A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?

Anorexia affects millions of people worldwide, and treatments vary widely, with no definitive treatment guidelines. A network meta-analysis compared and contrasted existing treatments for chronically ill and elderly patients. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofia Korsavva, Filimena Borisova Valkova, Ignacio Calderon Perez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2025-07-01
Series:Geriatric Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pagepressjournals.org/gc/article/view/13659
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850073953292255232
author Sofia Korsavva
Filimena Borisova Valkova
Ignacio Calderon Perez
author_facet Sofia Korsavva
Filimena Borisova Valkova
Ignacio Calderon Perez
author_sort Sofia Korsavva
collection DOAJ
description Anorexia affects millions of people worldwide, and treatments vary widely, with no definitive treatment guidelines. A network meta-analysis compared and contrasted existing treatments for chronically ill and elderly patients. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles reporting weight/body mass index changes pre- and post-treatment in the last 65 years. The target population was anorectic adults with chronic long-term illness (cancer, HIV, cystic fibrosis) or the elderly (ages over 65). Outcomes using pooled-weighted-standard-mean effect sizes were analyzed using a random effects model with Bayesian and frequentist methods. Meta-regressions with artificial neural nets were used to validate results and predict response to treatments. A total of 74 studies were included in the network meta-analysis out of the retrieved 340 articles, and 16,390 patients were analyzed in total. The random effects model calculated a pooled-weighted-effect size (p<0.0001) for olanzapine [0.87, confidence interval (CI) 95% (0.66-0.97)], for megestrol acetate high-dose [0.72, CI 95% (0.53-0.91)], for anamorelin [0.56, CI 95% (0.36-0.77)], for megestrol acetate low-dose [0.47, CI 95% (0.25-0.69)], for mirtazapine [0.42, CI 95% (0.13-0.72)], and for nutritional supplementation [0.45, CI 95% (0.29-0.61)]. Cannabinoids, cyproheptadine, other antidepressants, and steroids did not perform well. Between-study heterogeneity was tau-squared (τ2)=0.03. Subgroup analysis indicates that olanzapine is most effective for cancer patients, followed by megestrol acetate in high doses and anamorelin. Results were inconclusive for other patient groups. Olanzapine-induced weight gain is an adverse drug reaction that can be explained by pharmacogenomics affecting gut-microbiota dysbiosis. Compared to megestrol acetate and anamorelin, it has fewer side effects, improves sleep and mood, and has proven anti-nausea/anti-vomiting effects in chemotherapy. Furthermore, it inhibits some types of cancer cells and can be cytotoxic. Drug repositioning of olanzapine and anamorelin for cancer, elderly, HIV, and cystic fibrosis patients as orexigenic agents should be explored further. Appropriate nutritional supplementation should augment anorexia treatments.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7b67b592372447caa8f122a8e763dbd
institution DOAJ
issn 2465-1109
2465-1397
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format Article
series Geriatric Care
spelling doaj-art-c7b67b592372447caa8f122a8e763dbd2025-08-20T02:46:40ZengPAGEPress PublicationsGeriatric Care2465-11092465-13972025-07-0111210.4081/gc.2025.13659A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?Sofia Korsavva0Filimena Borisova Valkova1Ignacio Calderon Perez2Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; Western Health and Social Care Trust, Altnagelvin Hospital, LondonderrySt. Helier Hospital Jersey, St. HelierAarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Anorexia affects millions of people worldwide, and treatments vary widely, with no definitive treatment guidelines. A network meta-analysis compared and contrasted existing treatments for chronically ill and elderly patients. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles reporting weight/body mass index changes pre- and post-treatment in the last 65 years. The target population was anorectic adults with chronic long-term illness (cancer, HIV, cystic fibrosis) or the elderly (ages over 65). Outcomes using pooled-weighted-standard-mean effect sizes were analyzed using a random effects model with Bayesian and frequentist methods. Meta-regressions with artificial neural nets were used to validate results and predict response to treatments. A total of 74 studies were included in the network meta-analysis out of the retrieved 340 articles, and 16,390 patients were analyzed in total. The random effects model calculated a pooled-weighted-effect size (p<0.0001) for olanzapine [0.87, confidence interval (CI) 95% (0.66-0.97)], for megestrol acetate high-dose [0.72, CI 95% (0.53-0.91)], for anamorelin [0.56, CI 95% (0.36-0.77)], for megestrol acetate low-dose [0.47, CI 95% (0.25-0.69)], for mirtazapine [0.42, CI 95% (0.13-0.72)], and for nutritional supplementation [0.45, CI 95% (0.29-0.61)]. Cannabinoids, cyproheptadine, other antidepressants, and steroids did not perform well. Between-study heterogeneity was tau-squared (τ2)=0.03. Subgroup analysis indicates that olanzapine is most effective for cancer patients, followed by megestrol acetate in high doses and anamorelin. Results were inconclusive for other patient groups. Olanzapine-induced weight gain is an adverse drug reaction that can be explained by pharmacogenomics affecting gut-microbiota dysbiosis. Compared to megestrol acetate and anamorelin, it has fewer side effects, improves sleep and mood, and has proven anti-nausea/anti-vomiting effects in chemotherapy. Furthermore, it inhibits some types of cancer cells and can be cytotoxic. Drug repositioning of olanzapine and anamorelin for cancer, elderly, HIV, and cystic fibrosis patients as orexigenic agents should be explored further. Appropriate nutritional supplementation should augment anorexia treatments. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/gc/article/view/13659Old-agecanceranorexiapharmacogenomicsmachine-learning
spellingShingle Sofia Korsavva
Filimena Borisova Valkova
Ignacio Calderon Perez
A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?
Geriatric Care
Old-age
cancer
anorexia
pharmacogenomics
machine-learning
title A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?
title_full A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?
title_fullStr A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?
title_full_unstemmed A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?
title_short A network meta-analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age: pharmacogenomics, the gut-brain axis and artificial neural nets. Where are we?
title_sort network meta analysis of anorexia treatments in disease and old age pharmacogenomics the gut brain axis and artificial neural nets where are we
topic Old-age
cancer
anorexia
pharmacogenomics
machine-learning
url https://www.pagepressjournals.org/gc/article/view/13659
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiakorsavva anetworkmetaanalysisofanorexiatreatmentsindiseaseandoldagepharmacogenomicsthegutbrainaxisandartificialneuralnetswherearewe
AT filimenaborisovavalkova anetworkmetaanalysisofanorexiatreatmentsindiseaseandoldagepharmacogenomicsthegutbrainaxisandartificialneuralnetswherearewe
AT ignaciocalderonperez anetworkmetaanalysisofanorexiatreatmentsindiseaseandoldagepharmacogenomicsthegutbrainaxisandartificialneuralnetswherearewe
AT sofiakorsavva networkmetaanalysisofanorexiatreatmentsindiseaseandoldagepharmacogenomicsthegutbrainaxisandartificialneuralnetswherearewe
AT filimenaborisovavalkova networkmetaanalysisofanorexiatreatmentsindiseaseandoldagepharmacogenomicsthegutbrainaxisandartificialneuralnetswherearewe
AT ignaciocalderonperez networkmetaanalysisofanorexiatreatmentsindiseaseandoldagepharmacogenomicsthegutbrainaxisandartificialneuralnetswherearewe