Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients

IntroductionScaphoid non-union after failed primary surgery presents significant therapeutic challenges.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 52 patients (50 males; mean age 29.5 years) underwent secondary reconstructions (2009–2020) for proximal pole (38.5%, n = 20) and waist non-unions (61.5%, n = 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Rachunek-Medved, C. Illg, A. Einzmann, J. T. Thiel, A. Daigeler, F. Medved
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1454101/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850189840879976448
author K. Rachunek-Medved
C. Illg
A. Einzmann
J. T. Thiel
A. Daigeler
F. Medved
author_facet K. Rachunek-Medved
C. Illg
A. Einzmann
J. T. Thiel
A. Daigeler
F. Medved
author_sort K. Rachunek-Medved
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionScaphoid non-union after failed primary surgery presents significant therapeutic challenges.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 52 patients (50 males; mean age 29.5 years) underwent secondary reconstructions (2009–2020) for proximal pole (38.5%, n = 20) and waist non-unions (61.5%, n = 32). Treatments included non-vascularized iliac crest grafts (17 patients), vascularized pedicled distal radius grafts (26), and free medial femoral condyle flaps (9). Union and scaphoid alignment were assessed by CT, while carpal alignment and arthrosis were evaluated using radiographs. Statistical analysis employed chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and McNemar tests (R v4.4.2; p ≤ 0.05).ResultsUnion rates differed significantly between proximal pole (40%, 8/20) and waist non-unions (68.75%, 22/32; p = 0.04). Graft type (p = 0.616), osteosynthesis method (p = 0.827), age (p = 0.095), smoking (p = 0.582), avascular necrosis (p = 0.42), and prior surgeries (p = 0.974) showed no significant association with union. Proximal pole non-unions with AVN trended toward lower union (22.2% vs. 54.5% without AVN), though this was not statistically significant. In patients achieving union, scaphoid humpback deformity was corrected in 9/15 cases (p = 0.0348), and dorsal intercalated segment instability improved significantly (p = 0.0143). Functionally, the union group had an average extension-flexion of 112° (81% of the healthy wrist) and radial-/ulnar adduction of 40° (72% of the unaffected wrist), with grip strength averaging 42 kg (range 25.2-59.7) and a DASH score of 11 (range 0–67). The non-union group showed 114° extension-flexion (91% of the unaffected wrist) and 38° ulnar/radial abduction (78% of the healthy wrist), with grip strength averaging 46 kg (range 37.6-59.3; 89% of the unaffected wrist) and a DASH score of 10 (range 3–33).DiscussionSecondary scaphoid reconstruction demonstrates location-dependent success. The decision between secondary reconstruction, which aims to restore anatomical integrity, and salvage procedures, which prioritize predictable outcomes, hinges on balancing union potential, functional results, and patient preferences. A tailored approach remains essential to align treatment goals with individual needs.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7d9891c25104639aecc0ede4f0de161
institution OA Journals
issn 2296-875X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj-art-c7d9891c25104639aecc0ede4f0de1612025-08-20T02:15:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2025-05-011210.3389/fsurg.2025.14541011454101Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patientsK. Rachunek-MedvedC. IllgA. EinzmannJ. T. ThielA. DaigelerF. MedvedIntroductionScaphoid non-union after failed primary surgery presents significant therapeutic challenges.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 52 patients (50 males; mean age 29.5 years) underwent secondary reconstructions (2009–2020) for proximal pole (38.5%, n = 20) and waist non-unions (61.5%, n = 32). Treatments included non-vascularized iliac crest grafts (17 patients), vascularized pedicled distal radius grafts (26), and free medial femoral condyle flaps (9). Union and scaphoid alignment were assessed by CT, while carpal alignment and arthrosis were evaluated using radiographs. Statistical analysis employed chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and McNemar tests (R v4.4.2; p ≤ 0.05).ResultsUnion rates differed significantly between proximal pole (40%, 8/20) and waist non-unions (68.75%, 22/32; p = 0.04). Graft type (p = 0.616), osteosynthesis method (p = 0.827), age (p = 0.095), smoking (p = 0.582), avascular necrosis (p = 0.42), and prior surgeries (p = 0.974) showed no significant association with union. Proximal pole non-unions with AVN trended toward lower union (22.2% vs. 54.5% without AVN), though this was not statistically significant. In patients achieving union, scaphoid humpback deformity was corrected in 9/15 cases (p = 0.0348), and dorsal intercalated segment instability improved significantly (p = 0.0143). Functionally, the union group had an average extension-flexion of 112° (81% of the healthy wrist) and radial-/ulnar adduction of 40° (72% of the unaffected wrist), with grip strength averaging 42 kg (range 25.2-59.7) and a DASH score of 11 (range 0–67). The non-union group showed 114° extension-flexion (91% of the unaffected wrist) and 38° ulnar/radial abduction (78% of the healthy wrist), with grip strength averaging 46 kg (range 37.6-59.3; 89% of the unaffected wrist) and a DASH score of 10 (range 3–33).DiscussionSecondary scaphoid reconstruction demonstrates location-dependent success. The decision between secondary reconstruction, which aims to restore anatomical integrity, and salvage procedures, which prioritize predictable outcomes, hinges on balancing union potential, functional results, and patient preferences. A tailored approach remains essential to align treatment goals with individual needs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1454101/fullscaphoid non-unionSNAC wristscaphoid reconstructionrepeated scaphoid reconstructionbone graftingwrist
spellingShingle K. Rachunek-Medved
C. Illg
A. Einzmann
J. T. Thiel
A. Daigeler
F. Medved
Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients
Frontiers in Surgery
scaphoid non-union
SNAC wrist
scaphoid reconstruction
repeated scaphoid reconstruction
bone grafting
wrist
title Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients
title_full Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients
title_fullStr Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients
title_full_unstemmed Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients
title_short Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients
title_sort union rate and clinical outcomes of second try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction a retrospective single center cohort study of 52 patients
topic scaphoid non-union
SNAC wrist
scaphoid reconstruction
repeated scaphoid reconstruction
bone grafting
wrist
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1454101/full
work_keys_str_mv AT krachunekmedved unionrateandclinicaloutcomesofsecondtryscaphoidreconstructionsafterfailedprimaryscaphoidosteosynthesisorreconstructionaretrospectivesinglecentercohortstudyof52patients
AT cillg unionrateandclinicaloutcomesofsecondtryscaphoidreconstructionsafterfailedprimaryscaphoidosteosynthesisorreconstructionaretrospectivesinglecentercohortstudyof52patients
AT aeinzmann unionrateandclinicaloutcomesofsecondtryscaphoidreconstructionsafterfailedprimaryscaphoidosteosynthesisorreconstructionaretrospectivesinglecentercohortstudyof52patients
AT jtthiel unionrateandclinicaloutcomesofsecondtryscaphoidreconstructionsafterfailedprimaryscaphoidosteosynthesisorreconstructionaretrospectivesinglecentercohortstudyof52patients
AT adaigeler unionrateandclinicaloutcomesofsecondtryscaphoidreconstructionsafterfailedprimaryscaphoidosteosynthesisorreconstructionaretrospectivesinglecentercohortstudyof52patients
AT fmedved unionrateandclinicaloutcomesofsecondtryscaphoidreconstructionsafterfailedprimaryscaphoidosteosynthesisorreconstructionaretrospectivesinglecentercohortstudyof52patients