Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
Purpose. To compare visual field results obtained using Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF) iPad-based perimeter software and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) standard program in glaucoma patients. Design. A cross-sectional observational study. Methods. In t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Harsh Kumar, Mithun Thulasidas |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8384509 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2
by: Takagi Y, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Multi-centre comparison between device-independent web-browser perimetry (Melbourne Rapid Fields-web) and SITA-Faster for glaucoma
by: Joyce Tiang, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Evaluation of additional points in the 24-2C visual field test in pre-perimetric glaucoma
by: Gökhan Çelik, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Comparison of peripapillary vessel density between preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma evaluated by OCT-angiography.
by: Si Bum Kim, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Correlations between Steady-State Pattern Electroretinogram and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer Global Indices and Their Associations with Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in Glaucoma Suspects
by: Andrew Tirsi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)