A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture
Swidden (aka ‘slash-and-burn’) agriculture is a prototypical-coupled human and natural system. Despite this, mathematical models integrating its social and ecological dynamics are rare. Here, we use complex adaptive systems theory to develop a model where individuals rely on labour exchange driven b...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Royal Society
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.242197 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850260372400898048 |
|---|---|
| author | Denis Tverskoi Shane A. Scaggs Sean S. Downey |
| author_facet | Denis Tverskoi Shane A. Scaggs Sean S. Downey |
| author_sort | Denis Tverskoi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Swidden (aka ‘slash-and-burn’) agriculture is a prototypical-coupled human and natural system. Despite this, mathematical models integrating its social and ecological dynamics are rare. Here, we use complex adaptive systems theory to develop a model where individuals rely on labour exchange driven by reciprocity and normative reasoning that can lead to sanctions. Our results identify three emergent regimes: low-intensity swidden, sustainable high-intensity swidden that maximizes ecosystem services and harvest returns, and deforestation. We show that sustainable high-intensity swidden evolves if labour reciprocity and normative reasoning are balanced: helping behaviour should be significantly conditioned by normative reasoning to prevent over-harvesting, while reciprocity is necessary to prevent excessive sanctioning. We find that the sustainable high-intensity swidden regime is robust to changes in group size, is resilient to environmental shocks, can evolve under various models of forest ecology and is most productive for both forests and farmers when the balance of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning results in an intermediate scale of forest disturbance. Overall, we illuminate the importance of Indigenous social norms and customary practices related to swidden labour in maintaining sustainable and intensive swidden agriculture. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c7040a5733b141748677cfdd10fd79d8 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2054-5703 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | The Royal Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Royal Society Open Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-c7040a5733b141748677cfdd10fd79d82025-08-20T01:55:38ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032025-05-0112510.1098/rsos.242197A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agricultureDenis Tverskoi0Shane A. Scaggs1Sean S. Downey2Health and Environment Modeling Lab, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USAHealth and Environment Modeling Lab, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USAHealth and Environment Modeling Lab, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USASwidden (aka ‘slash-and-burn’) agriculture is a prototypical-coupled human and natural system. Despite this, mathematical models integrating its social and ecological dynamics are rare. Here, we use complex adaptive systems theory to develop a model where individuals rely on labour exchange driven by reciprocity and normative reasoning that can lead to sanctions. Our results identify three emergent regimes: low-intensity swidden, sustainable high-intensity swidden that maximizes ecosystem services and harvest returns, and deforestation. We show that sustainable high-intensity swidden evolves if labour reciprocity and normative reasoning are balanced: helping behaviour should be significantly conditioned by normative reasoning to prevent over-harvesting, while reciprocity is necessary to prevent excessive sanctioning. We find that the sustainable high-intensity swidden regime is robust to changes in group size, is resilient to environmental shocks, can evolve under various models of forest ecology and is most productive for both forests and farmers when the balance of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning results in an intermediate scale of forest disturbance. Overall, we illuminate the importance of Indigenous social norms and customary practices related to swidden labour in maintaining sustainable and intensive swidden agriculture.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.242197swidden agricultureIndigenous societiescomplex adaptive systemssustainability sciencemathematical modellingcultural evolution |
| spellingShingle | Denis Tverskoi Shane A. Scaggs Sean S. Downey A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture Royal Society Open Science swidden agriculture Indigenous societies complex adaptive systems sustainability science mathematical modelling cultural evolution |
| title | A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture |
| title_full | A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture |
| title_fullStr | A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture |
| title_full_unstemmed | A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture |
| title_short | A complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture |
| title_sort | complex adaptive systems model of labour reciprocity and normative reasoning in swidden agriculture |
| topic | swidden agriculture Indigenous societies complex adaptive systems sustainability science mathematical modelling cultural evolution |
| url | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.242197 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT denistverskoi acomplexadaptivesystemsmodeloflabourreciprocityandnormativereasoninginswiddenagriculture AT shaneascaggs acomplexadaptivesystemsmodeloflabourreciprocityandnormativereasoninginswiddenagriculture AT seansdowney acomplexadaptivesystemsmodeloflabourreciprocityandnormativereasoninginswiddenagriculture AT denistverskoi complexadaptivesystemsmodeloflabourreciprocityandnormativereasoninginswiddenagriculture AT shaneascaggs complexadaptivesystemsmodeloflabourreciprocityandnormativereasoninginswiddenagriculture AT seansdowney complexadaptivesystemsmodeloflabourreciprocityandnormativereasoninginswiddenagriculture |