Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key

ABSTRACT Community‐based natural resource management is a common strategy for conserving biodiversity, but little is known about how such initiatives can scale appropriately and widely. We interviewed 80 experts across 5 widely adopted community‐based initiatives (in Chile, Nepal, Namibia, Madagasca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morena Mills, Marie V. Touchon, Elisa Denis, Sarah Milligan, Yasmeen Zuffetti, Zara Ahmad, Zoya Husain, Sushma Shrestha Sangat, Stefan Gelcich, Selma Lendelvo, Bharati Pathak, Alifereti Tawake, Michael B. Mascia, Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra, Thomas Pienkowski, Matthew Clark, Arundhati Jagadish
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Conservation Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13100
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850164188049047552
author Morena Mills
Marie V. Touchon
Elisa Denis
Sarah Milligan
Yasmeen Zuffetti
Zara Ahmad
Zoya Husain
Sushma Shrestha Sangat
Stefan Gelcich
Selma Lendelvo
Bharati Pathak
Alifereti Tawake
Michael B. Mascia
Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra
Thomas Pienkowski
Matthew Clark
Arundhati Jagadish
author_facet Morena Mills
Marie V. Touchon
Elisa Denis
Sarah Milligan
Yasmeen Zuffetti
Zara Ahmad
Zoya Husain
Sushma Shrestha Sangat
Stefan Gelcich
Selma Lendelvo
Bharati Pathak
Alifereti Tawake
Michael B. Mascia
Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra
Thomas Pienkowski
Matthew Clark
Arundhati Jagadish
author_sort Morena Mills
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Community‐based natural resource management is a common strategy for conserving biodiversity, but little is known about how such initiatives can scale appropriately and widely. We interviewed 80 experts across 5 widely adopted community‐based initiatives (in Chile, Nepal, Namibia, Madagascar, and Fiji) to understand their perspectives on the drivers of adoption and spread. We used general elimination methodology and diffusion of innovation theory to identify and rule out possible explanations. Factors consistently considered influential were economic and social benefits, compatibility with needs, support and facilitation by extension agencies, and the presence of international organizations. Initiatives aiming to scale should be designed to be flexible and aligned with adopters’ needs, and external organizations should coordinate resources for scaling out. Dependence on external support underscores the need for quality assistance, good practices by external actors, and understanding power relations and fairness, as well as the need to temper donor and policy expectations of scaling beyond supported and appropriate sites.
format Article
id doaj-art-c5a2c1bd1783447683c32cb8cf2aed96
institution OA Journals
issn 1755-263X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Conservation Letters
spelling doaj-art-c5a2c1bd1783447683c32cb8cf2aed962025-08-20T02:22:02ZengWileyConservation Letters1755-263X2025-05-01183n/an/a10.1111/conl.13100Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as KeyMorena Mills0Marie V. Touchon1Elisa Denis2Sarah Milligan3Yasmeen Zuffetti4Zara Ahmad5Zoya Husain6Sushma Shrestha Sangat7Stefan Gelcich8Selma Lendelvo9Bharati Pathak10Alifereti Tawake11Michael B. Mascia12Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra13Thomas Pienkowski14Matthew Clark15Arundhati Jagadish16Centre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKCentre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKCentre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKDepartment of Life SciencesImperial College LondonLondonUKCentre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKCentre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKCentre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKConservation InternationalGlobal Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities CenterArlington Virginia USACenter of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES)Facultad de Ciencias BiológicasPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChileLife Sciences Division, Multidisciplinary Research CentreUniversity of NamibiaWindhoekNamibiaFederation of Community Forestry UsersNepal (FECOFUN)KathmanduNepalLocally Managed Marine Area Network International TrustSuvaFijiSanford School of Public PolicyDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSAMIHARI, Villa Tsiriry, Lot VC 2 B, Ambanidia FaliarivoAntananarivo AnalamangaMadagascarCentre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKCentre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUKNature Conservation Foundation, Mysore, India, Moore Center for ScienceConservation InternationalArlingtonVirginiaUSAABSTRACT Community‐based natural resource management is a common strategy for conserving biodiversity, but little is known about how such initiatives can scale appropriately and widely. We interviewed 80 experts across 5 widely adopted community‐based initiatives (in Chile, Nepal, Namibia, Madagascar, and Fiji) to understand their perspectives on the drivers of adoption and spread. We used general elimination methodology and diffusion of innovation theory to identify and rule out possible explanations. Factors consistently considered influential were economic and social benefits, compatibility with needs, support and facilitation by extension agencies, and the presence of international organizations. Initiatives aiming to scale should be designed to be flexible and aligned with adopters’ needs, and external organizations should coordinate resources for scaling out. Dependence on external support underscores the need for quality assistance, good practices by external actors, and understanding power relations and fairness, as well as the need to temper donor and policy expectations of scaling beyond supported and appropriate sites.https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13100adoptioncommunity‐based conservationconservation decision‐makingcommunity‐based natural resource management (CBNRM)conservation policydiffusion of innovation theory
spellingShingle Morena Mills
Marie V. Touchon
Elisa Denis
Sarah Milligan
Yasmeen Zuffetti
Zara Ahmad
Zoya Husain
Sushma Shrestha Sangat
Stefan Gelcich
Selma Lendelvo
Bharati Pathak
Alifereti Tawake
Michael B. Mascia
Solofo Nandrianina Ralaimihoatra
Thomas Pienkowski
Matthew Clark
Arundhati Jagadish
Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key
Conservation Letters
adoption
community‐based conservation
conservation decision‐making
community‐based natural resource management (CBNRM)
conservation policy
diffusion of innovation theory
title Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key
title_full Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key
title_fullStr Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key
title_full_unstemmed Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key
title_short Scaling Out Community Conservation Initiatives: Experts Identify Economic and Social Benefits, Compatibility With Needs, and External Support as Key
title_sort scaling out community conservation initiatives experts identify economic and social benefits compatibility with needs and external support as key
topic adoption
community‐based conservation
conservation decision‐making
community‐based natural resource management (CBNRM)
conservation policy
diffusion of innovation theory
url https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13100
work_keys_str_mv AT morenamills scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT marievtouchon scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT elisadenis scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT sarahmilligan scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT yasmeenzuffetti scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT zaraahmad scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT zoyahusain scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT sushmashresthasangat scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT stefangelcich scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT selmalendelvo scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT bharatipathak scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT aliferetitawake scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT michaelbmascia scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT solofonandrianinaralaimihoatra scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT thomaspienkowski scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT matthewclark scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey
AT arundhatijagadish scalingoutcommunityconservationinitiativesexpertsidentifyeconomicandsocialbenefitscompatibilitywithneedsandexternalsupportaskey