Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature Predictions

Abstract The accelerated warming in the Arctic poses serious risks to freshwater ecosystems by altering streamflow and river thermal regimes. However, limited research on Arctic River water temperatures exists due to data scarcity and the absence of robust methodologies, which often focus on large,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuyu Y. Chang, Jon Schwenk, Kurt C. Solander
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Water Resources Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039053
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849425343984697344
author Shuyu Y. Chang
Jon Schwenk
Kurt C. Solander
author_facet Shuyu Y. Chang
Jon Schwenk
Kurt C. Solander
author_sort Shuyu Y. Chang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The accelerated warming in the Arctic poses serious risks to freshwater ecosystems by altering streamflow and river thermal regimes. However, limited research on Arctic River water temperatures exists due to data scarcity and the absence of robust methodologies, which often focus on large, major river basins. To address this, we leveraged the newly released, extensive AKTEMP data set and advanced machine learning techniques to develop a Long Short‐Term Memory (LSTM) model. By incorporating ERA5‐Land reanalysis data and integrating physical understanding into data‐driven processes, our model advanced river water temperature predictions in ungauged, snow‐ and permafrost‐affected basins in Alaska. Our model outperformed existing approaches in high‐latitude regions, achieving a median Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.95 and root mean squared error of 1.0°C. The LSTM model learned air temperature, soil temperature, solar radiation, and thermal radiation—factors associated with energy balance—were the most important drivers of river temperature dynamics. Soil moisture and snow water equivalent were highlighted as critical factors representing key processes such as thawing, melting, and groundwater contributions. Glaciers and permafrost were also identified as important covariates, particularly in seasonal river water temperature predictions. Our LSTM model successfully captured the complex relationships between hydrometeorological factors and river water temperatures across varying timescales and hydrological conditions. This scalable and transferable approach can be potentially applied across the Arctic, offering valuable insights for future conservation and management efforts.
format Article
id doaj-art-c69d91146fdf4f2b9c02433e30008df5
institution Kabale University
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Water Resources Research
spelling doaj-art-c69d91146fdf4f2b9c02433e30008df52025-08-20T03:29:48ZengWileyWater Resources Research0043-13971944-79732025-06-01616n/an/a10.1029/2024WR039053Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature PredictionsShuyu Y. Chang0Jon Schwenk1Kurt C. Solander2Department of Geography Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USALos Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM USALos Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM USAAbstract The accelerated warming in the Arctic poses serious risks to freshwater ecosystems by altering streamflow and river thermal regimes. However, limited research on Arctic River water temperatures exists due to data scarcity and the absence of robust methodologies, which often focus on large, major river basins. To address this, we leveraged the newly released, extensive AKTEMP data set and advanced machine learning techniques to develop a Long Short‐Term Memory (LSTM) model. By incorporating ERA5‐Land reanalysis data and integrating physical understanding into data‐driven processes, our model advanced river water temperature predictions in ungauged, snow‐ and permafrost‐affected basins in Alaska. Our model outperformed existing approaches in high‐latitude regions, achieving a median Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.95 and root mean squared error of 1.0°C. The LSTM model learned air temperature, soil temperature, solar radiation, and thermal radiation—factors associated with energy balance—were the most important drivers of river temperature dynamics. Soil moisture and snow water equivalent were highlighted as critical factors representing key processes such as thawing, melting, and groundwater contributions. Glaciers and permafrost were also identified as important covariates, particularly in seasonal river water temperature predictions. Our LSTM model successfully captured the complex relationships between hydrometeorological factors and river water temperatures across varying timescales and hydrological conditions. This scalable and transferable approach can be potentially applied across the Arctic, offering valuable insights for future conservation and management efforts.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039053river temperaturearcticmachine learningLSTMpermafrostsoil temperature
spellingShingle Shuyu Y. Chang
Jon Schwenk
Kurt C. Solander
Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature Predictions
Water Resources Research
river temperature
arctic
machine learning
LSTM
permafrost
soil temperature
title Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature Predictions
title_full Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature Predictions
title_fullStr Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature Predictions
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature Predictions
title_short Deep Learning Advances Arctic River Water Temperature Predictions
title_sort deep learning advances arctic river water temperature predictions
topic river temperature
arctic
machine learning
LSTM
permafrost
soil temperature
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039053
work_keys_str_mv AT shuyuychang deeplearningadvancesarcticriverwatertemperaturepredictions
AT jonschwenk deeplearningadvancesarcticriverwatertemperaturepredictions
AT kurtcsolander deeplearningadvancesarcticriverwatertemperaturepredictions