From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature

(1) Burn injuries demand multidisciplinary, evidence-based care, yet the extensive literature complicates timely decision making. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) synthesizes research while addressing inaccuracies in pretrained models. However, citation bias in sourcing for RAG often prioritizes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariana Genovese, Srinivasagam Prabha, Sahar Borna, Cesar A. Gomez-Cabello, Syed Ali Haider, Maissa Trabilsy, Cui Tao, Antonio Jorge Forte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:European Burn Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1991/6/2/28
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850156902473793536
author Ariana Genovese
Srinivasagam Prabha
Sahar Borna
Cesar A. Gomez-Cabello
Syed Ali Haider
Maissa Trabilsy
Cui Tao
Antonio Jorge Forte
author_facet Ariana Genovese
Srinivasagam Prabha
Sahar Borna
Cesar A. Gomez-Cabello
Syed Ali Haider
Maissa Trabilsy
Cui Tao
Antonio Jorge Forte
author_sort Ariana Genovese
collection DOAJ
description (1) Burn injuries demand multidisciplinary, evidence-based care, yet the extensive literature complicates timely decision making. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) synthesizes research while addressing inaccuracies in pretrained models. However, citation bias in sourcing for RAG often prioritizes highly cited studies, overlooking less-cited but valuable research. This study examines RAG’s performance in burn management, comparing citation levels to enhance evidence synthesis, reduce selection bias, and guide decisions. (2) Two burn management datasets were assembled: 30 highly cited (mean: 303) and 30 less-cited (mean: 21). The Gemini-1.0-Pro-002 RAG model addressed 30 questions, ranging from foundational principles to advanced surgical approaches. Responses were evaluated for accuracy (5-point scale), readability (Flesch–Kincaid metrics), and response time with Wilcoxon rank sum tests (<i>p</i> < 0.05). (3) RAG achieved comparable accuracy (4.6 vs. 4.2, <i>p</i> = 0.49), readability (Flesch Reading Ease: 42.8 vs. 46.5, <i>p</i> = 0.26; Grade Level: 9.9 vs. 9.5, <i>p</i> = 0.29), and response time (2.8 vs. 2.5 s, <i>p</i> = 0.39) for the highly and less-cited datasets. (4) Less-cited research performed similarly to highly cited sources. This equivalence broadens clinicians’ access to novel, diverse insights without sacrificing quality. As plastic surgery evolves, RAG’s inclusive approach fosters innovation, improves patient care, and reduces cognitive burden by integrating underutilized studies. Embracing RAG could propel the field toward dynamic, forward-thinking care.
format Article
id doaj-art-c9b3e342b1184a76b5d71c48a5b7e18d
institution OA Journals
issn 2673-1991
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series European Burn Journal
spelling doaj-art-c9b3e342b1184a76b5d71c48a5b7e18d2025-08-20T02:24:21ZengMDPI AGEuropean Burn Journal2673-19912025-06-01622810.3390/ebj6020028From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management LiteratureAriana Genovese0Srinivasagam Prabha1Sahar Borna2Cesar A. Gomez-Cabello3Syed Ali Haider4Maissa Trabilsy5Cui Tao6Antonio Jorge Forte7Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA(1) Burn injuries demand multidisciplinary, evidence-based care, yet the extensive literature complicates timely decision making. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) synthesizes research while addressing inaccuracies in pretrained models. However, citation bias in sourcing for RAG often prioritizes highly cited studies, overlooking less-cited but valuable research. This study examines RAG’s performance in burn management, comparing citation levels to enhance evidence synthesis, reduce selection bias, and guide decisions. (2) Two burn management datasets were assembled: 30 highly cited (mean: 303) and 30 less-cited (mean: 21). The Gemini-1.0-Pro-002 RAG model addressed 30 questions, ranging from foundational principles to advanced surgical approaches. Responses were evaluated for accuracy (5-point scale), readability (Flesch–Kincaid metrics), and response time with Wilcoxon rank sum tests (<i>p</i> < 0.05). (3) RAG achieved comparable accuracy (4.6 vs. 4.2, <i>p</i> = 0.49), readability (Flesch Reading Ease: 42.8 vs. 46.5, <i>p</i> = 0.26; Grade Level: 9.9 vs. 9.5, <i>p</i> = 0.29), and response time (2.8 vs. 2.5 s, <i>p</i> = 0.39) for the highly and less-cited datasets. (4) Less-cited research performed similarly to highly cited sources. This equivalence broadens clinicians’ access to novel, diverse insights without sacrificing quality. As plastic surgery evolves, RAG’s inclusive approach fosters innovation, improves patient care, and reduces cognitive burden by integrating underutilized studies. Embracing RAG could propel the field toward dynamic, forward-thinking care.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1991/6/2/28AI (artificial intelligence)large language modelRAG (retrieval-augmented generation)burnplastic surgeryclinical decision support
spellingShingle Ariana Genovese
Srinivasagam Prabha
Sahar Borna
Cesar A. Gomez-Cabello
Syed Ali Haider
Maissa Trabilsy
Cui Tao
Antonio Jorge Forte
From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature
European Burn Journal
AI (artificial intelligence)
large language model
RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)
burn
plastic surgery
clinical decision support
title From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature
title_full From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature
title_fullStr From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature
title_full_unstemmed From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature
title_short From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature
title_sort from data to decisions leveraging retrieval augmented generation to balance citation bias in burn management literature
topic AI (artificial intelligence)
large language model
RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)
burn
plastic surgery
clinical decision support
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1991/6/2/28
work_keys_str_mv AT arianagenovese fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature
AT srinivasagamprabha fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature
AT saharborna fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature
AT cesaragomezcabello fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature
AT syedalihaider fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature
AT maissatrabilsy fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature
AT cuitao fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature
AT antoniojorgeforte fromdatatodecisionsleveragingretrievalaugmentedgenerationtobalancecitationbiasinburnmanagementliterature