Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX Centuries

The periodization of history and the definition of the framework of Antiquity and the Middle Ages were questions open for scientific discussion at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries, when the Russian school of ancient and medieval studies was actively developing in Russia and especially in St. Pete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. V. Kuleshova, D. N. Starostin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021-12-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3479
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849223626123902976
author E. V. Kuleshova
D. N. Starostin
author_facet E. V. Kuleshova
D. N. Starostin
author_sort E. V. Kuleshova
collection DOAJ
description The periodization of history and the definition of the framework of Antiquity and the Middle Ages were questions open for scientific discussion at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries, when the Russian school of ancient and medieval studies was actively developing in Russia and especially in St. Petersburg. The concept of I. M. Grevs was that the Roman Empire marked the beginning of Late Antiquity with its special economic structure in the form of large land ownership, but this period ended with the onset of the era of barbarian kingdoms. I. M. Grevs separated the Roman Empire from the period of classical Antiquity and at the same time showed its difference from the way of the early Middle Ages. In his courses on general history, read after I. M. Grevs, N. I. Kareev described the ancient universal monarchies, which sought to extend their power to the limits of the ecumene and unite the various traditions of organizing power. It should be concluded that N. I. Kareev supplemented the periodization proposed by I. M. Grevs, finding in the Ancient world the same turning point in the form of the Hellenistic monarchy, similar to that found in Late Antiquity by I. M. Grevs.
format Article
id doaj-art-c909f3e1acee4d5bb98e1701bc1a8dca
institution Kabale University
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj-art-c909f3e1acee4d5bb98e1701bc1a8dca2025-08-25T18:13:26ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952021-12-0101236337910.24224/2227-1295-2021-12-363-3792093Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX CenturiesE. V. Kuleshova0D. N. Starostin1St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. Petersburg State UniversityThe periodization of history and the definition of the framework of Antiquity and the Middle Ages were questions open for scientific discussion at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries, when the Russian school of ancient and medieval studies was actively developing in Russia and especially in St. Petersburg. The concept of I. M. Grevs was that the Roman Empire marked the beginning of Late Antiquity with its special economic structure in the form of large land ownership, but this period ended with the onset of the era of barbarian kingdoms. I. M. Grevs separated the Roman Empire from the period of classical Antiquity and at the same time showed its difference from the way of the early Middle Ages. In his courses on general history, read after I. M. Grevs, N. I. Kareev described the ancient universal monarchies, which sought to extend their power to the limits of the ecumene and unite the various traditions of organizing power. It should be concluded that N. I. Kareev supplemented the periodization proposed by I. M. Grevs, finding in the Ancient world the same turning point in the form of the Hellenistic monarchy, similar to that found in Late Antiquity by I. M. Grevs.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3479i. m. grevsn. i. kareevperiodization of historyantiquitymiddle agesromano-germanic synthesis
spellingShingle E. V. Kuleshova
D. N. Starostin
Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX Centuries
Научный диалог
i. m. grevs
n. i. kareev
periodization of history
antiquity
middle ages
romano-germanic synthesis
title Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX Centuries
title_full Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX Centuries
title_fullStr Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX Centuries
title_full_unstemmed Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX Centuries
title_short Periodization of Antiquity’s History in Studies of I. M. Grevs and N. I. Kareev in Late XIX — Early XX Centuries
title_sort periodization of antiquity s history in studies of i m grevs and n i kareev in late xix early xx centuries
topic i. m. grevs
n. i. kareev
periodization of history
antiquity
middle ages
romano-germanic synthesis
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3479
work_keys_str_mv AT evkuleshova periodizationofantiquityshistoryinstudiesofimgrevsandnikareevinlatexixearlyxxcenturies
AT dnstarostin periodizationofantiquityshistoryinstudiesofimgrevsandnikareevinlatexixearlyxxcenturies