КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities

The Constitution of Ukraine stipulates that an individual, his/her life, and health are the highest state social values. The authors highlighted that the health care system is the basis of social policy, national security, public health, and economic development. The current reformation of medical a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanislav Kotenko, Iana Kobushko, Iryna Heiets, Oleksandr Rusanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academic Research and Publishing UG (i. G.) 2021-06-01
Series:Health Economics and Management Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://armgpublishing.sumdu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/hem_2_2021_31_42.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850185113397100544
author Stanislav Kotenko
Iana Kobushko
Iryna Heiets
Oleksandr Rusanov
author_facet Stanislav Kotenko
Iana Kobushko
Iryna Heiets
Oleksandr Rusanov
author_sort Stanislav Kotenko
collection DOAJ
description The Constitution of Ukraine stipulates that an individual, his/her life, and health are the highest state social values. The authors highlighted that the health care system is the basis of social policy, national security, public health, and economic development. The current reformation of medical and legal reforms in Ukraine are fully covered by health legislation. In the context of these laws, the government promotes the development of private, communal, and state healthcare facilities. The authors noted that private medicine is snowballing in Ukraine, but the competitiveness of private health care facilities is insufficient in state medical reform. The study emphasized the absence of appropriate tools and mechanisms to motivate staff in private healthcare facilities. Based on the findings, the authors proposed introducing a set of evaluation indicators combined into a single integrated system – key performance indicators (KPIs), which would be the basis for calculating the bonus payroll. In turn, this system of material incentives should encourage medical staff to work effectively, be active, and initiative. The mechanism for developing a set of KPIs should be approved at the administration of the private health care facility. At the same time, medical workers of all levels must participate in KPIs elaborating. The indicators of medical care quality could be further used to improve healthcare, differentiated work assessment of medical staff, and healthcare facility in general, in accreditation and certification of private health care facilities. In the study, the authors formed and analyzed groups of indicators for different categories of the medical staff of private medical institutions. The obtained results showed that different bonus rates are needed to motivate employees at various levels to create an additional incentive to build a medical career. Thus, it could be argued that private healthcare facilities should develop motivation policy and strategy, revise system and forms of remuneration, improve the mechanism of motivation and incentives, focus on increasing competitiveness indicators in private medicine.
format Article
id doaj-art-c54bdebbb83b4e9182913acabeb7d4ff
institution OA Journals
issn 2786-4626
2786-4634
language English
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Academic Research and Publishing UG (i. G.)
record_format Article
series Health Economics and Management Review
spelling doaj-art-c54bdebbb83b4e9182913acabeb7d4ff2025-08-20T02:16:49ZengAcademic Research and Publishing UG (i. G.)Health Economics and Management Review2786-46262786-46342021-06-0122314210.61093/hem.2021.2-04КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilitiesStanislav Kotenko0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-0163Iana Kobushko1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2057-2300Iryna Heiets2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-3790Oleksandr Rusanov3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-2748Sumy State University, UkrainePh.D., Sumy State University, UkrainePh.D., Associate Professor, RMIT University, AustraliaSumy State University, UkraineThe Constitution of Ukraine stipulates that an individual, his/her life, and health are the highest state social values. The authors highlighted that the health care system is the basis of social policy, national security, public health, and economic development. The current reformation of medical and legal reforms in Ukraine are fully covered by health legislation. In the context of these laws, the government promotes the development of private, communal, and state healthcare facilities. The authors noted that private medicine is snowballing in Ukraine, but the competitiveness of private health care facilities is insufficient in state medical reform. The study emphasized the absence of appropriate tools and mechanisms to motivate staff in private healthcare facilities. Based on the findings, the authors proposed introducing a set of evaluation indicators combined into a single integrated system – key performance indicators (KPIs), which would be the basis for calculating the bonus payroll. In turn, this system of material incentives should encourage medical staff to work effectively, be active, and initiative. The mechanism for developing a set of KPIs should be approved at the administration of the private health care facility. At the same time, medical workers of all levels must participate in KPIs elaborating. The indicators of medical care quality could be further used to improve healthcare, differentiated work assessment of medical staff, and healthcare facility in general, in accreditation and certification of private health care facilities. In the study, the authors formed and analyzed groups of indicators for different categories of the medical staff of private medical institutions. The obtained results showed that different bonus rates are needed to motivate employees at various levels to create an additional incentive to build a medical career. Thus, it could be argued that private healthcare facilities should develop motivation policy and strategy, revise system and forms of remuneration, improve the mechanism of motivation and incentives, focus on increasing competitiveness indicators in private medicine.https://armgpublishing.sumdu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/hem_2_2021_31_42.pdfkey performance indicators (kpis)competitivenessmedical staffwork motivationprivate medicine
spellingShingle Stanislav Kotenko
Iana Kobushko
Iryna Heiets
Oleksandr Rusanov
КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities
Health Economics and Management Review
key performance indicators (kpis)
competitiveness
medical staff
work motivation
private medicine
title КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities
title_full КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities
title_fullStr КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities
title_full_unstemmed КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities
title_short КРІ model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities
title_sort крі model impact on employee motivation and competitiveness of private healthcare facilities
topic key performance indicators (kpis)
competitiveness
medical staff
work motivation
private medicine
url https://armgpublishing.sumdu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/hem_2_2021_31_42.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stanislavkotenko krímodelimpactonemployeemotivationandcompetitivenessofprivatehealthcarefacilities
AT ianakobushko krímodelimpactonemployeemotivationandcompetitivenessofprivatehealthcarefacilities
AT irynaheiets krímodelimpactonemployeemotivationandcompetitivenessofprivatehealthcarefacilities
AT oleksandrrusanov krímodelimpactonemployeemotivationandcompetitivenessofprivatehealthcarefacilities