Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish Communities

ABSTRACT Human activities are increasingly affecting marine environments, with fish communities serving as critical indicators of ecosystem health. Effective management of marine fishes is imperative for maintaining the balance of marine ecosystems, necessitating comprehensive monitoring strategies....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ewan Burns, Vijini Mallawaarachchi, Thomas M. Clarke, Belinda Martin, Joseph D. DiBattista, Jamie Hicks, Danny Brock, Elizabeth A. Dinsdale, Charlie Huveneers, Michael P. Doane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-11-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70050
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582975877808128
author Ewan Burns
Vijini Mallawaarachchi
Thomas M. Clarke
Belinda Martin
Joseph D. DiBattista
Jamie Hicks
Danny Brock
Elizabeth A. Dinsdale
Charlie Huveneers
Michael P. Doane
author_facet Ewan Burns
Vijini Mallawaarachchi
Thomas M. Clarke
Belinda Martin
Joseph D. DiBattista
Jamie Hicks
Danny Brock
Elizabeth A. Dinsdale
Charlie Huveneers
Michael P. Doane
author_sort Ewan Burns
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Human activities are increasingly affecting marine environments, with fish communities serving as critical indicators of ecosystem health. Effective management of marine fishes is imperative for maintaining the balance of marine ecosystems, necessitating comprehensive monitoring strategies. We used baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVS) and environmental DNA (eDNA) survey methods to assess fish communities across four offshore islands and seamount groups in Australia's eastern Great Australian Bight (GAB). Employing a paired sampling design, we conducted 32 BRUVS deployments and collected 32 eDNA samples in tandem. We compared the taxonomic and functional diversity of fish detected by these two methods and explored fish assemblage within the eastern GAB. Our findings demonstrated that BRUVS and eDNA data were complementary to each other, with each approach detecting distinct segments of the fish community. Only 17 of the 102 species recorded were detected by both methods and combining these two datasets resulted in a 40% increase in species‐level detections compared to either method alone. BRUVS predominantly identified benthic and demersal fish, whereas eDNA predominately identified pelagic species, including species of conservation (e.g., white sharks) and commercial significance (e.g., southern bluefin tuna). Yet, both methods distinguished depth‐dependent communities within a single sampling site. These findings emphasize the value of integrating multiple approaches for enhanced fish species detection, offering valuable insights into future biodiversity monitoring and conservation efforts.
format Article
id doaj-art-c5415c058a124925978e8bf75fb77610
institution Kabale University
issn 2637-4943
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Environmental DNA
spelling doaj-art-c5415c058a124925978e8bf75fb776102025-01-29T05:11:50ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432024-11-0166n/an/a10.1002/edn3.70050Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish CommunitiesEwan Burns0Vijini Mallawaarachchi1Thomas M. Clarke2Belinda Martin3Joseph D. DiBattista4Jamie Hicks5Danny Brock6Elizabeth A. Dinsdale7Charlie Huveneers8Michael P. Doane9College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia AustraliaCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia AustraliaCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia AustraliaCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia AustraliaSchool of Environment and Science Griffith University Southport Queensland AustraliaDepartment for Environment and Water Adelaide South Australia AustraliaDepartment for Environment and Water Adelaide South Australia AustraliaCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia AustraliaCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia AustraliaCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Bedford Park South Australia AustraliaABSTRACT Human activities are increasingly affecting marine environments, with fish communities serving as critical indicators of ecosystem health. Effective management of marine fishes is imperative for maintaining the balance of marine ecosystems, necessitating comprehensive monitoring strategies. We used baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVS) and environmental DNA (eDNA) survey methods to assess fish communities across four offshore islands and seamount groups in Australia's eastern Great Australian Bight (GAB). Employing a paired sampling design, we conducted 32 BRUVS deployments and collected 32 eDNA samples in tandem. We compared the taxonomic and functional diversity of fish detected by these two methods and explored fish assemblage within the eastern GAB. Our findings demonstrated that BRUVS and eDNA data were complementary to each other, with each approach detecting distinct segments of the fish community. Only 17 of the 102 species recorded were detected by both methods and combining these two datasets resulted in a 40% increase in species‐level detections compared to either method alone. BRUVS predominantly identified benthic and demersal fish, whereas eDNA predominately identified pelagic species, including species of conservation (e.g., white sharks) and commercial significance (e.g., southern bluefin tuna). Yet, both methods distinguished depth‐dependent communities within a single sampling site. These findings emphasize the value of integrating multiple approaches for enhanced fish species detection, offering valuable insights into future biodiversity monitoring and conservation efforts.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70050BRUVSCarcharodon carchariaseDNAenvironmental DNAfish communitiesfish ecology
spellingShingle Ewan Burns
Vijini Mallawaarachchi
Thomas M. Clarke
Belinda Martin
Joseph D. DiBattista
Jamie Hicks
Danny Brock
Elizabeth A. Dinsdale
Charlie Huveneers
Michael P. Doane
Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish Communities
Environmental DNA
BRUVS
Carcharodon carcharias
eDNA
environmental DNA
fish communities
fish ecology
title Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish Communities
title_full Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish Communities
title_fullStr Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish Communities
title_full_unstemmed Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish Communities
title_short Complementary Non‐invasive Fish Monitoring Distinguishes Depth‐Dependent Fish Communities
title_sort complementary non invasive fish monitoring distinguishes depth dependent fish communities
topic BRUVS
Carcharodon carcharias
eDNA
environmental DNA
fish communities
fish ecology
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70050
work_keys_str_mv AT ewanburns complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT vijinimallawaarachchi complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT thomasmclarke complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT belindamartin complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT josephddibattista complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT jamiehicks complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT dannybrock complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT elizabethadinsdale complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT charliehuveneers complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities
AT michaelpdoane complementarynoninvasivefishmonitoringdistinguishesdepthdependentfishcommunities