“The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial

Abstract Background Emergence agitation EA is a state of confusion and harmful aggressiveness during recovery. It is a common complication after rhinoplasty, with risk of trauma, bleeding, and hemodynamic instability. Dexmedetomidine and gabapentin premedication could improve the quality of recovery...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamer Samir Abdelsalam Abdelaziz, Hatem Elsayed Mohammed Elsayed, Doaa Mohammed Kamal Eldin, Ismail Mohammed Ibrahim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02914-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571404530221056
author Tamer Samir Abdelsalam Abdelaziz
Hatem Elsayed Mohammed Elsayed
Doaa Mohammed Kamal Eldin
Ismail Mohammed Ibrahim
author_facet Tamer Samir Abdelsalam Abdelaziz
Hatem Elsayed Mohammed Elsayed
Doaa Mohammed Kamal Eldin
Ismail Mohammed Ibrahim
author_sort Tamer Samir Abdelsalam Abdelaziz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Emergence agitation EA is a state of confusion and harmful aggressiveness during recovery. It is a common complication after rhinoplasty, with risk of trauma, bleeding, and hemodynamic instability. Dexmedetomidine and gabapentin premedication could improve the quality of recovery after rhinoplasty. Methods One hundred fifty-three participants (ASA I-II, both sexes and age 18–40 years) scheduled for rhinoplasty were randomized into three groups. Group C didn’t receive premedication, Group D received intramuscular (IM) dexmedetomidine, and Group G received oral gabapentin. The degree of EA by Riker sedation-agitation scale (RSAS) during recovery, pain severity, and adverse events recorded. Results The results showed statistically significant differences in EA scores with the lowest values in group D (p-value 0.002). Moreover, the incidence of EA was 17.6% (9/51) in Group D, 41.2% (21/51) in Group G, and 56.9% (29/51) in Group C with P value < 0.001 and significant differences in VAS score at 4, 8, and 12 h with the highest median (range) values in group C 4(3–6) in comparison to group D 2(1–3) and group G 2(1–3) and p-value < 0.001; no significant differences in adverse events. Conclusions IM dexmedetomidine premedication was more efficient than gabapentin in the reduction of the emergence agitation incidence, severity, and postoperative pain scores after rhinoplasty in adults. Clinical trial registration number ID NCT05626998 on 25/11/2022.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7955ad84133464e8588f02786da7efd
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2253
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj-art-c7955ad84133464e8588f02786da7efd2025-02-02T12:40:03ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532025-01-012511610.1186/s12871-025-02914-5“The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trialTamer Samir Abdelsalam Abdelaziz0Hatem Elsayed Mohammed Elsayed1Doaa Mohammed Kamal Eldin2Ismail Mohammed Ibrahim3 Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityAbstract Background Emergence agitation EA is a state of confusion and harmful aggressiveness during recovery. It is a common complication after rhinoplasty, with risk of trauma, bleeding, and hemodynamic instability. Dexmedetomidine and gabapentin premedication could improve the quality of recovery after rhinoplasty. Methods One hundred fifty-three participants (ASA I-II, both sexes and age 18–40 years) scheduled for rhinoplasty were randomized into three groups. Group C didn’t receive premedication, Group D received intramuscular (IM) dexmedetomidine, and Group G received oral gabapentin. The degree of EA by Riker sedation-agitation scale (RSAS) during recovery, pain severity, and adverse events recorded. Results The results showed statistically significant differences in EA scores with the lowest values in group D (p-value 0.002). Moreover, the incidence of EA was 17.6% (9/51) in Group D, 41.2% (21/51) in Group G, and 56.9% (29/51) in Group C with P value < 0.001 and significant differences in VAS score at 4, 8, and 12 h with the highest median (range) values in group C 4(3–6) in comparison to group D 2(1–3) and group G 2(1–3) and p-value < 0.001; no significant differences in adverse events. Conclusions IM dexmedetomidine premedication was more efficient than gabapentin in the reduction of the emergence agitation incidence, severity, and postoperative pain scores after rhinoplasty in adults. Clinical trial registration number ID NCT05626998 on 25/11/2022.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02914-5DexmedetomidineEmergence agitationGabapentinGeneral anesthesiaPostoperative painRhinoplasty
spellingShingle Tamer Samir Abdelsalam Abdelaziz
Hatem Elsayed Mohammed Elsayed
Doaa Mohammed Kamal Eldin
Ismail Mohammed Ibrahim
“The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial
BMC Anesthesiology
Dexmedetomidine
Emergence agitation
Gabapentin
General anesthesia
Postoperative pain
Rhinoplasty
title “The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial
title_full “The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial
title_fullStr “The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed “The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial
title_short “The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty”. A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial
title_sort the effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty a prospective randomized double blind controlled trial
topic Dexmedetomidine
Emergence agitation
Gabapentin
General anesthesia
Postoperative pain
Rhinoplasty
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02914-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tamersamirabdelsalamabdelaziz theeffectofintramusculardexmedetomidineversusoralgabapentinpremedicationontheemergenceagitationafterrhinoplastyaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT hatemelsayedmohammedelsayed theeffectofintramusculardexmedetomidineversusoralgabapentinpremedicationontheemergenceagitationafterrhinoplastyaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT doaamohammedkamaleldin theeffectofintramusculardexmedetomidineversusoralgabapentinpremedicationontheemergenceagitationafterrhinoplastyaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT ismailmohammedibrahim theeffectofintramusculardexmedetomidineversusoralgabapentinpremedicationontheemergenceagitationafterrhinoplastyaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial