Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 viral outbreak has been conflicts with the past-tense narrative elsewhere in the abstract.; the infodemic. Misinformation about the virus and disease it causes (COVID-19) has been linked with authority-questioning beliefs, co-branding with conspiracies, and other misinform...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma K. Quinn, Robert T. Duffy, Kristian Larsen, Maria Dalton, Cheryl E. Peters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Safety and Health at Work
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791124000817
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850070114288795648
author Emma K. Quinn
Robert T. Duffy
Kristian Larsen
Maria Dalton
Cheryl E. Peters
author_facet Emma K. Quinn
Robert T. Duffy
Kristian Larsen
Maria Dalton
Cheryl E. Peters
author_sort Emma K. Quinn
collection DOAJ
description Background: The SARS-CoV-2 viral outbreak has been conflicts with the past-tense narrative elsewhere in the abstract.; the infodemic. Misinformation about the virus and disease it causes (COVID-19) has been linked with authority-questioning beliefs, co-branding with conspiracies, and other misinformation across social media. Distrust in simple occupational and public health tools we have at our disposal (like well-fitting face masks) has proliferated. Despite attempts to curb the spread of untrue or misleading information on COVID-19, this messaging persists on social media. Methods: Using a clean and cleared account, the 300 top posts under the hashtag #masksdontwork were collected on Instagram for thematic analysis over three weeks in June 2022, with three separate data collection dates. Themes contained in the posts were independently assessed by two coders and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Results: The most dominant theme among posts was mistrust, including “government lies” and “media lies.” Anti-masking rhetoric was the second most frequent theme, where “freedom” and “disbelief in data” were common sub-themes. Conclusion: Science denial and propaganda shared among Instagram users may represent an onramp to consumption of broader conspiracy theories and government distrust, in addition to having negative health effects and social consequences for workers regardless of whether they wear masks. Social media algorithms promote similar misinformation or authority-questioning beliefs to users who view related content. Addressing the spread of health-related misinformation can assist in deconstructing myths and increasing trust in public health authorities and prevent the spread of communicable diseases among workers and the public.
format Article
id doaj-art-c6f7115bad4e46c19b5b200aca79cce5
institution DOAJ
issn 2093-7911
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Safety and Health at Work
spelling doaj-art-c6f7115bad4e46c19b5b200aca79cce52025-08-20T02:47:37ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112025-03-01161273510.1016/j.shaw.2024.11.002Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 PandemicEmma K. Quinn0Robert T. Duffy1Kristian Larsen2Maria Dalton3Cheryl E. Peters4School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Corresponding author. 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z5, Canada.School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaDepartment of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Community Health Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, CanadaBackground: The SARS-CoV-2 viral outbreak has been conflicts with the past-tense narrative elsewhere in the abstract.; the infodemic. Misinformation about the virus and disease it causes (COVID-19) has been linked with authority-questioning beliefs, co-branding with conspiracies, and other misinformation across social media. Distrust in simple occupational and public health tools we have at our disposal (like well-fitting face masks) has proliferated. Despite attempts to curb the spread of untrue or misleading information on COVID-19, this messaging persists on social media. Methods: Using a clean and cleared account, the 300 top posts under the hashtag #masksdontwork were collected on Instagram for thematic analysis over three weeks in June 2022, with three separate data collection dates. Themes contained in the posts were independently assessed by two coders and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Results: The most dominant theme among posts was mistrust, including “government lies” and “media lies.” Anti-masking rhetoric was the second most frequent theme, where “freedom” and “disbelief in data” were common sub-themes. Conclusion: Science denial and propaganda shared among Instagram users may represent an onramp to consumption of broader conspiracy theories and government distrust, in addition to having negative health effects and social consequences for workers regardless of whether they wear masks. Social media algorithms promote similar misinformation or authority-questioning beliefs to users who view related content. Addressing the spread of health-related misinformation can assist in deconstructing myths and increasing trust in public health authorities and prevent the spread of communicable diseases among workers and the public.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791124000817COVID-19InfodemicMasksMisinformationSocial media
spellingShingle Emma K. Quinn
Robert T. Duffy
Kristian Larsen
Maria Dalton
Cheryl E. Peters
Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Safety and Health at Work
COVID-19
Infodemic
Masks
Misinformation
Social media
title Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short Anti-masking Posts on Instagram: Content Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort anti masking posts on instagram content analysis during the covid 19 pandemic
topic COVID-19
Infodemic
Masks
Misinformation
Social media
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791124000817
work_keys_str_mv AT emmakquinn antimaskingpostsoninstagramcontentanalysisduringthecovid19pandemic
AT roberttduffy antimaskingpostsoninstagramcontentanalysisduringthecovid19pandemic
AT kristianlarsen antimaskingpostsoninstagramcontentanalysisduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mariadalton antimaskingpostsoninstagramcontentanalysisduringthecovid19pandemic
AT cherylepeters antimaskingpostsoninstagramcontentanalysisduringthecovid19pandemic