Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand
Introduction: Elections are a vital democratic mechanism in channeling people's voices, electing leaders, and determining policies, with the principles of transparency, fairness, and effective oversight. Although there are still challenges in citizen participation, elections play a crucial role...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Pattimura, Fakultas Hukum
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | SASI |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2977 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849470664490090496 |
|---|---|
| author | Kukuh Sudarmanto Edi Pranoto Vaibhav Jain |
| author_facet | Kukuh Sudarmanto Edi Pranoto Vaibhav Jain |
| author_sort | Kukuh Sudarmanto |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: Elections are a vital democratic mechanism in channeling people's voices, electing leaders, and determining policies, with the principles of transparency, fairness, and effective oversight. Although there are still challenges in citizen participation, elections play a crucial role in peaceful transitions of power and socio-political stability.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze efforts to reform electoral law from a responsive justice perspective by comparing laws between Indonesia, India, and Thailand.
Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research with a conceptual, legislative, and comparative approach.
Results of the Research: Election law reform, which includes the implementation of the principles of direct, free, and fair, is needed to create a more democratic system that is responsive to social needs. In Indonesia, India, and Thailand, election law reform focuses on improving the quality of democracy, justice, and voter participation through system changes and revisions to laws. The role of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court in each country is very important in ensuring more transparent and fair elections, and reflecting the will of the people. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c5f9cb20eb7442ff92672306f52182b5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1693-0061 2614-2961 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Pattimura, Fakultas Hukum |
| record_format | Article |
| series | SASI |
| spelling | doaj-art-c5f9cb20eb7442ff92672306f52182b52025-08-20T03:25:05ZengUniversitas Pattimura, Fakultas HukumSASI1693-00612614-29612025-07-0131217218710.47268/sasi.v31i2.29771278Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and ThailandKukuh Sudarmanto0Edi Pranoto1Vaibhav Jain2Faculty of Law, Universitas Semarang, SemarangFaculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, SemarangRenaissance Law College, Indore District, Madhya PradeshIntroduction: Elections are a vital democratic mechanism in channeling people's voices, electing leaders, and determining policies, with the principles of transparency, fairness, and effective oversight. Although there are still challenges in citizen participation, elections play a crucial role in peaceful transitions of power and socio-political stability. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze efforts to reform electoral law from a responsive justice perspective by comparing laws between Indonesia, India, and Thailand. Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research with a conceptual, legislative, and comparative approach. Results of the Research: Election law reform, which includes the implementation of the principles of direct, free, and fair, is needed to create a more democratic system that is responsive to social needs. In Indonesia, India, and Thailand, election law reform focuses on improving the quality of democracy, justice, and voter participation through system changes and revisions to laws. The role of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court in each country is very important in ensuring more transparent and fair elections, and reflecting the will of the people.https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2977responsive justiceelectionlegal comparison. |
| spellingShingle | Kukuh Sudarmanto Edi Pranoto Vaibhav Jain Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand SASI responsive justice election legal comparison. |
| title | Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand |
| title_full | Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand |
| title_fullStr | Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand |
| title_full_unstemmed | Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand |
| title_short | Electoral Law Reform in the Perspective of Responsive Justice: Comparative Law Between Indonesia, India, and Thailand |
| title_sort | electoral law reform in the perspective of responsive justice comparative law between indonesia india and thailand |
| topic | responsive justice election legal comparison. |
| url | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2977 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kukuhsudarmanto electorallawreformintheperspectiveofresponsivejusticecomparativelawbetweenindonesiaindiaandthailand AT edipranoto electorallawreformintheperspectiveofresponsivejusticecomparativelawbetweenindonesiaindiaandthailand AT vaibhavjain electorallawreformintheperspectiveofresponsivejusticecomparativelawbetweenindonesiaindiaandthailand |