Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 months

BACKGROUND: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a common condition in neonates, often requiring intervention when conservative treatments and simple probing fail. This study aimed to explore the efficiency and safety of endoscopic-guided bicanalicular (BC) and monocanalicular (MC) Ri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walid Mohamed Abdalla, Eman N. Sultan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-05-01
Series:Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ojo.ojo_250_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849424289678229504
author Walid Mohamed Abdalla
Eman N. Sultan
author_facet Walid Mohamed Abdalla
Eman N. Sultan
author_sort Walid Mohamed Abdalla
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a common condition in neonates, often requiring intervention when conservative treatments and simple probing fail. This study aimed to explore the efficiency and safety of endoscopic-guided bicanalicular (BC) and monocanalicular (MC) Ritleng intubation in treating CNLDO. METHODOLOGY: This multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized comparative study was conducted between 2007 and 2022. The study included a total of 90 patients aged 24–53 months who had either failed probing or presented late with CNLDO. The participants were divided into two groups: 45 treated with BC and the other 45 with MC Ritleng intubation. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1 week postoperatively, then at 1 month, and 3 months after stent removal. Finally, postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The clinical success rates were comparable, with BC achieving 93.3% and MC achieving 92.2% (P = 0.68). BC intubation was associated with a higher complication rate (28.9%) compared to MC (4.4%), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.004). The study also revealed the absence of significant associations between the incidence of complications and age, gender, or preexisting conditions (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Both BC and MC Ritleng intubation are effective treatments for late-presenting CNLDO and cases following failed probing. However, MC intubation stands out as a safer and quicker option, significantly reducing the risk of complications. This study emphasizes the advantages of MC Ritleng intubation for pediatric patients with CNLDO.
format Article
id doaj-art-c4f2d1be0c34430ea903f38f8154a728
institution Kabale University
issn 0974-620X
0974-7842
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-c4f2d1be0c34430ea903f38f8154a7282025-08-20T03:30:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsOman Journal of Ophthalmology0974-620X0974-78422025-05-0118219319710.4103/ojo.ojo_250_24Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 monthsWalid Mohamed AbdallaEman N. SultanBACKGROUND: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a common condition in neonates, often requiring intervention when conservative treatments and simple probing fail. This study aimed to explore the efficiency and safety of endoscopic-guided bicanalicular (BC) and monocanalicular (MC) Ritleng intubation in treating CNLDO. METHODOLOGY: This multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized comparative study was conducted between 2007 and 2022. The study included a total of 90 patients aged 24–53 months who had either failed probing or presented late with CNLDO. The participants were divided into two groups: 45 treated with BC and the other 45 with MC Ritleng intubation. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1 week postoperatively, then at 1 month, and 3 months after stent removal. Finally, postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The clinical success rates were comparable, with BC achieving 93.3% and MC achieving 92.2% (P = 0.68). BC intubation was associated with a higher complication rate (28.9%) compared to MC (4.4%), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.004). The study also revealed the absence of significant associations between the incidence of complications and age, gender, or preexisting conditions (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Both BC and MC Ritleng intubation are effective treatments for late-presenting CNLDO and cases following failed probing. However, MC intubation stands out as a safer and quicker option, significantly reducing the risk of complications. This study emphasizes the advantages of MC Ritleng intubation for pediatric patients with CNLDO.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ojo.ojo_250_24bicanalicularcongenital nasolacrimal duct obstructiondacryostenosisepiphoraeye dischargemonocanalicularritleng intubation
spellingShingle Walid Mohamed Abdalla
Eman N. Sultan
Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 months
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
bicanalicular
congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
dacryostenosis
epiphora
eye discharge
monocanalicular
ritleng intubation
title Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 months
title_full Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 months
title_fullStr Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 months
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 months
title_short Endoscopic-guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular Ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24–53 months
title_sort endoscopic guided monocanalicular versus bicanalicular ritleng intubation for treating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients aged 24 53 months
topic bicanalicular
congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
dacryostenosis
epiphora
eye discharge
monocanalicular
ritleng intubation
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ojo.ojo_250_24
work_keys_str_mv AT walidmohamedabdalla endoscopicguidedmonocanalicularversusbicanalicularritlengintubationfortreatingcongenitalnasolacrimalductobstructioninpatientsaged2453months
AT emannsultan endoscopicguidedmonocanalicularversusbicanalicularritlengintubationfortreatingcongenitalnasolacrimalductobstructioninpatientsaged2453months