Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?
Within the framework introduced by Guierre (1979), this paper challenges the commonly accepted classification of the adjectival suffix -al as a strong suffix through the study of a corpus of pronouncing dictionary data enriched with additional information from other sources such as the Oxford Englis...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Presses Universitaires du Midi
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Anglophonia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/754 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832579264879263744 |
---|---|
author | Quentin Dabouis |
author_facet | Quentin Dabouis |
author_sort | Quentin Dabouis |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Within the framework introduced by Guierre (1979), this paper challenges the commonly accepted classification of the adjectival suffix -al as a strong suffix through the study of a corpus of pronouncing dictionary data enriched with additional information from other sources such as the Oxford English Dictionary. After a review of the disparities between different analyses and classifications of that suffix in the literature, it is shown that most descriptions previously proposed are problematic. We do find -al in strong endings triggering a direct computation of stress placement, but only in certain specific subclasses. A number of sets ending in -al are highly regular, but -al by itself (i.e. when it is not associated with certain elements preceding it) does not trigger direct computation systematically. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-c8900d50507f4693b9a83b89a5e35744 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1278-3331 2427-0466 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-07-01 |
publisher | Presses Universitaires du Midi |
record_format | Article |
series | Anglophonia |
spelling | doaj-art-c8900d50507f4693b9a83b89a5e357442025-01-30T12:32:57ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662016-07-012110.4000/anglophonia.754Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?Quentin DabouisWithin the framework introduced by Guierre (1979), this paper challenges the commonly accepted classification of the adjectival suffix -al as a strong suffix through the study of a corpus of pronouncing dictionary data enriched with additional information from other sources such as the Oxford English Dictionary. After a review of the disparities between different analyses and classifications of that suffix in the literature, it is shown that most descriptions previously proposed are problematic. We do find -al in strong endings triggering a direct computation of stress placement, but only in certain specific subclasses. A number of sets ending in -al are highly regular, but -al by itself (i.e. when it is not associated with certain elements preceding it) does not trigger direct computation systematically.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/754corpus studyEnglish stressphonologymorphologysuffixation |
spellingShingle | Quentin Dabouis Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix? Anglophonia corpus study English stress phonology morphology suffixation |
title | Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix? |
title_full | Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix? |
title_fullStr | Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix? |
title_short | Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix? |
title_sort | is the adjectival suffix al a strong suffix |
topic | corpus study English stress phonology morphology suffixation |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quentindabouis istheadjectivalsuffixalastrongsuffix |