Evaluation of chip breaker designs on tool life and hole integrity in drilling of HFRP/Al composite
Abstract In this study, drilling of a newly developed lightweight fire-retardant carbon/glass-fiber-reinforced polymer epoxy sandwich that includes an aluminum honeycomb core with modified epoxy (HFRP/Al sandwich composite) is investigated. A new high-performance insert combination comprising centra...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03793-z |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract In this study, drilling of a newly developed lightweight fire-retardant carbon/glass-fiber-reinforced polymer epoxy sandwich that includes an aluminum honeycomb core with modified epoxy (HFRP/Al sandwich composite) is investigated. A new high-performance insert combination comprising central-stepped and peripheral-wiper inserts is evaluated. The geometry of the central insert is kept constant while two variations in chip breaker (C B ) designs are introduced on wiper inserts differentiated mainly based on C B width and C B depth. Variation one abbreviated as LM geometry has a C B depth of 65 μm and a C B width of 1000 μm while the second variation terms as GT geometry has a C B depth of 20 μm and a C B width of 720 μm. This study is conducted in two phases at a constant speed (CS) of 50 m/min in a dry-cutting environment. Phase I involved four tests, in each test ten holes are drilled with LM and GT geometries at two different feed rates (0.08 and 0.16 mm/rev). Based on reduced diametric error, and delamination, tests with a feed rate (FR) of 0.08 mm/rev are selected for Phase-II analysis, which involves the evaluation of tool life testing. The results in terms of tool life, diametric error, and delamination factors are reported. Notably, the GT geometry of the wiper inserts outperformed the LM geometry in terms of 33% higher tool life compared to its LM counterpart. In addition, the diametric error and delamination factor are substantially lower with the former geometry in comparison to the latter one. The better performance of GT geometry is attributed to its better chip flow and robust design. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2045-2322 |