Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models
Systematic monitoring of water quality parameters in aquatic environments was a critical task for environmental protection and water resource management. Remote sensing technology, as an effective monitoring tool, provided real-time water quality data. Currently, most research primarily relied on re...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Series: | Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19942060.2025.2509658 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850238775186161664 |
|---|---|
| author | Yubo Zhao Mo Chen Jinyu He Yanping Ma |
| author_facet | Yubo Zhao Mo Chen Jinyu He Yanping Ma |
| author_sort | Yubo Zhao |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Systematic monitoring of water quality parameters in aquatic environments was a critical task for environmental protection and water resource management. Remote sensing technology, as an effective monitoring tool, provided real-time water quality data. Currently, most research primarily relied on reflectance analysis of remote sensing data, often overlooking the impact of environmental factors on aquatic environments. This study integrated field data, multispectral imagery, meteorological data, and hydrological data to invert the water quality conditions of aquatic environments. A machine learning model (CNN-RF) was developed to estimate three water quality parameters (TP, DO, COD), and its performance was comprehensively evaluated using four error indices (R², MAE, MSE, MAPE). The results indicated that, compared to models using only spectral reflectance as features, the inclusion of environmental factors significantly enhanced the accuracy of the inversion of the three water quality parameters. For the watershed, the R² values for TP, DO, and COD increased by 0.34, 0.43, and 0.42, respectively. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 1, and the MAEP was less than 15.65%. For the lake, the R² values for TP across four months were 0.75, 0.66, 0.67, and 0.73; for DO, they were 0.73, 0.79, 0.73, and 0.64; and for COD, they were 0.73, 0.62, 0.66, and 0.61, all exceeding 0.6. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 0.95, and the MAEP was less than 12.6%. Both the watershed and lake models met the inversion requirements. Additionally, the SHAP method was employed to quantitatively analyze the contribution of environmental factors and spectral bands to the model inversion. Therefore, the findings confirmed the importance of environmental variables in water quality inversion and provided a theoretical basis for the optimization and application of future water quality monitoring systems. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c50ae24d8b554f03a01c6c56a0436eb4 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1994-2060 1997-003X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics |
| spelling | doaj-art-c50ae24d8b554f03a01c6c56a0436eb42025-08-20T02:01:23ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEngineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics1994-20601997-003X2025-12-0119110.1080/19942060.2025.2509658Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning modelsYubo Zhao0Mo Chen1Jinyu He2Yanping Ma3College of Heilongjiang rive and lake chief, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Hydraulic and Electric-power, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, People’s Republic of ChinaCollege of Heilongjiang rive and lake chief, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, People’s Republic of ChinaCollege of Heilongjiang rive and lake chief, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, People’s Republic of ChinaSystematic monitoring of water quality parameters in aquatic environments was a critical task for environmental protection and water resource management. Remote sensing technology, as an effective monitoring tool, provided real-time water quality data. Currently, most research primarily relied on reflectance analysis of remote sensing data, often overlooking the impact of environmental factors on aquatic environments. This study integrated field data, multispectral imagery, meteorological data, and hydrological data to invert the water quality conditions of aquatic environments. A machine learning model (CNN-RF) was developed to estimate three water quality parameters (TP, DO, COD), and its performance was comprehensively evaluated using four error indices (R², MAE, MSE, MAPE). The results indicated that, compared to models using only spectral reflectance as features, the inclusion of environmental factors significantly enhanced the accuracy of the inversion of the three water quality parameters. For the watershed, the R² values for TP, DO, and COD increased by 0.34, 0.43, and 0.42, respectively. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 1, and the MAEP was less than 15.65%. For the lake, the R² values for TP across four months were 0.75, 0.66, 0.67, and 0.73; for DO, they were 0.73, 0.79, 0.73, and 0.64; and for COD, they were 0.73, 0.62, 0.66, and 0.61, all exceeding 0.6. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 0.95, and the MAEP was less than 12.6%. Both the watershed and lake models met the inversion requirements. Additionally, the SHAP method was employed to quantitatively analyze the contribution of environmental factors and spectral bands to the model inversion. Therefore, the findings confirmed the importance of environmental variables in water quality inversion and provided a theoretical basis for the optimization and application of future water quality monitoring systems.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19942060.2025.2509658Remote sensingenvironmental factorsmachine learningaquatic environmentwater quality monitoring |
| spellingShingle | Yubo Zhao Mo Chen Jinyu He Yanping Ma Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics Remote sensing environmental factors machine learning aquatic environment water quality monitoring |
| title | Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models |
| title_full | Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models |
| title_fullStr | Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models |
| title_short | Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models |
| title_sort | monitoring water quality parameters using multi source data driven machine learning models |
| topic | Remote sensing environmental factors machine learning aquatic environment water quality monitoring |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19942060.2025.2509658 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yubozhao monitoringwaterqualityparametersusingmultisourcedatadrivenmachinelearningmodels AT mochen monitoringwaterqualityparametersusingmultisourcedatadrivenmachinelearningmodels AT jinyuhe monitoringwaterqualityparametersusingmultisourcedatadrivenmachinelearningmodels AT yanpingma monitoringwaterqualityparametersusingmultisourcedatadrivenmachinelearningmodels |