Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins

This study investigates how three technical factors—steering wheel tilt, torque, and cabin vibration frequency—affect driver posture. Heavy-truck drivers often suffer from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), mainly due to poor cabin ergonomics and prolonged postures during work. In countries like Ecua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esteban Ortiz, Daysi Baño-Morales, William Venegas, Álvaro Page, Skarlet Guerra, Mateo Narváez, Iván Zambrano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/14/7775
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849714596478189568
author Esteban Ortiz
Daysi Baño-Morales
William Venegas
Álvaro Page
Skarlet Guerra
Mateo Narváez
Iván Zambrano
author_facet Esteban Ortiz
Daysi Baño-Morales
William Venegas
Álvaro Page
Skarlet Guerra
Mateo Narváez
Iván Zambrano
author_sort Esteban Ortiz
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates how three technical factors—steering wheel tilt, torque, and cabin vibration frequency—affect driver posture. Heavy-truck drivers often suffer from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), mainly due to poor cabin ergonomics and prolonged postures during work. In countries like Ecuador, making major structural changes to cabin design is not feasible. These factors were identified through video analysis and surveys from drivers at two Ecuadorian trucking companies. An experimental system was developed using a simplified cabin to control these variables, while posture and muscle activity were recorded in 16 participants using motion capture, inertial sensors, and electromyography (EMG) on the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, triceps brachii, quadriceps muscle, and gastrocnemius muscle. The test protocol simulated key truck-driving tasks. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0.05</mn></mrow></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>), with technical factors and mass index as independent variables, and posture metrics as dependent variables. Results showed that head mass index significantly affected head abduction–adduction (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>8.12 to <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>2.18°), and spine mass index influenced spine flexion–extension (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>0.38 to 6.99°). Among technical factors, steering wheel tilt impacted trunk flexion–extension (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>13.56 to 16.99°) and arm rotation (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>31.1 to 19.7°). Steering wheel torque affected arm rotation (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>30.49 to <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>6.77°), while vibration frequency influenced forearm flexion–extension (3.76 to 16.51°). EMG signals showed little variation between muscles, likely due to the protocol’s short duration. These findings offer quantitative support for improving cabin ergonomics in low-resource settings through targeted, cost-effective design changes.
format Article
id doaj-art-c6bcbbdc9cfe42b5ab91864c4cdc294d
institution DOAJ
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-c6bcbbdc9cfe42b5ab91864c4cdc294d2025-08-20T03:13:39ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-07-011514777510.3390/app15147775Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic CabinsEsteban Ortiz0Daysi Baño-Morales1William Venegas2Álvaro Page3Skarlet Guerra4Mateo Narváez5Iván Zambrano6Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, EcuadorGrupo de Ingeniería Automotriz, Movilidad y Transporte (GiAUTO), Carrera de Ingeniería Automotriz-Campus Sur, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito 170702, EcuadorDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, EcuadorInstituto Universitario de Ingeniería Mecánica y Biomecánica, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, SpainDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, EcuadorDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, EcuadorDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, EcuadorThis study investigates how three technical factors—steering wheel tilt, torque, and cabin vibration frequency—affect driver posture. Heavy-truck drivers often suffer from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), mainly due to poor cabin ergonomics and prolonged postures during work. In countries like Ecuador, making major structural changes to cabin design is not feasible. These factors were identified through video analysis and surveys from drivers at two Ecuadorian trucking companies. An experimental system was developed using a simplified cabin to control these variables, while posture and muscle activity were recorded in 16 participants using motion capture, inertial sensors, and electromyography (EMG) on the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, triceps brachii, quadriceps muscle, and gastrocnemius muscle. The test protocol simulated key truck-driving tasks. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0.05</mn></mrow></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>), with technical factors and mass index as independent variables, and posture metrics as dependent variables. Results showed that head mass index significantly affected head abduction–adduction (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>8.12 to <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>2.18°), and spine mass index influenced spine flexion–extension (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>0.38 to 6.99°). Among technical factors, steering wheel tilt impacted trunk flexion–extension (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>13.56 to 16.99°) and arm rotation (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>31.1 to 19.7°). Steering wheel torque affected arm rotation (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>30.49 to <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mo>−</mo></mstyle></semantics></math></inline-formula>6.77°), while vibration frequency influenced forearm flexion–extension (3.76 to 16.51°). EMG signals showed little variation between muscles, likely due to the protocol’s short duration. These findings offer quantitative support for improving cabin ergonomics in low-resource settings through targeted, cost-effective design changes.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/14/7775heavy-truck vehicle driversergonomicposturesEMG
spellingShingle Esteban Ortiz
Daysi Baño-Morales
William Venegas
Álvaro Page
Skarlet Guerra
Mateo Narváez
Iván Zambrano
Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins
Applied Sciences
heavy-truck vehicle drivers
ergonomic
postures
EMG
title Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins
title_full Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins
title_fullStr Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins
title_short Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins
title_sort evaluation of technical and anthropometric factors in postures and muscle activation of heavy truck vehicle drivers implications for the design of ergonomic cabins
topic heavy-truck vehicle drivers
ergonomic
postures
EMG
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/14/7775
work_keys_str_mv AT estebanortiz evaluationoftechnicalandanthropometricfactorsinposturesandmuscleactivationofheavytruckvehicledriversimplicationsforthedesignofergonomiccabins
AT daysibanomorales evaluationoftechnicalandanthropometricfactorsinposturesandmuscleactivationofheavytruckvehicledriversimplicationsforthedesignofergonomiccabins
AT williamvenegas evaluationoftechnicalandanthropometricfactorsinposturesandmuscleactivationofheavytruckvehicledriversimplicationsforthedesignofergonomiccabins
AT alvaropage evaluationoftechnicalandanthropometricfactorsinposturesandmuscleactivationofheavytruckvehicledriversimplicationsforthedesignofergonomiccabins
AT skarletguerra evaluationoftechnicalandanthropometricfactorsinposturesandmuscleactivationofheavytruckvehicledriversimplicationsforthedesignofergonomiccabins
AT mateonarvaez evaluationoftechnicalandanthropometricfactorsinposturesandmuscleactivationofheavytruckvehicledriversimplicationsforthedesignofergonomiccabins
AT ivanzambrano evaluationoftechnicalandanthropometricfactorsinposturesandmuscleactivationofheavytruckvehicledriversimplicationsforthedesignofergonomiccabins