Knowing What Things Are: A Response to My Critics

Abstract In this response to my commentators, I address several challenges to the erotetic account of knowing what things are, developed in Knowing What Things Are: An Inquiry-Based Approach. I clarify how my view handles complex webs of inquiry, contextual variation in answers, and normative dimens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ANDRÉ J. ABATH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2025-06-01
Series:Manuscrito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452025000200406&lng=en&tlng=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850215269171986432
author ANDRÉ J. ABATH
author_facet ANDRÉ J. ABATH
author_sort ANDRÉ J. ABATH
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this response to my commentators, I address several challenges to the erotetic account of knowing what things are, developed in Knowing What Things Are: An Inquiry-Based Approach. I clarify how my view handles complex webs of inquiry, contextual variation in answers, and normative dimensions of questions involving social kinds. Drawing on cases such as “What is a gene?” and “What is marriage?”, I explore how different epistemic and practical goals shape what counts as a good answer to “What is x?” questions. I also respond to worries about over- and under-generation of knowledge attributions, and the possibility of non-propositional knowledge. Finally, I consider the implications of my contextualism for truth, content, and fictional discourse, and suggest refinements to the original framework to better accommodate issues raised by my critics.
format Article
id doaj-art-c5eb03e927b4403fb0c04f942fb5afb2
institution OA Journals
issn 2317-630X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Manuscrito
spelling doaj-art-c5eb03e927b4403fb0c04f942fb5afb22025-08-20T02:08:40ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X2025-06-0148210.1590/0100-6045.2025.v48n2.ajKnowing What Things Are: A Response to My CriticsANDRÉ J. ABATHhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4747-5938Abstract In this response to my commentators, I address several challenges to the erotetic account of knowing what things are, developed in Knowing What Things Are: An Inquiry-Based Approach. I clarify how my view handles complex webs of inquiry, contextual variation in answers, and normative dimensions of questions involving social kinds. Drawing on cases such as “What is a gene?” and “What is marriage?”, I explore how different epistemic and practical goals shape what counts as a good answer to “What is x?” questions. I also respond to worries about over- and under-generation of knowledge attributions, and the possibility of non-propositional knowledge. Finally, I consider the implications of my contextualism for truth, content, and fictional discourse, and suggest refinements to the original framework to better accommodate issues raised by my critics.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452025000200406&lng=en&tlng=enknowledge-WhErotetic AccountContextualismSocial KindsNormative InquiryPropositional Knowledge
spellingShingle ANDRÉ J. ABATH
Knowing What Things Are: A Response to My Critics
Manuscrito
knowledge-Wh
Erotetic Account
Contextualism
Social Kinds
Normative Inquiry
Propositional Knowledge
title Knowing What Things Are: A Response to My Critics
title_full Knowing What Things Are: A Response to My Critics
title_fullStr Knowing What Things Are: A Response to My Critics
title_full_unstemmed Knowing What Things Are: A Response to My Critics
title_short Knowing What Things Are: A Response to My Critics
title_sort knowing what things are a response to my critics
topic knowledge-Wh
Erotetic Account
Contextualism
Social Kinds
Normative Inquiry
Propositional Knowledge
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452025000200406&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT andrejabath knowingwhatthingsarearesponsetomycritics