Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?

Abstract Background Telemedicine is a valuable tool to improve access to specialty care in emergency departments (EDs), and states have passed telemedicine parity laws requiring insurers to reimburse for telemedicine visits. Our objective was to determine if there is an association between such laws...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kori S. Zachrison, Krislyn M. Boggs, Rebecca E. Cash, Kyle R. Burton, Janice A. Espinola, Emily M. Hayden, Joseph P. Sauser, Ateev Mehrotra, Carlos A. Camargo Jr.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12359
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850196143902818304
author Kori S. Zachrison
Krislyn M. Boggs
Rebecca E. Cash
Kyle R. Burton
Janice A. Espinola
Emily M. Hayden
Joseph P. Sauser
Ateev Mehrotra
Carlos A. Camargo Jr.
author_facet Kori S. Zachrison
Krislyn M. Boggs
Rebecca E. Cash
Kyle R. Burton
Janice A. Espinola
Emily M. Hayden
Joseph P. Sauser
Ateev Mehrotra
Carlos A. Camargo Jr.
author_sort Kori S. Zachrison
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Telemedicine is a valuable tool to improve access to specialty care in emergency departments (EDs), and states have passed telemedicine parity laws requiring insurers to reimburse for telemedicine visits. Our objective was to determine if there is an association between such laws and the use of telemedicine in an ED. Methods As part of the 2016 and 2017 National ED Inventory–USA surveys, directors of all 5404 EDs in the United States were surveyed on the use of telemedicine. States were divided into those with any form of telemedicine parity law and those without (as of January 2016). We investigated the association between a telemedicine parity law and the use of telemedicine controlling for ED characteristics; state was included as a random intercept. Results In 2016, among the 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC), 21 (41%) had a telemedicine parity law, whereas 30 (59%) did not. Among the 4418 ED respondents to the telemedicine question (82% response rate), 2352 (53%) received telemedicine. The proportion of EDs receiving telemedicine varied widely across the states and DC, ranging from 13% in DC to 89% in Maine. Neither the presence nor duration of state telemedicine parity laws were independently associated with ED receipt of telemedicine in 2016 nor the adoption of telemedicine from 2016 to 2017. Conclusion Telemedicine parity laws were not associated with use of telemedicine in the ED. These results suggest that other factors are driving the wide variation in ED use of telemedicine across states.
format Article
id doaj-art-c5bcbf94b13e441a874d5a33a11d3a27
institution OA Journals
issn 2688-1152
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
spelling doaj-art-c5bcbf94b13e441a874d5a33a11d3a272025-08-20T02:13:32ZengElsevierJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522021-02-0121n/an/a10.1002/emp2.12359Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?Kori S. Zachrison0Krislyn M. Boggs1Rebecca E. Cash2Kyle R. Burton3Janice A. Espinola4Emily M. Hayden5Joseph P. Sauser6Ateev Mehrotra7Carlos A. Camargo Jr.8Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USAJohns Hopkins Emergency Medicine Residency Baltimore Maryland USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USAHankamer School of Business Baylor University Waco Texas USAHarvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USAAbstract Background Telemedicine is a valuable tool to improve access to specialty care in emergency departments (EDs), and states have passed telemedicine parity laws requiring insurers to reimburse for telemedicine visits. Our objective was to determine if there is an association between such laws and the use of telemedicine in an ED. Methods As part of the 2016 and 2017 National ED Inventory–USA surveys, directors of all 5404 EDs in the United States were surveyed on the use of telemedicine. States were divided into those with any form of telemedicine parity law and those without (as of January 2016). We investigated the association between a telemedicine parity law and the use of telemedicine controlling for ED characteristics; state was included as a random intercept. Results In 2016, among the 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC), 21 (41%) had a telemedicine parity law, whereas 30 (59%) did not. Among the 4418 ED respondents to the telemedicine question (82% response rate), 2352 (53%) received telemedicine. The proportion of EDs receiving telemedicine varied widely across the states and DC, ranging from 13% in DC to 89% in Maine. Neither the presence nor duration of state telemedicine parity laws were independently associated with ED receipt of telemedicine in 2016 nor the adoption of telemedicine from 2016 to 2017. Conclusion Telemedicine parity laws were not associated with use of telemedicine in the ED. These results suggest that other factors are driving the wide variation in ED use of telemedicine across states.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12359emergency departmenthealthcare policypayment policyreimbursementtelehealthtelemedicine
spellingShingle Kori S. Zachrison
Krislyn M. Boggs
Rebecca E. Cash
Kyle R. Burton
Janice A. Espinola
Emily M. Hayden
Joseph P. Sauser
Ateev Mehrotra
Carlos A. Camargo Jr.
Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
emergency department
healthcare policy
payment policy
reimbursement
telehealth
telemedicine
title Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?
title_full Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?
title_fullStr Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?
title_full_unstemmed Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?
title_short Are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department?
title_sort are state telemedicine parity laws associated with greater use of telemedicine in the emergency department
topic emergency department
healthcare policy
payment policy
reimbursement
telehealth
telemedicine
url https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12359
work_keys_str_mv AT koriszachrison arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT krislynmboggs arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT rebeccaecash arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT kylerburton arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT janiceaespinola arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT emilymhayden arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT josephpsauser arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT ateevmehrotra arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment
AT carlosacamargojr arestatetelemedicineparitylawsassociatedwithgreateruseoftelemedicineintheemergencydepartment