Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐Making

ABSTRACT Purpose Genetic studies on the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community have started to appear in the literature. However, there are limited studies on how genetic data will impact attitudes and perspectives toward TGD individuals. In this study, we investigated the impact of genetic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duygu Onur Cura, Ayfer Ülgenalp, Tufan Çankaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70228
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582653128212480
author Duygu Onur Cura
Ayfer Ülgenalp
Tufan Çankaya
author_facet Duygu Onur Cura
Ayfer Ülgenalp
Tufan Çankaya
author_sort Duygu Onur Cura
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Purpose Genetic studies on the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community have started to appear in the literature. However, there are limited studies on how genetic data will impact attitudes and perspectives toward TGD individuals. In this study, we investigated the impact of genetic alterations on physicians' attitudes toward TGD individuals and on physicians' decisions concerning gender confirmation surgery (GCS). In this context, we intended to highlight a number of strategies to reduce the inequalities that the TGD community is exposed to in accessing health‐care services. Method An online survey including the Turkish version of the Attitudes Toward Transgendered Individuals Scale (ATTIS) was completed by 224 physicians from relevant specialties. Scheffé and least significant difference (LSD) post hoc analysis methods were used to determine physicians' perspectives on whether genetic findings would cause TGD individuals to feel validated/invalidated. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis was employed to assess their responses concerning the decision to perform GCS when genetic alterations had been identified. Results More than half of the physicians expressed the view that genetic analyses for TGD individuals would confer benefits (67.1%). Those who thought that the presence of gender–diversity‐related genetic alterations would have a “positive impact” on their GCS‐related decision to operate were found to have less positive attitudes toward TGD individuals (Bonferroni corrected p < 0.001). Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that age, presenting the odds ratio as the strongest factor, distinguished the “no impact” group from the reference “positive impact” group, particularly among those aged ≤ 35 years (3.299, 95% CI: 1.355–8.033; p = 0.009). Conclusion Although genetic analysis of TGD individuals is predicted to have a positive effect on physicians' attitudes toward them and on the GCS decision‐making process, it should be emphasized that the benefits for TGD individuals must outweigh the potential harm. The results showed that physicians need “early and continuing education” to develop a comprehensive perspective on gender identity. The most appropriate approach for genetic testing would be to include the TGD community in decision‐making processes and to develop guidelines for the interpretation of genetic data.
format Article
id doaj-art-c4e579366e9b41c490102f9388556681
institution Kabale University
issn 2162-3279
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj-art-c4e579366e9b41c490102f93885566812025-01-29T13:36:39ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792025-01-01151n/an/a10.1002/brb3.70228Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐MakingDuygu Onur Cura0Ayfer Ülgenalp1Tufan Çankaya2Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences Dokuz Eylül University Izmir TürkiyeDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences Dokuz Eylül University Izmir TürkiyeDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Dokuz Eylül University Izmir TürkiyeABSTRACT Purpose Genetic studies on the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community have started to appear in the literature. However, there are limited studies on how genetic data will impact attitudes and perspectives toward TGD individuals. In this study, we investigated the impact of genetic alterations on physicians' attitudes toward TGD individuals and on physicians' decisions concerning gender confirmation surgery (GCS). In this context, we intended to highlight a number of strategies to reduce the inequalities that the TGD community is exposed to in accessing health‐care services. Method An online survey including the Turkish version of the Attitudes Toward Transgendered Individuals Scale (ATTIS) was completed by 224 physicians from relevant specialties. Scheffé and least significant difference (LSD) post hoc analysis methods were used to determine physicians' perspectives on whether genetic findings would cause TGD individuals to feel validated/invalidated. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis was employed to assess their responses concerning the decision to perform GCS when genetic alterations had been identified. Results More than half of the physicians expressed the view that genetic analyses for TGD individuals would confer benefits (67.1%). Those who thought that the presence of gender–diversity‐related genetic alterations would have a “positive impact” on their GCS‐related decision to operate were found to have less positive attitudes toward TGD individuals (Bonferroni corrected p < 0.001). Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that age, presenting the odds ratio as the strongest factor, distinguished the “no impact” group from the reference “positive impact” group, particularly among those aged ≤ 35 years (3.299, 95% CI: 1.355–8.033; p = 0.009). Conclusion Although genetic analysis of TGD individuals is predicted to have a positive effect on physicians' attitudes toward them and on the GCS decision‐making process, it should be emphasized that the benefits for TGD individuals must outweigh the potential harm. The results showed that physicians need “early and continuing education” to develop a comprehensive perspective on gender identity. The most appropriate approach for genetic testing would be to include the TGD community in decision‐making processes and to develop guidelines for the interpretation of genetic data.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70228attitudes of physiciansgender confirmation surgerygenetic analysestransgender and gender diverse
spellingShingle Duygu Onur Cura
Ayfer Ülgenalp
Tufan Çankaya
Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐Making
Brain and Behavior
attitudes of physicians
gender confirmation surgery
genetic analyses
transgender and gender diverse
title Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐Making
title_full Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐Making
title_fullStr Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐Making
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐Making
title_short Genetic Analyses on Transgender Individuals: Impact on Physician Attitudes and Surgical Decision‐Making
title_sort genetic analyses on transgender individuals impact on physician attitudes and surgical decision making
topic attitudes of physicians
gender confirmation surgery
genetic analyses
transgender and gender diverse
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70228
work_keys_str_mv AT duyguonurcura geneticanalysesontransgenderindividualsimpactonphysicianattitudesandsurgicaldecisionmaking
AT ayferulgenalp geneticanalysesontransgenderindividualsimpactonphysicianattitudesandsurgicaldecisionmaking
AT tufancankaya geneticanalysesontransgenderindividualsimpactonphysicianattitudesandsurgicaldecisionmaking