Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National Parks

Despite its global importance for the maintenance of healthy ecosystems and its contribution in providing economic benefits to human society, the clade Anthophila is in severe decline worldwide. In this context, counteracting the decline in Apoidea is of fundamental importance. Honey bee density and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiara Benedetta Boni, Francesca Coppola, Simona Sagona, Marino Quaranta, Simone Flaminio, Paolo Biella, Stefano Tempesti, Anna Marta Lazzeri, Marco Di Santo, Antonio Felicioli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7159/5/1/5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850205490615681024
author Chiara Benedetta Boni
Francesca Coppola
Simona Sagona
Marino Quaranta
Simone Flaminio
Paolo Biella
Stefano Tempesti
Anna Marta Lazzeri
Marco Di Santo
Antonio Felicioli
author_facet Chiara Benedetta Boni
Francesca Coppola
Simona Sagona
Marino Quaranta
Simone Flaminio
Paolo Biella
Stefano Tempesti
Anna Marta Lazzeri
Marco Di Santo
Antonio Felicioli
author_sort Chiara Benedetta Boni
collection DOAJ
description Despite its global importance for the maintenance of healthy ecosystems and its contribution in providing economic benefits to human society, the clade Anthophila is in severe decline worldwide. In this context, counteracting the decline in Apoidea is of fundamental importance. Honey bee density and beekeeping are believed to negatively impact wild bee populations, mostly through competition for food sources. In this study, interspecific trophic competition was investigated using the still seldom exploited approach of a palynological analysis combined with a metabarcoding analysis of the pollen gathered by both managed honey bees and wild bees in three Italian national parks. The entire trophic network was identified as highly specialized (H2′ = 0.933). The results obtained suggest that, overall, wild bee species are sustained by different pollen sources than honey bees. This low sharing of resources could be due to the natural trend occurring in natural populations, where species tend to minimize the competitive overlap through niche differentiation or niche complementarity as a result of coevolution. National parks play a fundamental role in animal and plant species protection and conservation. Therefore, plans should focus on evaluating honey bee densities in the interests of achieving less intensive, more traditional, and sustainable beekeeping, as well as habitat restoration, to promote the survival and reproduction of wild bee populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-c828d4e598d44808bd3261c852f83f86
institution OA Journals
issn 2673-7159
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Conservation
spelling doaj-art-c828d4e598d44808bd3261c852f83f862025-08-20T02:11:04ZengMDPI AGConservation2673-71592025-01-0151510.3390/conservation5010005Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National ParksChiara Benedetta Boni0Francesca Coppola1Simona Sagona2Marino Quaranta3Simone Flaminio4Paolo Biella5Stefano Tempesti6Anna Marta Lazzeri7Marco Di Santo8Antonio Felicioli9Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa, ItalyCREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via di Saliceto 80, 40128 Bologna, ItalyCREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via di Saliceto 80, 40128 Bologna, ItalyZooPlantLab, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, 2, 20126 Milan, ItalyEnte Parco Nazionale Foreste Casentinesi, Monte Falterona e Campigna, Via Nefetti, 3, 47018 Santa Sofia, ItalyEnte Parco Nazionale Abruzzo, Lazio e Molise, Viale S. Lucia, 2, 67032 Pescasseroli, ItalyEnte Parco Nazionale della Majella, Via Badia, 28, 67039 Sulmona, ItalyDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, ItalyDespite its global importance for the maintenance of healthy ecosystems and its contribution in providing economic benefits to human society, the clade Anthophila is in severe decline worldwide. In this context, counteracting the decline in Apoidea is of fundamental importance. Honey bee density and beekeeping are believed to negatively impact wild bee populations, mostly through competition for food sources. In this study, interspecific trophic competition was investigated using the still seldom exploited approach of a palynological analysis combined with a metabarcoding analysis of the pollen gathered by both managed honey bees and wild bees in three Italian national parks. The entire trophic network was identified as highly specialized (H2′ = 0.933). The results obtained suggest that, overall, wild bee species are sustained by different pollen sources than honey bees. This low sharing of resources could be due to the natural trend occurring in natural populations, where species tend to minimize the competitive overlap through niche differentiation or niche complementarity as a result of coevolution. National parks play a fundamental role in animal and plant species protection and conservation. Therefore, plans should focus on evaluating honey bee densities in the interests of achieving less intensive, more traditional, and sustainable beekeeping, as well as habitat restoration, to promote the survival and reproduction of wild bee populations.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7159/5/1/5bee pasturesinterspecific trophic competitionmanaged beespalynological analysispollen repartitioningprotected areas
spellingShingle Chiara Benedetta Boni
Francesca Coppola
Simona Sagona
Marino Quaranta
Simone Flaminio
Paolo Biella
Stefano Tempesti
Anna Marta Lazzeri
Marco Di Santo
Antonio Felicioli
Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National Parks
Conservation
bee pastures
interspecific trophic competition
managed bees
palynological analysis
pollen repartitioning
protected areas
title Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National Parks
title_full Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National Parks
title_fullStr Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National Parks
title_full_unstemmed Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National Parks
title_short Pollen Resource Repartition Between Managed Honey Bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L. 1758) and Unmanaged Bees in Three Italian National Parks
title_sort pollen resource repartition between managed honey bees i apis mellifera i l 1758 and unmanaged bees in three italian national parks
topic bee pastures
interspecific trophic competition
managed bees
palynological analysis
pollen repartitioning
protected areas
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7159/5/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT chiarabenedettaboni pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT francescacoppola pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT simonasagona pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT marinoquaranta pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT simoneflaminio pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT paolobiella pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT stefanotempesti pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT annamartalazzeri pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT marcodisanto pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks
AT antoniofelicioli pollenresourcerepartitionbetweenmanagedhoneybeesiapismelliferail1758andunmanagedbeesinthreeitaliannationalparks