JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİ

Consciousness, which is discussed more and more as a result of Edmund Husserl's phenomenological studies in particular, is seen to be making contemporary intellectuals busy. Consciousness expressed by the concepts of cognition, sense, perception, etc. ca- , use disputes among both idealist a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Talip Karakaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Türk Felsefe Derneği 2004-07-01
Series:Felsefe Dünyası
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1870259
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570987922587648
author Talip Karakaya
author_facet Talip Karakaya
author_sort Talip Karakaya
collection DOAJ
description Consciousness, which is discussed more and more as a result of Edmund Husserl's phenomenological studies in particular, is seen to be making contemporary intellectuals busy. Consciousness expressed by the concepts of cognition, sense, perception, etc. ca- , use disputes among both idealist and materialist thinkers. It also occupies an important place in Jean-Paul Sartre's ontology. Is consciousness, which is considered by representatives of all extreme poles of philosophy, a phenomenon particular to human beings only? If so, does it contain only subject or object? What is its origin or core? Why does Sartre give an importance place to this in his philosophy? This work aims to provide an analysis and answers to these questions.. Parallel to this, in most of materialists, consciousness is a reflection of the matter and social origin developed to the highest level in animate beings, whereas in Husserl it is the consciousness of something. In Sartre, this concept has a rather different meaning. For him, no ego can create consciousness, and it belongs to being and is born with it. Consciousness, which is a result of the struggle for existence, tries to be full of itself and be fundamental to its existence. So, it has to befor-itself-in-itself, for it inquires into what is expected from itself, realises its full being and gets rid of the state of being nonsense. In short, according to Sartre, the characteristic of being-for-itself is not limited to consciousness. In this work, I tried to consider how being-for-itself struggles for its being, the connection of being-for-itself with non-existence, its the struggle to be free. I also deal with the probabilities it has and its place in the concept of time from Sartre's ontological and existentialist viewpoint.
format Article
id doaj-art-c60e330a6e5a41f9b3f7211e4972529a
institution Kabale University
issn 1301-0875
language English
publishDate 2004-07-01
publisher Türk Felsefe Derneği
record_format Article
series Felsefe Dünyası
spelling doaj-art-c60e330a6e5a41f9b3f7211e4972529a2025-02-02T13:23:46ZengTürk Felsefe DerneğiFelsefe Dünyası1301-08752004-07-01391541692040JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİTalip Karakaya0S.D.Ü.İlahiyat FakültesiConsciousness, which is discussed more and more as a result of Edmund Husserl's phenomenological studies in particular, is seen to be making contemporary intellectuals busy. Consciousness expressed by the concepts of cognition, sense, perception, etc. ca- , use disputes among both idealist and materialist thinkers. It also occupies an important place in Jean-Paul Sartre's ontology. Is consciousness, which is considered by representatives of all extreme poles of philosophy, a phenomenon particular to human beings only? If so, does it contain only subject or object? What is its origin or core? Why does Sartre give an importance place to this in his philosophy? This work aims to provide an analysis and answers to these questions.. Parallel to this, in most of materialists, consciousness is a reflection of the matter and social origin developed to the highest level in animate beings, whereas in Husserl it is the consciousness of something. In Sartre, this concept has a rather different meaning. For him, no ego can create consciousness, and it belongs to being and is born with it. Consciousness, which is a result of the struggle for existence, tries to be full of itself and be fundamental to its existence. So, it has to befor-itself-in-itself, for it inquires into what is expected from itself, realises its full being and gets rid of the state of being nonsense. In short, according to Sartre, the characteristic of being-for-itself is not limited to consciousness. In this work, I tried to consider how being-for-itself struggles for its being, the connection of being-for-itself with non-existence, its the struggle to be free. I also deal with the probabilities it has and its place in the concept of time from Sartre's ontological and existentialist viewpoint.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1870259consciousnessbeing for itselfsartreontologyphenomenologyhusserlcogitosubjectobjectnothingnessfreedomother.
spellingShingle Talip Karakaya
JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİ
Felsefe Dünyası
consciousness
being for itself
sartre
ontology
phenomenology
husserl
cogito
subject
object
nothingness
freedom
other.
title JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİ
title_full JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİ
title_fullStr JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİ
title_full_unstemmed JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİ
title_short JEAN-PAUL SARTRE FELSEFESİNDE KENDİSt-İÇÎN-VARLIfCJN ONTOLOJÎK ANALİZİ
title_sort jean paul sartre felsefesinde kendist icin varlifcjn ontolojik analizi
topic consciousness
being for itself
sartre
ontology
phenomenology
husserl
cogito
subject
object
nothingness
freedom
other.
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1870259
work_keys_str_mv AT talipkarakaya jeanpaulsartrefelsefesindekendisticinvarlifcjnontolojikanalizi