Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identities

This corpus-based study compares how Chinese and American banks construct corporate identities through genre-specific metaphors, metaphor scenarios, and stances in the genre of letter to shareholders. More specifically, it attempts: 1) to examine how Chinese and American banking companies construct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinxiao Wang, Yilin Xu, Chunyu Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 2024-12-01
Series:Ibérica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/786
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849220107678515200
author Jinxiao Wang
Yilin Xu
Chunyu Hu
author_facet Jinxiao Wang
Yilin Xu
Chunyu Hu
author_sort Jinxiao Wang
collection DOAJ
description This corpus-based study compares how Chinese and American banks construct corporate identities through genre-specific metaphors, metaphor scenarios, and stances in the genre of letter to shareholders. More specifically, it attempts: 1) to examine how Chinese and American banking companies construct their major foci using genre-specific metaphors; 2) to explore metaphor scenarios included in these genre-specific metaphors; 3) to elicit what types of identities are constructed through these scenarios and their stances. Six source domains were identified as genre-specific, under which metaphor scenarios of moving forward, support, and target & goal are shared by both corpora. Additionally, seeding, hurt & pain, and outcome of game are more frequent in American letters, whereas mechanism and soil appear more often in Chinese letters. These scenarios help to convey different stances taken by the banks, among which negative stances are more frequently presented in American letters. Despite of the shared identities of goal-oriented travelers by both corpora, Chinese banks tend to project themselves as loyal followers of country policies, authoritative leaders among peer companies, and flexible controllers of corporate issues who value the joint efforts from shareholders. In contrast, American banks prefer to project identities of skeptics of country policies, winners among peer competitions, and proactive stewards of shareholders and customers. The similarities can be explicated through embodied philosophy, and the variations are further examined through national culture of power distance, Chinese traditional Confucianism, and corporate culture of these banks.
format Article
id doaj-art-c641d32905ec4d1081404a52aa27e312
institution Kabale University
issn 1139-7241
2340-2784
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos
record_format Article
series Ibérica
spelling doaj-art-c641d32905ec4d1081404a52aa27e3122024-12-19T23:18:22ZengAsociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines EspecíficosIbérica1139-72412340-27842024-12-014810.17398/2340-2784.48.295Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identitiesJinxiao Wang0Yilin Xu1Chunyu Hu2Guangdong University of Foreign StudiesGuangdong University of Foreign StudiesGuangdong University of Foreign StudiesThis corpus-based study compares how Chinese and American banks construct corporate identities through genre-specific metaphors, metaphor scenarios, and stances in the genre of letter to shareholders. More specifically, it attempts: 1) to examine how Chinese and American banking companies construct their major foci using genre-specific metaphors; 2) to explore metaphor scenarios included in these genre-specific metaphors; 3) to elicit what types of identities are constructed through these scenarios and their stances. Six source domains were identified as genre-specific, under which metaphor scenarios of moving forward, support, and target & goal are shared by both corpora. Additionally, seeding, hurt & pain, and outcome of game are more frequent in American letters, whereas mechanism and soil appear more often in Chinese letters. These scenarios help to convey different stances taken by the banks, among which negative stances are more frequently presented in American letters. Despite of the shared identities of goal-oriented travelers by both corpora, Chinese banks tend to project themselves as loyal followers of country policies, authoritative leaders among peer companies, and flexible controllers of corporate issues who value the joint efforts from shareholders. In contrast, American banks prefer to project identities of skeptics of country policies, winners among peer competitions, and proactive stewards of shareholders and customers. The similarities can be explicated through embodied philosophy, and the variations are further examined through national culture of power distance, Chinese traditional Confucianism, and corporate culture of these banks. https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/786Conceptual metaphors, Metaphor scenarios, Stances, Corporate identities, Letters to shareholders
spellingShingle Jinxiao Wang
Yilin Xu
Chunyu Hu
Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identities
Ibérica
Conceptual metaphors, Metaphor scenarios, Stances, Corporate identities, Letters to shareholders
title Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identities
title_full Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identities
title_fullStr Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identities
title_full_unstemmed Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identities
title_short Metaphor scenarios, stances, and corporate identities
title_sort metaphor scenarios stances and corporate identities
topic Conceptual metaphors, Metaphor scenarios, Stances, Corporate identities, Letters to shareholders
url https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/786
work_keys_str_mv AT jinxiaowang metaphorscenariosstancesandcorporateidentities
AT yilinxu metaphorscenariosstancesandcorporateidentities
AT chunyuhu metaphorscenariosstancesandcorporateidentities