Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis

ABSTRACT Background Bone metastases are highly refractory and are associated with extremely poor survival. Despite the increasing incidence of bone metastasis in gastric cancer (GC), comprehensive analyses regarding the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and treatment of bone‐metastatic GC rem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shiji Ren, Yutao Wei, Wenqi Liu, Yipeng Zhang, Yue Wang, Ju Yang, Baorui Liu, Tao Shi, Jia Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-03-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70781
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849724724815331328
author Shiji Ren
Yutao Wei
Wenqi Liu
Yipeng Zhang
Yue Wang
Ju Yang
Baorui Liu
Tao Shi
Jia Wei
author_facet Shiji Ren
Yutao Wei
Wenqi Liu
Yipeng Zhang
Yue Wang
Ju Yang
Baorui Liu
Tao Shi
Jia Wei
author_sort Shiji Ren
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Bone metastases are highly refractory and are associated with extremely poor survival. Despite the increasing incidence of bone metastasis in gastric cancer (GC), comprehensive analyses regarding the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and treatment of bone‐metastatic GC remain limited. Methods We obtained data from 120 bone‐metastatic GC patients from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital and 36,139 GC patients from the SEER database. Chi‐square and Mann–Whitney U‐tests evaluated clinicopathological features, while Cox models identified prognostic factors. Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots assessed the effects of different treatment strategies on overall survival after bone metastasis (OS‐BM). Results Among 120 bone‐metastatic GC patients, 55 (45.83%) were diagnosed with poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma (PCC). The higher incidence of bone metastasis was also observed in SRCC patients from the SEER database (p < 0.0001). PCC patients exhibited distinct pathological features compared to non‐PCC patients, including lower PD‐L1 (p = 0.042) and E‐cadherin expression (p = 0.049). Multivariate analysis identified various negative prognostic factors such as metachronous bone metastasis (p < 0.001, HR = 2.35, 95% CI:1.47–3.74) and CA125 expression (p = 0.036, HR = 1.60, 95% CI:1.03–2.48), whereas immunotherapy was a positive prognostic factor (p < 0.001, HR = 0.44, 95% CI:0.29–0.66). Subgroup analysis also showed improved survival among different populations of bone‐metastatic GC patients receiving immunotherapy. Moreover, combinational therapies including immunotherapy and other treatments (anti‐angiogenic therapy and/or local radiotherapy) further improved patient OS‐BM. Conclusion Our results suggest bone‐metastatic GC patients exhibit distinct clinicopathological features, with a high incidence of bone metastasis in PCC. Immunotherapy‐based combination therapies offer improved survival benefits, thus supporting the application of immunotherapy in GC patients at high risk of bone metastasis.
format Article
id doaj-art-c6f140e0fd264b3f9ab77bbedbbb9e2b
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-c6f140e0fd264b3f9ab77bbedbbb9e2b2025-08-20T03:10:39ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342025-03-01146n/an/a10.1002/cam4.70781Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective AnalysisShiji Ren0Yutao Wei1Wenqi Liu2Yipeng Zhang3Yue Wang4Ju Yang5Baorui Liu6Tao Shi7Jia Wei8Department of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaDepartment of Oncology Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaABSTRACT Background Bone metastases are highly refractory and are associated with extremely poor survival. Despite the increasing incidence of bone metastasis in gastric cancer (GC), comprehensive analyses regarding the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and treatment of bone‐metastatic GC remain limited. Methods We obtained data from 120 bone‐metastatic GC patients from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital and 36,139 GC patients from the SEER database. Chi‐square and Mann–Whitney U‐tests evaluated clinicopathological features, while Cox models identified prognostic factors. Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots assessed the effects of different treatment strategies on overall survival after bone metastasis (OS‐BM). Results Among 120 bone‐metastatic GC patients, 55 (45.83%) were diagnosed with poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma (PCC). The higher incidence of bone metastasis was also observed in SRCC patients from the SEER database (p < 0.0001). PCC patients exhibited distinct pathological features compared to non‐PCC patients, including lower PD‐L1 (p = 0.042) and E‐cadherin expression (p = 0.049). Multivariate analysis identified various negative prognostic factors such as metachronous bone metastasis (p < 0.001, HR = 2.35, 95% CI:1.47–3.74) and CA125 expression (p = 0.036, HR = 1.60, 95% CI:1.03–2.48), whereas immunotherapy was a positive prognostic factor (p < 0.001, HR = 0.44, 95% CI:0.29–0.66). Subgroup analysis also showed improved survival among different populations of bone‐metastatic GC patients receiving immunotherapy. Moreover, combinational therapies including immunotherapy and other treatments (anti‐angiogenic therapy and/or local radiotherapy) further improved patient OS‐BM. Conclusion Our results suggest bone‐metastatic GC patients exhibit distinct clinicopathological features, with a high incidence of bone metastasis in PCC. Immunotherapy‐based combination therapies offer improved survival benefits, thus supporting the application of immunotherapy in GC patients at high risk of bone metastasis.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70781bone metastasisgastric cancerimmunotherapypoorly cohesiveprognosis
spellingShingle Shiji Ren
Yutao Wei
Wenqi Liu
Yipeng Zhang
Yue Wang
Ju Yang
Baorui Liu
Tao Shi
Jia Wei
Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis
Cancer Medicine
bone metastasis
gastric cancer
immunotherapy
poorly cohesive
prognosis
title Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis
title_short Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Strategies in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis
title_sort clinical characteristics prognostic factors and therapeutic strategies in gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis a retrospective analysis
topic bone metastasis
gastric cancer
immunotherapy
poorly cohesive
prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70781
work_keys_str_mv AT shijiren clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yutaowei clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT wenqiliu clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yipengzhang clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yuewang clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT juyang clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT baoruiliu clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT taoshi clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis
AT jiawei clinicalcharacteristicsprognosticfactorsandtherapeuticstrategiesingastriccancerpatientswithbonemetastasisaretrospectiveanalysis