Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states

Introduction: Once formed, focal lesions that develop in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) can follow different trajectories. We aimed at identifying early clinical and MRI features associated with the evolution of new MS lesions into chronic-active versus remyelinated states. Methods: New contr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Boffa, C. Razzetta, D. Boccia, S. Garbarino, E. Cipriano, A. Uccelli, C. Lapucci, M. Piana, M. Inglese
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:NeuroImage: Clinical
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158225000932
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849690124656312320
author G. Boffa
C. Razzetta
D. Boccia
S. Garbarino
E. Cipriano
A. Uccelli
C. Lapucci
M. Piana
M. Inglese
author_facet G. Boffa
C. Razzetta
D. Boccia
S. Garbarino
E. Cipriano
A. Uccelli
C. Lapucci
M. Piana
M. Inglese
author_sort G. Boffa
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Once formed, focal lesions that develop in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) can follow different trajectories. We aimed at identifying early clinical and MRI features associated with the evolution of new MS lesions into chronic-active versus remyelinated states. Methods: New contrast-enhancing (CE) lesions were classified after a 12-month follow-up with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) into paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs, representing chronic-active lesions) and isointense QSM lesions (ISO, representing remyelinated lesions). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, which highlights the most relevant features contributing to model predictions, was conducted using baseline clinical and MRI characteristics. A risk score was calculated for PRL and ISO classifications using the four most influential features for each task. Results: A total of 111 lesions from 44 MS patients were analyzed. At 12 months, 13 % lesions were classified as PRL and 45 % as ISO. The key predictive features were similar for both classes (lesion volume, patient age and sex) except for the pattern of contrast enhancement (which was selected for PRL classification) and lesion topography (which was selected for ISO classification). Older age (>48 years), male sex, bigger lesion volume (>5 mL) and the presence of a ring pattern of contrast enhancement favored PRLs, while younger age (<36 years), female sex, smaller lesion volume (<0.17 mL) and the juxta-subcortical/deep white matter location favored ISO. Interpretation: The outcome of a new MS lesion can be predicted at lesion onset considering few clinically accessible features.
format Article
id doaj-art-c9abb90a3e2848408d08c341c9e891f2
institution DOAJ
issn 2213-1582
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage: Clinical
spelling doaj-art-c9abb90a3e2848408d08c341c9e891f22025-08-20T03:21:24ZengElsevierNeuroImage: Clinical2213-15822025-01-014710382310.1016/j.nicl.2025.103823Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated statesG. Boffa0C. Razzetta1D. Boccia2S. Garbarino3E. Cipriano4A. Uccelli5C. Lapucci6M. Piana7M. Inglese8Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, ItalyDipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, ItalyIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, ItalyIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Corresponding author.Introduction: Once formed, focal lesions that develop in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) can follow different trajectories. We aimed at identifying early clinical and MRI features associated with the evolution of new MS lesions into chronic-active versus remyelinated states. Methods: New contrast-enhancing (CE) lesions were classified after a 12-month follow-up with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) into paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs, representing chronic-active lesions) and isointense QSM lesions (ISO, representing remyelinated lesions). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, which highlights the most relevant features contributing to model predictions, was conducted using baseline clinical and MRI characteristics. A risk score was calculated for PRL and ISO classifications using the four most influential features for each task. Results: A total of 111 lesions from 44 MS patients were analyzed. At 12 months, 13 % lesions were classified as PRL and 45 % as ISO. The key predictive features were similar for both classes (lesion volume, patient age and sex) except for the pattern of contrast enhancement (which was selected for PRL classification) and lesion topography (which was selected for ISO classification). Older age (>48 years), male sex, bigger lesion volume (>5 mL) and the presence of a ring pattern of contrast enhancement favored PRLs, while younger age (<36 years), female sex, smaller lesion volume (<0.17 mL) and the juxta-subcortical/deep white matter location favored ISO. Interpretation: The outcome of a new MS lesion can be predicted at lesion onset considering few clinically accessible features.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158225000932Multiple sclerosisParamagnetic rim lesionsChronic active lesionsRemyelinated lesionsQSMIsointense lesions
spellingShingle G. Boffa
C. Razzetta
D. Boccia
S. Garbarino
E. Cipriano
A. Uccelli
C. Lapucci
M. Piana
M. Inglese
Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states
NeuroImage: Clinical
Multiple sclerosis
Paramagnetic rim lesions
Chronic active lesions
Remyelinated lesions
QSM
Isointense lesions
title Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states
title_full Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states
title_fullStr Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states
title_full_unstemmed Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states
title_short Determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states
title_sort determinants driving the evolution of new multiple sclerosis lesions into chronic active or remyelinated states
topic Multiple sclerosis
Paramagnetic rim lesions
Chronic active lesions
Remyelinated lesions
QSM
Isointense lesions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158225000932
work_keys_str_mv AT gboffa determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT crazzetta determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT dboccia determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT sgarbarino determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT ecipriano determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT auccelli determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT clapucci determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT mpiana determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates
AT minglese determinantsdrivingtheevolutionofnewmultiplesclerosislesionsintochronicactiveorremyelinatedstates