Paleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilism

Abstract Plate tectonics is a unique feature of Earth, but its proposed time of initiation is still controversial, with published estimates ranging from ca. 4.2 to 0.7 Ga. Paleomagnetic data can provide a robust argument for one essential aspect of plate tectonics: large-scale relative lateral motio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jikai Ding, Chris Rogers, Ulf Söderlund, David A. D. Evans, Zheng Gong, Richard E. Ernst, Kevin Chamberlain, Taylor Kilian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-12-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55117-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559314786942976
author Jikai Ding
Chris Rogers
Ulf Söderlund
David A. D. Evans
Zheng Gong
Richard E. Ernst
Kevin Chamberlain
Taylor Kilian
author_facet Jikai Ding
Chris Rogers
Ulf Söderlund
David A. D. Evans
Zheng Gong
Richard E. Ernst
Kevin Chamberlain
Taylor Kilian
author_sort Jikai Ding
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Plate tectonics is a unique feature of Earth, but its proposed time of initiation is still controversial, with published estimates ranging from ca. 4.2 to 0.7 Ga. Paleomagnetic data can provide a robust argument for one essential aspect of plate tectonics: large-scale relative lateral motions of distinct, rigid crustal blocks. Previously, the oldest relative horizontal motion between two or more blocks was constrained to a broad age interval of ca. 2.7–2.17 Ga using paleomagnetic data. In this study, we obtain a robust ca. 2.48 Ga paleomagnetic pole from Wyoming craton. Combining this result with the ca. 2.7–2.17 Ga apparent polar wander paths from Wyoming and Superior cratons, we suggest that they assembled during ca. 2.7–2.5 Ga and remained directly juxtaposed until ca. 2.17 Ga. Tectonostratigraphic data and geological proxies also suggest Wyoming and Superior collided at ca. 2.6 Ga. The results provide strong evidence for relative horizontal motion between crustal blocks during the Neoarchean. Together with other tectonic proxies, the data suggest plate mobilism in operation prior to 2.5 Ga.
format Article
id doaj-art-c6ebc1a0bace4cdc97f3da12492cb554
institution Kabale University
issn 2041-1723
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj-art-c6ebc1a0bace4cdc97f3da12492cb5542025-01-05T12:36:45ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232024-12-011511710.1038/s41467-024-55117-wPaleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilismJikai Ding0Chris Rogers1Ulf Söderlund2David A. D. Evans3Zheng Gong4Richard E. Ernst5Kevin Chamberlain6Taylor Kilian7Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Yale UniversityDepartment of Earth Sciences, Carleton UniversityDepartment of Geology, Lund UniversityDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Yale UniversityDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Yale UniversityDepartment of Earth Sciences, Carleton UniversityDepartment of Geology & Geophysics, University of WyomingKoBold MetalsAbstract Plate tectonics is a unique feature of Earth, but its proposed time of initiation is still controversial, with published estimates ranging from ca. 4.2 to 0.7 Ga. Paleomagnetic data can provide a robust argument for one essential aspect of plate tectonics: large-scale relative lateral motions of distinct, rigid crustal blocks. Previously, the oldest relative horizontal motion between two or more blocks was constrained to a broad age interval of ca. 2.7–2.17 Ga using paleomagnetic data. In this study, we obtain a robust ca. 2.48 Ga paleomagnetic pole from Wyoming craton. Combining this result with the ca. 2.7–2.17 Ga apparent polar wander paths from Wyoming and Superior cratons, we suggest that they assembled during ca. 2.7–2.5 Ga and remained directly juxtaposed until ca. 2.17 Ga. Tectonostratigraphic data and geological proxies also suggest Wyoming and Superior collided at ca. 2.6 Ga. The results provide strong evidence for relative horizontal motion between crustal blocks during the Neoarchean. Together with other tectonic proxies, the data suggest plate mobilism in operation prior to 2.5 Ga.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55117-w
spellingShingle Jikai Ding
Chris Rogers
Ulf Söderlund
David A. D. Evans
Zheng Gong
Richard E. Ernst
Kevin Chamberlain
Taylor Kilian
Paleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilism
Nature Communications
title Paleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilism
title_full Paleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilism
title_fullStr Paleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilism
title_full_unstemmed Paleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilism
title_short Paleomagnetic evidence for Neoarchean plate mobilism
title_sort paleomagnetic evidence for neoarchean plate mobilism
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55117-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jikaiding paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism
AT chrisrogers paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism
AT ulfsoderlund paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism
AT davidadevans paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism
AT zhenggong paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism
AT richardeernst paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism
AT kevinchamberlain paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism
AT taylorkilian paleomagneticevidenceforneoarcheanplatemobilism