A Diachronic Analysis of the Citational Practice of Comparing: A Corpus-Based Study of an Interdisciplinary Research Articles

This study investigates citation practices in a specific rhetorical step within the interdisciplinary field of Communication, examining changes from its emerging stage (1980–1981) to its maturing stage (2020–2021). Using a corpus-based approach, the study analyzed citation patterns of research artic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhu Yumei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-04-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251334231
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates citation practices in a specific rhetorical step within the interdisciplinary field of Communication, examining changes from its emerging stage (1980–1981) to its maturing stage (2020–2021). Using a corpus-based approach, the study analyzed citation patterns of research articles (RAs) from four leading Communication research journals. The study reveals diachronic changes in citation practices in Communication research, with shifts in source distribution, citation forms, and comparing stances. These changes reflect the evolution of Communication from an emerging interdisciplinary field reliant on sources of other fields to a mature discipline with greater coherence and independence. The findings offer insights for English for academic purposes (EAP) pedagogy, particularly in teaching critical citation strategies to navigate interdisciplinary research. Finally, this study highlights the need to legitimize interdisciplinary research through institutional support.
ISSN:2158-2440