Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the quality and readability of patient education on congenital cataracts provided by Google, ChatGPT, and clinical doctors. Given the rarity of congenital cataracts and the need for accessible, accurate information for parents, we sought to evaluate the platforms’...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuanqiao Lin, Lifang Bai, Xiaohuan Zhao, Lei Cai, Jin Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2025.1548385/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849736334725349376
author Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
author_facet Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
author_sort Xuanqiao Lin
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the quality and readability of patient education on congenital cataracts provided by Google, ChatGPT, and clinical doctors. Given the rarity of congenital cataracts and the need for accessible, accurate information for parents, we sought to evaluate the platforms’ effectiveness in delivering relevant health information.Methods and analysisWe developed two question banks related to congenital cataracts from different sources. Responses from Google, ChatGPT, and two doctors were evaluated across five criteria: correctness, completeness, readability, helpfulness, and safety. An ophthalmologist panel used a five-point Likert scale to score these responses. The readability of responses was also assessed using passage and readability statistics, with additional readability enhancements applied to ChatGPT responses.ResultsThe ChatGPT responses demonstrated similar quality to those from experienced doctors, particularly excelling in readability, which was enhanced further with simplification techniques. Resident doctors provided the most readable doctor responses, while Google results scored the lowest across all five evaluative criteria. Post-enhancement, ChatGPT responses showed significant improvements in readability and maintained response quality.ConclusionChatGPT is a promising tool for delivering accessible, accurate information on congenital cataracts, especially for populations with lower health literacy. This study underscores the value of AI in healthcare education for rare conditions and highlights the need for consulting multiple information sources for comprehensive health guidance. ChatGPT, with readability enhancements, stands out as a particularly effective resource for public health information on congenital cataracts.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7ee48b0e52b40d08e8f76883a6fb360
institution DOAJ
issn 2624-8212
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
spelling doaj-art-c7ee48b0e52b40d08e8f76883a6fb3602025-08-20T03:07:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence2624-82122025-06-01810.3389/frai.2025.15483851548385Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to realityXuanqiao Lin0Xuanqiao Lin1Xuanqiao Lin2Xuanqiao Lin3Lifang Bai4Lifang Bai5Lifang Bai6Lifang Bai7Xiaohuan Zhao8Xiaohuan Zhao9Xiaohuan Zhao10Xiaohuan Zhao11Lei Cai12Lei Cai13Lei Cai14Lei Cai15Jin Yang16Jin Yang17Jin Yang18Jin Yang19Department of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaKey Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, ChinaVisual Rehabilitation Professional Committee, Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaKey Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, ChinaVisual Rehabilitation Professional Committee, Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaKey Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, ChinaVisual Rehabilitation Professional Committee, Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaKey Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, ChinaVisual Rehabilitation Professional Committee, Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaKey Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, ChinaVisual Rehabilitation Professional Committee, Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the quality and readability of patient education on congenital cataracts provided by Google, ChatGPT, and clinical doctors. Given the rarity of congenital cataracts and the need for accessible, accurate information for parents, we sought to evaluate the platforms’ effectiveness in delivering relevant health information.Methods and analysisWe developed two question banks related to congenital cataracts from different sources. Responses from Google, ChatGPT, and two doctors were evaluated across five criteria: correctness, completeness, readability, helpfulness, and safety. An ophthalmologist panel used a five-point Likert scale to score these responses. The readability of responses was also assessed using passage and readability statistics, with additional readability enhancements applied to ChatGPT responses.ResultsThe ChatGPT responses demonstrated similar quality to those from experienced doctors, particularly excelling in readability, which was enhanced further with simplification techniques. Resident doctors provided the most readable doctor responses, while Google results scored the lowest across all five evaluative criteria. Post-enhancement, ChatGPT responses showed significant improvements in readability and maintained response quality.ConclusionChatGPT is a promising tool for delivering accessible, accurate information on congenital cataracts, especially for populations with lower health literacy. This study underscores the value of AI in healthcare education for rare conditions and highlights the need for consulting multiple information sources for comprehensive health guidance. ChatGPT, with readability enhancements, stands out as a particularly effective resource for public health information on congenital cataracts.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2025.1548385/fullcongenital cataractslarge language modelshealth educationpublic health careartificial intelligence
spellingShingle Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Xuanqiao Lin
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Lifang Bai
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Xiaohuan Zhao
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Lei Cai
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
Jin Yang
Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
congenital cataracts
large language models
health education
public health care
artificial intelligence
title Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality
title_full Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality
title_fullStr Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality
title_full_unstemmed Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality
title_short Online platform vs. doctors: a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality
title_sort online platform vs doctors a comparative exploration of congenital cataract patient education from virtual to reality
topic congenital cataracts
large language models
health education
public health care
artificial intelligence
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2025.1548385/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xuanqiaolin onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT xuanqiaolin onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT xuanqiaolin onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT xuanqiaolin onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT lifangbai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT lifangbai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT lifangbai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT lifangbai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT xiaohuanzhao onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT xiaohuanzhao onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT xiaohuanzhao onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT xiaohuanzhao onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT leicai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT leicai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT leicai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT leicai onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT jinyang onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT jinyang onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT jinyang onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality
AT jinyang onlineplatformvsdoctorsacomparativeexplorationofcongenitalcataractpatienteducationfromvirtualtoreality