‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching

Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed See What You Feel (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olga Daneyko, Francesca Frisco, Angelo Maravita, Daniele Zavagno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251318591
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849429681421418496
author Olga Daneyko
Francesca Frisco
Angelo Maravita
Daniele Zavagno
author_facet Olga Daneyko
Francesca Frisco
Angelo Maravita
Daniele Zavagno
author_sort Olga Daneyko
collection DOAJ
description Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed See What You Feel (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handheld spheres, which seems to increase with visual scale distance. Experiment 1 tested the effect of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching. A 19-step visual scale, made of actual 3D spheres (diameters ranging from 2.0 to 5.6 cm), was set at one of three possible distances (30, 160, 290 cm); participants’ task was to find the matching visual spheres for four out-of-sight handheld test spheres (diameters 3.0, 3.8, 4.6, 5.0 cm). Results confirmed the underestimation effect and only partially confirmed the role of scale distance. Experiment 2 investigated the role of scale distance in a visual-to-visual matching task in which the same visual scale was employed, set at one of three distances (37, 160, 290 cm). Participants’ task was to find a match for the same four test stimuli. Results showed no statistical difference between matched and actual sphere sizes with distance 37 cm; underestimations were observed with the far distances, thus reflecting overestimations of scale sphere sizes. Results from both experiments allow us to conclude that the underestimation effect observed with SWYF is a general feature of haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching, and that the SWYF method is a valuable tool for measuring haptic size perception with handheld stimuli when the visual scale is set at a visually comfortable peripersonal distance.
format Article
id doaj-art-c953743a671941278594bfebaa7ceb6e
institution Kabale University
issn 2041-6695
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series i-Perception
spelling doaj-art-c953743a671941278594bfebaa7ceb6e2025-08-20T03:28:17ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952025-01-011610.1177/20416695251318591‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matchingOlga DaneykoFrancesca FriscoAngelo MaravitaDaniele ZavagnoTwo experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed See What You Feel (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handheld spheres, which seems to increase with visual scale distance. Experiment 1 tested the effect of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching. A 19-step visual scale, made of actual 3D spheres (diameters ranging from 2.0 to 5.6 cm), was set at one of three possible distances (30, 160, 290 cm); participants’ task was to find the matching visual spheres for four out-of-sight handheld test spheres (diameters 3.0, 3.8, 4.6, 5.0 cm). Results confirmed the underestimation effect and only partially confirmed the role of scale distance. Experiment 2 investigated the role of scale distance in a visual-to-visual matching task in which the same visual scale was employed, set at one of three distances (37, 160, 290 cm). Participants’ task was to find a match for the same four test stimuli. Results showed no statistical difference between matched and actual sphere sizes with distance 37 cm; underestimations were observed with the far distances, thus reflecting overestimations of scale sphere sizes. Results from both experiments allow us to conclude that the underestimation effect observed with SWYF is a general feature of haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching, and that the SWYF method is a valuable tool for measuring haptic size perception with handheld stimuli when the visual scale is set at a visually comfortable peripersonal distance.https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251318591
spellingShingle Olga Daneyko
Francesca Frisco
Angelo Maravita
Daniele Zavagno
‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching
i-Perception
title ‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching
title_full ‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching
title_fullStr ‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching
title_full_unstemmed ‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching
title_short ‘See what you feel’: The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching
title_sort see what you feel the impact of visual scale distance in haptic to visual crossmodal matching
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251318591
work_keys_str_mv AT olgadaneyko seewhatyoufeeltheimpactofvisualscaledistanceinhaptictovisualcrossmodalmatching
AT francescafrisco seewhatyoufeeltheimpactofvisualscaledistanceinhaptictovisualcrossmodalmatching
AT angelomaravita seewhatyoufeeltheimpactofvisualscaledistanceinhaptictovisualcrossmodalmatching
AT danielezavagno seewhatyoufeeltheimpactofvisualscaledistanceinhaptictovisualcrossmodalmatching