Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and Attitudes

Through long-form, creative, high-quality stories, slow journalism seeks to counteract the effects of speed and immediacy in news production and consumption primarily driven by technological advancements. The advantages of artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism include generating and enhancing c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iban Albizu-Rivas, Sonia Parratt-Fernández, Montse Mera-Fernández
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Journalism and Media
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/5/4/111
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850240771135897600
author Iban Albizu-Rivas
Sonia Parratt-Fernández
Montse Mera-Fernández
author_facet Iban Albizu-Rivas
Sonia Parratt-Fernández
Montse Mera-Fernández
author_sort Iban Albizu-Rivas
collection DOAJ
description Through long-form, creative, high-quality stories, slow journalism seeks to counteract the effects of speed and immediacy in news production and consumption primarily driven by technological advancements. The advantages of artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism include generating and enhancing content, reducing workloads, and consequently giving journalists more time for non-routine and creative tasks. This raises the question of where AI fits into slow journalism. Twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with practitioners of slow journalism in Spain to explore their use, attitudes, and perceptions of AI in their work. The findings indicate that the interviewees make rudimentary use of AI tools, and their attitudes range from a slight lack of interest to a willingness to learn more about them, alongside concerns regarding ethical boundaries and the potential for job losses. They assert that they have a moral and human responsibility when producing stories that AI cannot enhance in terms of quality, creativity, and emotional depth. It can be concluded that AI offers little to ‘slow’ journalists due to the significant limitations in enhancing long-form reporting. At most, it may enable them to streamline repetitive and non-creative work, thereby allowing the depth required in slow journalism, at least in its current state of development.
format Article
id doaj-art-c9e55090ec6d4c0d88e6cc449f800d3e
institution OA Journals
issn 2673-5172
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journalism and Media
spelling doaj-art-c9e55090ec6d4c0d88e6cc449f800d3e2025-08-20T02:00:46ZengMDPI AGJournalism and Media2673-51722024-12-01541836185010.3390/journalmedia5040111Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and AttitudesIban Albizu-Rivas0Sonia Parratt-Fernández1Montse Mera-Fernández2Department of Journalism and Global Communication, Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Journalism and Global Communication, Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Journalism and Global Communication, Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainThrough long-form, creative, high-quality stories, slow journalism seeks to counteract the effects of speed and immediacy in news production and consumption primarily driven by technological advancements. The advantages of artificial intelligence (AI) in journalism include generating and enhancing content, reducing workloads, and consequently giving journalists more time for non-routine and creative tasks. This raises the question of where AI fits into slow journalism. Twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with practitioners of slow journalism in Spain to explore their use, attitudes, and perceptions of AI in their work. The findings indicate that the interviewees make rudimentary use of AI tools, and their attitudes range from a slight lack of interest to a willingness to learn more about them, alongside concerns regarding ethical boundaries and the potential for job losses. They assert that they have a moral and human responsibility when producing stories that AI cannot enhance in terms of quality, creativity, and emotional depth. It can be concluded that AI offers little to ‘slow’ journalists due to the significant limitations in enhancing long-form reporting. At most, it may enable them to streamline repetitive and non-creative work, thereby allowing the depth required in slow journalism, at least in its current state of development.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/5/4/111slow journalismnarrative journalismin-depth journalismartificial intelligencejournalistsSpain
spellingShingle Iban Albizu-Rivas
Sonia Parratt-Fernández
Montse Mera-Fernández
Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and Attitudes
Journalism and Media
slow journalism
narrative journalism
in-depth journalism
artificial intelligence
journalists
Spain
title Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and Attitudes
title_full Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and Attitudes
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and Attitudes
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and Attitudes
title_short Artificial Intelligence in Slow Journalism: Journalists’ Uses, Perceptions, and Attitudes
title_sort artificial intelligence in slow journalism journalists uses perceptions and attitudes
topic slow journalism
narrative journalism
in-depth journalism
artificial intelligence
journalists
Spain
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/5/4/111
work_keys_str_mv AT ibanalbizurivas artificialintelligenceinslowjournalismjournalistsusesperceptionsandattitudes
AT soniaparrattfernandez artificialintelligenceinslowjournalismjournalistsusesperceptionsandattitudes
AT montsemerafernandez artificialintelligenceinslowjournalismjournalistsusesperceptionsandattitudes