How to Decide Moral Questions Rationally
He aquí un falso dilema: o los juicios morales se han de equiparar con enunciados de hecho (descriptivismo), o el pensamiento moral no es de índole racional (emotivismo). Los dos únicos tipos posibles de descriptivismo, el naturalismo y el intuicionismo, se reducen al relativismo: el primero porque...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | R. M. Hare |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | Crítica |
| Online Access: | https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/633 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Between Individual Decisions and Collegiate Deliberations: deciding how to decide, influencing the outcome
by: Jose Mario Wanderley Gomes Neto, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Deciding for Therapy: Deciding for Peace of Mind
by: Janyne Sattler
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide.
by: Jean Daunizeau, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01) -
How Do We Decide? Thought Architecture Decision Making?
by: Ana Njegovanović
Published: (2021-06-01) -
How to Decide Approaches and Procedures for Early and Advanced Gastric Cancer?
by: Daisuke Izumi, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)