Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs

This work describes new dynamical simulations of terrestrial planet formation. The simulations started at the protoplanetary disk stage, when planetesimals formed and accreted into protoplanets, and continued past the late stage of giant impacts. We explored the effect of different parameters, such...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Nesvorný, Alessandro Morbidelli, William F. Bottke, Rogerio Deienno, Max Goldberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astronomical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/adf20a
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849228961942339584
author David Nesvorný
Alessandro Morbidelli
William F. Bottke
Rogerio Deienno
Max Goldberg
author_facet David Nesvorný
Alessandro Morbidelli
William F. Bottke
Rogerio Deienno
Max Goldberg
author_sort David Nesvorný
collection DOAJ
description This work describes new dynamical simulations of terrestrial planet formation. The simulations started at the protoplanetary disk stage, when planetesimals formed and accreted into protoplanets, and continued past the late stage of giant impacts. We explored the effect of different parameters, such as the initial radial distribution of planetesimals and Type-I migration of protoplanets, on the final results. In each case, a thousand simulations were completed to characterize the stochastic nature of the accretion process. In the model best able to satisfy various constraints, Mercury, Venus, and Earth accreted from planetesimals that formed early near the silicate sublimation line at ≃0.5 au and migrated by disk torques. For Venus and Earth to end up at 0.7–1 au, Type-I migration had to be directed outward, for example, as the magnetically driven winds reduced the surface gas density in the inner part of the disk. Mercury was left behind near the original ring location. We suggest that Mars and multiple Mars-sized protoplanets grew from a distinct outer source of planetesimals at 1.5–2 au. While many migrated inward to accrete onto the proto-Earth, our Mars was the lone survivor. This model explains: (1) the masses and orbits of the terrestrial planets, (2) the chemical composition of the Earth, where ∼70% and ∼30% come from reduced inner-ring and more-oxidized outer-ring materials, and (3) the isotopic differences of the Earth and Mars. It suggests that the Moon-forming impactor Theia plausibly shared a similar isotopic composition and accretion history with that of the proto-Earth.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7da774c87894a9fbce3090ecec33754
institution Kabale University
issn 1538-3881
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astronomical Journal
spelling doaj-art-c7da774c87894a9fbce3090ecec337542025-08-22T11:25:12ZengIOP PublishingThe Astronomical Journal1538-38812025-01-01170318010.3847/1538-3881/adf20aTerrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source ReservoirsDavid Nesvorný0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-4301Alessandro Morbidelli1William F. Bottke2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1804-7814Rogerio Deienno3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6730-7857Max Goldberg4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-3663Solar System Science & Exploration Division, Southwest Research Institute , 1301 Walnut Street, Suite 400, Boulder, CO 80302, USALaboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université Côte d’Azur , CNRS, Observatoire de laCôte d’Azur, Bouldervard de l’Observatoire, 06304, Nice Cedex 4, FranceSolar System Science & Exploration Division, Southwest Research Institute , 1301 Walnut Street, Suite 400, Boulder, CO 80302, USASolar System Science & Exploration Division, Southwest Research Institute , 1301 Walnut Street, Suite 400, Boulder, CO 80302, USALaboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université Côte d’Azur , CNRS, Observatoire de laCôte d’Azur, Bouldervard de l’Observatoire, 06304, Nice Cedex 4, FranceThis work describes new dynamical simulations of terrestrial planet formation. The simulations started at the protoplanetary disk stage, when planetesimals formed and accreted into protoplanets, and continued past the late stage of giant impacts. We explored the effect of different parameters, such as the initial radial distribution of planetesimals and Type-I migration of protoplanets, on the final results. In each case, a thousand simulations were completed to characterize the stochastic nature of the accretion process. In the model best able to satisfy various constraints, Mercury, Venus, and Earth accreted from planetesimals that formed early near the silicate sublimation line at ≃0.5 au and migrated by disk torques. For Venus and Earth to end up at 0.7–1 au, Type-I migration had to be directed outward, for example, as the magnetically driven winds reduced the surface gas density in the inner part of the disk. Mercury was left behind near the original ring location. We suggest that Mars and multiple Mars-sized protoplanets grew from a distinct outer source of planetesimals at 1.5–2 au. While many migrated inward to accrete onto the proto-Earth, our Mars was the lone survivor. This model explains: (1) the masses and orbits of the terrestrial planets, (2) the chemical composition of the Earth, where ∼70% and ∼30% come from reduced inner-ring and more-oxidized outer-ring materials, and (3) the isotopic differences of the Earth and Mars. It suggests that the Moon-forming impactor Theia plausibly shared a similar isotopic composition and accretion history with that of the proto-Earth.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/adf20aPlanet formationSolar system terrestrial planetsPlanetary migrationEarth-moon systemCosmochemistry
spellingShingle David Nesvorný
Alessandro Morbidelli
William F. Bottke
Rogerio Deienno
Max Goldberg
Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs
The Astronomical Journal
Planet formation
Solar system terrestrial planets
Planetary migration
Earth-moon system
Cosmochemistry
title Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs
title_full Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs
title_fullStr Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs
title_full_unstemmed Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs
title_short Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs
title_sort terrestrial planet formation from two source reservoirs
topic Planet formation
Solar system terrestrial planets
Planetary migration
Earth-moon system
Cosmochemistry
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/adf20a
work_keys_str_mv AT davidnesvorny terrestrialplanetformationfromtwosourcereservoirs
AT alessandromorbidelli terrestrialplanetformationfromtwosourcereservoirs
AT williamfbottke terrestrialplanetformationfromtwosourcereservoirs
AT rogeriodeienno terrestrialplanetformationfromtwosourcereservoirs
AT maxgoldberg terrestrialplanetformationfromtwosourcereservoirs