Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study

<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the non-inferiority of non-contrast CT compared to contrast-enhanced CT with both intravenous and rectal contrast application for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. <b>Methods</b>: Five readers retrospectively evaluated the non-contr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorottya Móré, Stella Erdmann, Arved Bischoff, Verena Wagner, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Lukas F. Liesenfeld, Katharina Abbasi Dezfouli, Athanasios Giannakis, Miriam Klauß, Philipp Mayer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/1/29
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841549301502705664
author Dorottya Móré
Stella Erdmann
Arved Bischoff
Verena Wagner
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Lukas F. Liesenfeld
Katharina Abbasi Dezfouli
Athanasios Giannakis
Miriam Klauß
Philipp Mayer
author_facet Dorottya Móré
Stella Erdmann
Arved Bischoff
Verena Wagner
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Lukas F. Liesenfeld
Katharina Abbasi Dezfouli
Athanasios Giannakis
Miriam Klauß
Philipp Mayer
author_sort Dorottya Móré
collection DOAJ
description <b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the non-inferiority of non-contrast CT compared to contrast-enhanced CT with both intravenous and rectal contrast application for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. <b>Methods</b>: Five readers retrospectively evaluated the non-contrast and contrast-enhanced series of CTs of 205 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute diverticulitis. Two randomized reading sessions, both containing all 205 cases as either contrast-enhanced or non-contrast (1:1) series, were performed with ≥8 weeks washout between them. The non-inferiority margin was set to 0.1. <b>Results</b>: The pooled prevalence (all readers) of diverticulitis was similar for non-contrast CT (63.9%, range: 60.5–65.0%) and contrast-enhanced CT (64.4%, 61.5–67.8%). Non-contrast CT was non-inferior for the diagnosis of diverticulitis (accuracy 0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.89, 0.92]) compared to contrast-enhanced CT (0.92 [0.90, 0.94]; the difference in accuracy: −0.01 [−0.04, 0.01]) (normal deviate test: <i>p</i>-value<sub>one-sided</sub> = 5.20 × 10<sup>−6</sup>). Sensitivities for perforation and abscess were slightly but significantly lower for the non-contrast CT than for the contrast-enhanced CT (differences: −0.15 [−0.20, −0.05], −0.17 [−0.27, −0.07]), while no differences in accuracies and specificities were observed. <b>Conclusions</b>: Non-contrast CT is non-inferior to contrast-enhanced CT (intravenous and rectal contrast) for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. Contrast-enhanced CT is associated with significantly higher sensitivities for the presence of an abscess or perforation.
format Article
id doaj-art-c999a069af96410b9215bfe5be0889a0
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-4418
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj-art-c999a069af96410b9215bfe5be0889a02025-01-10T13:16:30ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182024-12-011512910.3390/diagnostics15010029Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center StudyDorottya Móré0Stella Erdmann1Arved Bischoff2Verena Wagner3Hans-Ulrich Kauczor4Lukas F. Liesenfeld5Katharina Abbasi Dezfouli6Athanasios Giannakis7Miriam Klauß8Philipp Mayer9Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the non-inferiority of non-contrast CT compared to contrast-enhanced CT with both intravenous and rectal contrast application for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. <b>Methods</b>: Five readers retrospectively evaluated the non-contrast and contrast-enhanced series of CTs of 205 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute diverticulitis. Two randomized reading sessions, both containing all 205 cases as either contrast-enhanced or non-contrast (1:1) series, were performed with ≥8 weeks washout between them. The non-inferiority margin was set to 0.1. <b>Results</b>: The pooled prevalence (all readers) of diverticulitis was similar for non-contrast CT (63.9%, range: 60.5–65.0%) and contrast-enhanced CT (64.4%, 61.5–67.8%). Non-contrast CT was non-inferior for the diagnosis of diverticulitis (accuracy 0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.89, 0.92]) compared to contrast-enhanced CT (0.92 [0.90, 0.94]; the difference in accuracy: −0.01 [−0.04, 0.01]) (normal deviate test: <i>p</i>-value<sub>one-sided</sub> = 5.20 × 10<sup>−6</sup>). Sensitivities for perforation and abscess were slightly but significantly lower for the non-contrast CT than for the contrast-enhanced CT (differences: −0.15 [−0.20, −0.05], −0.17 [−0.27, −0.07]), while no differences in accuracies and specificities were observed. <b>Conclusions</b>: Non-contrast CT is non-inferior to contrast-enhanced CT (intravenous and rectal contrast) for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. Contrast-enhanced CT is associated with significantly higher sensitivities for the presence of an abscess or perforation.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/1/29colonic diverticulitiscomputed tomographynon-contrast computed tomographycontrast enemareader study
spellingShingle Dorottya Móré
Stella Erdmann
Arved Bischoff
Verena Wagner
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Lukas F. Liesenfeld
Katharina Abbasi Dezfouli
Athanasios Giannakis
Miriam Klauß
Philipp Mayer
Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study
Diagnostics
colonic diverticulitis
computed tomography
non-contrast computed tomography
contrast enema
reader study
title Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study
title_full Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study
title_short Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study
title_sort comparison of non contrast ct vs contrast enhanced ct with both intravenous and rectal contrast application for diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis a multireader retrospective single center study
topic colonic diverticulitis
computed tomography
non-contrast computed tomography
contrast enema
reader study
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/1/29
work_keys_str_mv AT dorottyamore comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT stellaerdmann comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT arvedbischoff comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT verenawagner comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT hansulrichkauczor comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT lukasfliesenfeld comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT katharinaabbasidezfouli comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT athanasiosgiannakis comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT miriamklauß comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT philippmayer comparisonofnoncontrastctvscontrastenhancedctwithbothintravenousandrectalcontrastapplicationfordiagnosisofacutecolonicdiverticulitisamultireaderretrospectivesinglecenterstudy