yixue1008-63582025-02-01321859210.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2025.2024111820241118Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fractureJing ZHOU0Xingyun HOU1Tingting LIU2Jiaoyang ZHENG3Department of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, ChinaDepartment of Health Management, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, ChinaDepartment of Health Management, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, ChinaObjectiveTo explore the difference of efficacy and safety between denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP), and to optimize the medication regimen for PMOP patients. MethodsA total of 123 PMOP patients with high risk of fracture at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from September 2021 to March 2024 were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the denosumab group (n=63) and the zoledronic acid group (n=60). Both groups underwent one-year treatment and follow-up, bone metabolism indexes, lumbar vertebrae, femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) were monitored, and any adverse reactions were documented. ResultsAfter treatment, the lumbar vertebrae and total hip BMD of patients in the denosumab group and the zoledronic acid group were significantly improved (P<0.05); the femoral neck BMD of patients in the zoledronic acid group was also significantly improved (P<0.05). The improvement of lumbar vertebrae BMD in the denosumab group was significantly better than that in the zoledronic acid group, while the improvement of femoral neck and total hip BMD in the zoledronic acid group was significantly better than that in the denosumab group (P<0.05). Bone metabolism indicators were significantly improved in both groups (P<0.05), and no significant liver and kidney dysfunction were observed. A total of 7 patients in the zoledronic acid group had mild adverse reactions and 5 patients in the denosumab group had mild adverse reactions. ConclusionsDenosumab significantly increased lumbar vertebrae BMD and improved bone metabolism markers in PMOP patients, thus reducing risk of fracture and demonstrating good safety.https://www.c-jcm.com/article/doi/10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2025.20241118high risk of fracturepostmenopausal osteoporosisdenosumabzoledronic acid
spellingShingle Jing ZHOU
Xingyun HOU
Tingting LIU
Jiaoyang ZHENG
Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
Zhongguo Linchuang Yixue
high risk of fracture
postmenopausal osteoporosis
denosumab
zoledronic acid
title Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
title_full Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
title_fullStr Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
title_short Efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
title_sort efficacy evaluation of denosumab in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
topic high risk of fracture
postmenopausal osteoporosis
denosumab
zoledronic acid
url https://www.c-jcm.com/article/doi/10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2025.20241118
work_keys_str_mv AT jingzhou efficacyevaluationofdenosumabinthetreatmentofpatientswithpostmenopausalosteoporosisathighriskoffracture
AT xingyunhou efficacyevaluationofdenosumabinthetreatmentofpatientswithpostmenopausalosteoporosisathighriskoffracture
AT tingtingliu efficacyevaluationofdenosumabinthetreatmentofpatientswithpostmenopausalosteoporosisathighriskoffracture
AT jiaoyangzheng efficacyevaluationofdenosumabinthetreatmentofpatientswithpostmenopausalosteoporosisathighriskoffracture