Reliability of Average Daily Steps Measured Through a Consumer Smartwatch in Parkinson Disease Phenotypes, Stages, and Severities: Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract BackgroundAverage daily steps (avDS) could be a valuable indicator of real-world ambulation in people with Parkinson disease (PD), and previous studies have reported the validity and reliability of this measure. Nonetheless, no study has considered disease phenotype,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edoardo Bianchini, Domiziana Rinaldi, Lanfranco De Carolis, Silvia Galli, Marika Alborghetti, Clint Hansen, Antonio Suppa, Marco Salvetti, Francesco Ernesto Pontieri, Nicolas Vuillerme
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-03-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e63153
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract BackgroundAverage daily steps (avDS) could be a valuable indicator of real-world ambulation in people with Parkinson disease (PD), and previous studies have reported the validity and reliability of this measure. Nonetheless, no study has considered disease phenotype, stage, and severity when assessing the reliability of consumer wrist-worn devices to estimate daily step count in unsupervised, free-living conditions in PD. ObjectiveThis study aims to assess and compare the reliability of a consumer wrist-worn smartwatch (Garmin Vivosmart 4) in counting avDS in people with PD in unsupervised, free-living conditions among disease phenotypes, stages, and severity groups. MethodsA total of 104 people with PD were monitored through Garmin Vivosmart 4 for 5 consecutive days. Total daily steps were recorded and avDS were calculated. Participants were dichotomized into tremor dominant (TD; n=39) or postural instability and gait disorder (PIGD; n=65), presence (n=57) or absence (n=47) of tremor, and mild (n=65) or moderate (n=39) disease severity. Based on the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale (mHY), participants were further dichotomized into earlier (mHY 1‐2; n=68) or intermediate (mHY 2.5‐3; n=36) disease stages. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 3,k), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were used to evaluate the reliability of avDS for each subgroup. The threshold for acceptability was set at an ICC ≥0.8 with a lower bound of 95% CI ≥0.75. The 2-tailed Student t ResultsReliability of avDS measured through Garmin Vivosmart 4 for 5 consecutive days in unsupervised, free-living conditions was acceptable in the overall population with an ICC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85‐0.92), SEM below 10%, and an MDC of 1580 steps per day (27% of criterion). In all investigated subgroups, the reliability of avDS was also acceptable (ICC range 0.84‐0.94). However, ICCs were significantly lower in participants with tremor (PPP ConclusionsIn mild-to-moderate PD, avDS measured through a consumer smartwatch in unsupervised, free-living conditions for 5 consecutive days are reliable irrespective of disease phenotype, stage, and severity. However, in individuals with TD phenotype, tremor, mild disease severity, and earlier disease stages, reliability could be lower. These findings could facilitate a broader and informed implementation of avDS as an index of ambulatory activity in PD.
ISSN:2561-326X