Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?

Within the framework introduced by Guierre (1979), this paper challenges the commonly accepted classification of the adjectival suffix -al as a strong suffix through the study of a corpus of pronouncing dictionary data enriched with additional information from other sources such as the Oxford Englis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quentin Dabouis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires du Midi 2016-07-01
Series:Anglophonia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/754
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579264879263744
author Quentin Dabouis
author_facet Quentin Dabouis
author_sort Quentin Dabouis
collection DOAJ
description Within the framework introduced by Guierre (1979), this paper challenges the commonly accepted classification of the adjectival suffix -al as a strong suffix through the study of a corpus of pronouncing dictionary data enriched with additional information from other sources such as the Oxford English Dictionary. After a review of the disparities between different analyses and classifications of that suffix in the literature, it is shown that most descriptions previously proposed are problematic. We do find -al in strong endings triggering a direct computation of stress placement, but only in certain specific subclasses. A number of sets ending in -al are highly regular, but -al by itself (i.e. when it is not associated with certain elements preceding it) does not trigger direct computation systematically.
format Article
id doaj-art-c8900d50507f4693b9a83b89a5e35744
institution Kabale University
issn 1278-3331
2427-0466
language English
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Presses Universitaires du Midi
record_format Article
series Anglophonia
spelling doaj-art-c8900d50507f4693b9a83b89a5e357442025-01-30T12:32:57ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662016-07-012110.4000/anglophonia.754Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?Quentin DabouisWithin the framework introduced by Guierre (1979), this paper challenges the commonly accepted classification of the adjectival suffix -al as a strong suffix through the study of a corpus of pronouncing dictionary data enriched with additional information from other sources such as the Oxford English Dictionary. After a review of the disparities between different analyses and classifications of that suffix in the literature, it is shown that most descriptions previously proposed are problematic. We do find -al in strong endings triggering a direct computation of stress placement, but only in certain specific subclasses. A number of sets ending in -al are highly regular, but -al by itself (i.e. when it is not associated with certain elements preceding it) does not trigger direct computation systematically.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/754corpus studyEnglish stressphonologymorphologysuffixation
spellingShingle Quentin Dabouis
Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?
Anglophonia
corpus study
English stress
phonology
morphology
suffixation
title Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?
title_full Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?
title_fullStr Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?
title_short Is the Adjectival Suffix -al a Strong Suffix?
title_sort is the adjectival suffix al a strong suffix
topic corpus study
English stress
phonology
morphology
suffixation
url https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/754
work_keys_str_mv AT quentindabouis istheadjectivalsuffixalastrongsuffix