Individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity

Abstract This study explores the appeal of different types of spirals, commonly found in nature, architecture, and art. The first experiment investigated aesthetic appreciation of Archimedean, logarithmic, and golden spirals, considering factors such as size and the number of turns. As a result, thr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronald Hübner, Golfam Goodarzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14326-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849333241763332096
author Ronald Hübner
Golfam Goodarzi
author_facet Ronald Hübner
Golfam Goodarzi
author_sort Ronald Hübner
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study explores the appeal of different types of spirals, commonly found in nature, architecture, and art. The first experiment investigated aesthetic appreciation of Archimedean, logarithmic, and golden spirals, considering factors such as size and the number of turns. As a result, three groups of individuals were identified: those who favored golden spirals, those who preferred Archimedean spirals, and a group that liked logarithmic spirals and similar ones. Interestingly, personality traits showed no clear relation with these preferences. In the first part of a second experiment, the participants were not only asked to choose between different types of spirals, but also to justify their choice by providing reasons. The results indicate that the preferences often stem from the spirals’ features as well as from personal associations, confirming that aesthetic judgments are influenced by both objective and subjective factors. However, results also suggested that the preference for certain types of spirals is related to creativity. This hypothesis was tested in the second part of the second experiment in which participants generated associations to the spirals. The analysis of the frequency and originality of the associations revealed that individuals who prefer the golden spiral to the Archimedean spiral tend to be more creative. Overall, the study highlights the complexity of aesthetic preferences and the potential role of both objective features and subjective associations in shaping our responses to spirals.
format Article
id doaj-art-c9e1c6146b5f4de9a2ce3fa880a323f0
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-c9e1c6146b5f4de9a2ce3fa880a323f02025-08-20T03:45:56ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-08-0115111810.1038/s41598-025-14326-zIndividual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativityRonald Hübner0Golfam Goodarzi1 Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz Department of Psychology, University of KonstanzAbstract This study explores the appeal of different types of spirals, commonly found in nature, architecture, and art. The first experiment investigated aesthetic appreciation of Archimedean, logarithmic, and golden spirals, considering factors such as size and the number of turns. As a result, three groups of individuals were identified: those who favored golden spirals, those who preferred Archimedean spirals, and a group that liked logarithmic spirals and similar ones. Interestingly, personality traits showed no clear relation with these preferences. In the first part of a second experiment, the participants were not only asked to choose between different types of spirals, but also to justify their choice by providing reasons. The results indicate that the preferences often stem from the spirals’ features as well as from personal associations, confirming that aesthetic judgments are influenced by both objective and subjective factors. However, results also suggested that the preference for certain types of spirals is related to creativity. This hypothesis was tested in the second part of the second experiment in which participants generated associations to the spirals. The analysis of the frequency and originality of the associations revealed that individuals who prefer the golden spiral to the Archimedean spiral tend to be more creative. Overall, the study highlights the complexity of aesthetic preferences and the potential role of both objective features and subjective associations in shaping our responses to spirals.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14326-zArchimedean spiralGolden spiralAesthetic preferenceIndividual differencesCreativity
spellingShingle Ronald Hübner
Golfam Goodarzi
Individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity
Scientific Reports
Archimedean spiral
Golden spiral
Aesthetic preference
Individual differences
Creativity
title Individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity
title_full Individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity
title_fullStr Individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity
title_full_unstemmed Individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity
title_short Individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity
title_sort individual preferences for certain types of spirals and the possible role of creativity
topic Archimedean spiral
Golden spiral
Aesthetic preference
Individual differences
Creativity
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14326-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ronaldhubner individualpreferencesforcertaintypesofspiralsandthepossibleroleofcreativity
AT golfamgoodarzi individualpreferencesforcertaintypesofspiralsandthepossibleroleofcreativity