Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Tailored Assessment and Clinical Implications

Non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) are increasingly emerging as important modifiers of cardiovascular risk (CVR), offering insights beyond traditional metrics like hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. These include novel biomarkers, chronic conditions (e.g., chronic kidney diseas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Perone, Marco Bernardi, Luigi Spadafora, Matteo Betti, Stefano Cacciatore, Francesco Saia, Federica Fogacci, Vikash Jaiswal, Elad Asher, Francesco Paneni, Salvatore De Rosa, Maciej Banach, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Pierre Sabouret
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/12/5/171
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) are increasingly emerging as important modifiers of cardiovascular risk (CVR), offering insights beyond traditional metrics like hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. These include novel biomarkers, chronic conditions (e.g., chronic kidney disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), environmental exposures, chronic inflammation, infections, psychosocial factors, and sex-specific conditions, all of which influence the prediction, management, and outcomes of cardiovascular disease (CVD). These additional RFs may impact on CVD prediction and add valid information during tailored patient assessment and management. Therefore, a careful assessment of both traditional and non-traditional cardiovascular RFs, with a personalized treatment, could dramatically reduce the total CVD burden. Nevertheless, further research is needed to precisely estimate the magnitude of their impact as risk and prognosis modifiers in order to be included in future risk charts. This review provides a critical analysis of non-traditional RFs, their pathophysiological mechanisms, and their implications for personalized care. Integrating these factors into CVR assessment can reclassify patient risk categories, optimize therapeutic strategies, and improve prognosis. However, further research is needed to refine their inclusion in risk charts and evaluate their impact on public health outcomes. A tailored, multidisciplinary approach is essential to reduce the burden of CVD and associated mortality.
ISSN:2308-3425