Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test Analysis

A post-test analysis of a set of inside-diameter/outside-diameter (ID/OD) bidirectional brush seals used in three-port wave rotor tests was undertaken to determine brush bristle and configuration wear, pullout, and rotor coating wear. The results suggest that sharp changes in the pressure profiles w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert C. Hendricks, Jack Wilson, Tom Y. Wu, Ralph Flower, Robert L. Mullen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1999-01-01
Series:International Journal of Rotating Machinery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1023621X99000159
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567059982057472
author Robert C. Hendricks
Jack Wilson
Tom Y. Wu
Ralph Flower
Robert L. Mullen
author_facet Robert C. Hendricks
Jack Wilson
Tom Y. Wu
Ralph Flower
Robert L. Mullen
author_sort Robert C. Hendricks
collection DOAJ
description A post-test analysis of a set of inside-diameter/outside-diameter (ID/OD) bidirectional brush seals used in three-port wave rotor tests was undertaken to determine brush bristle and configuration wear, pullout, and rotor coating wear. The results suggest that sharp changes in the pressure profiles were not well reflected in bristle tip configuration patterns or wear. Also, positive-to-negative changes in axial pressure gradients appeared to have little effect on the backing plates. Although the brushes had similar porosities, they had very different unpacked arrays. This difference could explain the departure of experimental data from computational fluid dynamics flow predictions for well-packed arrays at higher pressure drops. The rotor wear led to “car track” scars (upper and lower wear bands) with a whipped surface between the bands. Those bands may have resulted from bristle stiffening at the fence and gap plates during alternate portions of the rotor cycle. Within the bristle response range the wear surface reflected the pressure distribution effect on bristle motion. No sacrificial metallurgical data were taken. The bristles did wear, with correspondingly more wear on the ID brush configurations than on the OD configurations; the complexity in constructing the ID brush was a factor.
format Article
id doaj-art-c992d3188be044a6b26cf2b853d0c9cf
institution Kabale University
issn 1023-621X
language English
publishDate 1999-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Rotating Machinery
spelling doaj-art-c992d3188be044a6b26cf2b853d0c9cf2025-02-03T01:02:26ZengWileyInternational Journal of Rotating Machinery1023-621X1999-01-015316718010.1155/S1023621X99000159Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test AnalysisRobert C. Hendricks0Jack Wilson1Tom Y. Wu2Ralph Flower3Robert L. Mullen4National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland 44135, OH, USANYMA, Inc., Brook Park 44135, OH, USANational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland 44135, OH, USACross Manufacturing Ltd., Devizes, UKCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland 44106, OH, USAA post-test analysis of a set of inside-diameter/outside-diameter (ID/OD) bidirectional brush seals used in three-port wave rotor tests was undertaken to determine brush bristle and configuration wear, pullout, and rotor coating wear. The results suggest that sharp changes in the pressure profiles were not well reflected in bristle tip configuration patterns or wear. Also, positive-to-negative changes in axial pressure gradients appeared to have little effect on the backing plates. Although the brushes had similar porosities, they had very different unpacked arrays. This difference could explain the departure of experimental data from computational fluid dynamics flow predictions for well-packed arrays at higher pressure drops. The rotor wear led to “car track” scars (upper and lower wear bands) with a whipped surface between the bands. Those bands may have resulted from bristle stiffening at the fence and gap plates during alternate portions of the rotor cycle. Within the bristle response range the wear surface reflected the pressure distribution effect on bristle motion. No sacrificial metallurgical data were taken. The bristles did wear, with correspondingly more wear on the ID brush configurations than on the OD configurations; the complexity in constructing the ID brush was a factor.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1023621X99000159Brush sealsWearPorous mediaTribologyCFDWave rotor.
spellingShingle Robert C. Hendricks
Jack Wilson
Tom Y. Wu
Ralph Flower
Robert L. Mullen
Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test Analysis
International Journal of Rotating Machinery
Brush seals
Wear
Porous media
Tribology
CFD
Wave rotor.
title Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test Analysis
title_full Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test Analysis
title_fullStr Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test Analysis
title_short Bidirectional Brush Seals – Post-Test Analysis
title_sort bidirectional brush seals post test analysis
topic Brush seals
Wear
Porous media
Tribology
CFD
Wave rotor.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1023621X99000159
work_keys_str_mv AT robertchendricks bidirectionalbrushsealsposttestanalysis
AT jackwilson bidirectionalbrushsealsposttestanalysis
AT tomywu bidirectionalbrushsealsposttestanalysis
AT ralphflower bidirectionalbrushsealsposttestanalysis
AT robertlmullen bidirectionalbrushsealsposttestanalysis