Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method

This paper presents a new, nonlinear, multicriteria, decision-making method: the characteristic objects (COMET). This approach, which can be characterized as a fuzzy reference model, determines a measurement standard for decision-making problems. This model is distinguished by a constant set of spec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrzej Piegat, Wojciech Sałabun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/536492
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556360312553472
author Andrzej Piegat
Wojciech Sałabun
author_facet Andrzej Piegat
Wojciech Sałabun
author_sort Andrzej Piegat
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents a new, nonlinear, multicriteria, decision-making method: the characteristic objects (COMET). This approach, which can be characterized as a fuzzy reference model, determines a measurement standard for decision-making problems. This model is distinguished by a constant set of specially chosen characteristic objects that are independent of the alternatives. After identifying a multicriteria model, this method can be used to compare any number of decisional objects (alternatives) and select the best one. In the COMET, in contrast to other methods, the rank-reversal phenomenon is not observed. Rank-reversal is a paradoxical feature in the decision-making methods, which is caused by determining the absolute evaluations of considered alternatives on the basis of the alternatives themselves. In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and similar methods, when a new alternative is added to the original alternative set, the evaluation base and the resulting evaluations of all objects change. A great advantage of the COMET is its ability to identify not only linear but also nonlinear multicriteria models of decision makers. This identification is based not on a ranking of component criteria of the multicriterion but on a ranking of a larger set of characteristic objects (characteristic alternatives) that are independent of the small set of alternatives analyzed in a given problem. As a result, the COMET is free of the faults of other methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-c8db8da421f4448f8a07178a33e4c6bd
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9724
1687-9732
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
spelling doaj-art-c8db8da421f4448f8a07178a33e4c6bd2025-02-03T05:45:39ZengWileyApplied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing1687-97241687-97322014-01-01201410.1155/2014/536492536492Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects MethodAndrzej Piegat0Wojciech Sałabun1Department of Artificial Intelligence Methods and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Ulica Żołnierska 49, 71-210 Szczecin, PolandDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Methods and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Ulica Żołnierska 49, 71-210 Szczecin, PolandThis paper presents a new, nonlinear, multicriteria, decision-making method: the characteristic objects (COMET). This approach, which can be characterized as a fuzzy reference model, determines a measurement standard for decision-making problems. This model is distinguished by a constant set of specially chosen characteristic objects that are independent of the alternatives. After identifying a multicriteria model, this method can be used to compare any number of decisional objects (alternatives) and select the best one. In the COMET, in contrast to other methods, the rank-reversal phenomenon is not observed. Rank-reversal is a paradoxical feature in the decision-making methods, which is caused by determining the absolute evaluations of considered alternatives on the basis of the alternatives themselves. In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and similar methods, when a new alternative is added to the original alternative set, the evaluation base and the resulting evaluations of all objects change. A great advantage of the COMET is its ability to identify not only linear but also nonlinear multicriteria models of decision makers. This identification is based not on a ranking of component criteria of the multicriterion but on a ranking of a larger set of characteristic objects (characteristic alternatives) that are independent of the small set of alternatives analyzed in a given problem. As a result, the COMET is free of the faults of other methods.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/536492
spellingShingle Andrzej Piegat
Wojciech Sałabun
Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method
Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
title Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method
title_full Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method
title_fullStr Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method
title_full_unstemmed Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method
title_short Identification of a Multicriteria Decision-Making Model Using the Characteristic Objects Method
title_sort identification of a multicriteria decision making model using the characteristic objects method
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/536492
work_keys_str_mv AT andrzejpiegat identificationofamulticriteriadecisionmakingmodelusingthecharacteristicobjectsmethod
AT wojciechsałabun identificationofamulticriteriadecisionmakingmodelusingthecharacteristicobjectsmethod