Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional study

Objectives Evidence suggests that homeless patients experience worse quality of care and poorer health outcomes across a range of medical conditions. It remains unclear, however, whether differences in care delivery at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals explain these disparities. We aimed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atsushi Miyawaki, Yusuke Tsugawa, Dhruv Khullar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/4/e046959.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850130103818780672
author Atsushi Miyawaki
Yusuke Tsugawa
Dhruv Khullar
author_facet Atsushi Miyawaki
Yusuke Tsugawa
Dhruv Khullar
author_sort Atsushi Miyawaki
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Evidence suggests that homeless patients experience worse quality of care and poorer health outcomes across a range of medical conditions. It remains unclear, however, whether differences in care delivery at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals explain these disparities. We aimed to investigate whether homeless versus non-homeless adults hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions (acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke) experience differences in care delivery and health outcomes at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals.Design Cross-sectional study.Setting Data including all hospital admissions in four states (Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, and New York) in 2014.Participants We analysed 167 105 adults aged 18 years or older hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions (age mean=64.5 years; 75 361 (45.1%) women; 2123 (1.3%) homeless hospitalisations) discharged from 348 hospitals.Outcome measures Risk-adjusted diagnostic and therapeutic procedure and in-hospital mortality, after adjusting for patient characteristics and state and quarter fixed effects.Results At safety-net hospitals, homeless adults hospitalised for AMI were less likely to receive coronary angiogram (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.50; p<0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.62; p<0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.71; p<0.01) compared with non-homeless adults. Homeless patients treated for strokes at safety-net hospitals were less likely to receive cerebral arteriography (aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.34; p<0.001), but were as likely to receive thrombolysis therapy. At non-safety-net hospitals, we found no evidence that the probability of receiving these procedures differed between homeless and non-homeless adults hospitalised for AMI or stroke. Finally, there were no differences in in-hospital mortality rates for homeless versus non-homeless patients at either safety-net or non-safety-net hospitals.Conclusion Disparities in receipt of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for homeless patients with cardiovascular conditions were observed only at safety-net hospitals. However, we found no evidence that these differences influenced in-hospital mortality markedly.
format Article
id doaj-art-c8a6e22b740e4503873f0a793cddad0b
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-c8a6e22b740e4503873f0a793cddad0b2025-08-20T02:32:46ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-04-0111410.1136/bmjopen-2020-046959Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional studyAtsushi Miyawaki0Yusuke Tsugawa1Dhruv Khullar2Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USAPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USAObjectives Evidence suggests that homeless patients experience worse quality of care and poorer health outcomes across a range of medical conditions. It remains unclear, however, whether differences in care delivery at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals explain these disparities. We aimed to investigate whether homeless versus non-homeless adults hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions (acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke) experience differences in care delivery and health outcomes at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals.Design Cross-sectional study.Setting Data including all hospital admissions in four states (Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, and New York) in 2014.Participants We analysed 167 105 adults aged 18 years or older hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions (age mean=64.5 years; 75 361 (45.1%) women; 2123 (1.3%) homeless hospitalisations) discharged from 348 hospitals.Outcome measures Risk-adjusted diagnostic and therapeutic procedure and in-hospital mortality, after adjusting for patient characteristics and state and quarter fixed effects.Results At safety-net hospitals, homeless adults hospitalised for AMI were less likely to receive coronary angiogram (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.50; p<0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.62; p<0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.71; p<0.01) compared with non-homeless adults. Homeless patients treated for strokes at safety-net hospitals were less likely to receive cerebral arteriography (aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.34; p<0.001), but were as likely to receive thrombolysis therapy. At non-safety-net hospitals, we found no evidence that the probability of receiving these procedures differed between homeless and non-homeless adults hospitalised for AMI or stroke. Finally, there were no differences in in-hospital mortality rates for homeless versus non-homeless patients at either safety-net or non-safety-net hospitals.Conclusion Disparities in receipt of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for homeless patients with cardiovascular conditions were observed only at safety-net hospitals. However, we found no evidence that these differences influenced in-hospital mortality markedly.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/4/e046959.full
spellingShingle Atsushi Miyawaki
Yusuke Tsugawa
Dhruv Khullar
Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional study
BMJ Open
title Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional study
title_full Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional study
title_short Processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals: cross-sectional study
title_sort processes of care and outcomes for homeless patients hospitalised for cardiovascular conditions at safety net versus non safety net hospitals cross sectional study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/4/e046959.full
work_keys_str_mv AT atsushimiyawaki processesofcareandoutcomesforhomelesspatientshospitalisedforcardiovascularconditionsatsafetynetversusnonsafetynethospitalscrosssectionalstudy
AT yusuketsugawa processesofcareandoutcomesforhomelesspatientshospitalisedforcardiovascularconditionsatsafetynetversusnonsafetynethospitalscrosssectionalstudy
AT dhruvkhullar processesofcareandoutcomesforhomelesspatientshospitalisedforcardiovascularconditionsatsafetynetversusnonsafetynethospitalscrosssectionalstudy