Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook Control

Hub motor-driven vehicles (HMDVs) suffer from poor handling and stability due to an increased unsprung mass and unbalanced radial electromagnetic forces. Although traditional ground-hook control reduces the dynamic tire load, it severely worsens the body acceleration. This paper presents a generaliz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yihong Ping, Xiaofeng Yang, Yi Yang, Yujie Shen, Shaocong Zeng, Shihang Dai, Jingchen Hong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Machines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/13/7/556
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849733453175586816
author Yihong Ping
Xiaofeng Yang
Yi Yang
Yujie Shen
Shaocong Zeng
Shihang Dai
Jingchen Hong
author_facet Yihong Ping
Xiaofeng Yang
Yi Yang
Yujie Shen
Shaocong Zeng
Shihang Dai
Jingchen Hong
author_sort Yihong Ping
collection DOAJ
description Hub motor-driven vehicles (HMDVs) suffer from poor handling and stability due to an increased unsprung mass and unbalanced radial electromagnetic forces. Although traditional ground-hook control reduces the dynamic tire load, it severely worsens the body acceleration. This paper presents a generalized ground-hook control strategy based on impedance transfer functions to address the parameter redundancy in structural methods. A quarter-vehicle model with a switched reluctance motor wheel hub drive was used to study different orders of generalized ground-hook impedance transfer function control strategies for dynamic inertial suspension. An enhanced fish swarm parameter optimization method identified the optimal solutions for different structural orders. Analyses showed that the third-order control strategy optimized the body acceleration by 2%, reduced the dynamic tire load by 8%, and decreased the suspension working space by 22%. This strategy also substantially lowered the power spectral density for the body acceleration and dynamic tire load in the low-frequency band of 1.2 Hz. Additionally, it balanced computational complexity and performance, having slightly higher complexity than lower-order methods but much less than higher-order structures, meeting real-time constraints. To address time-domain deviations from generalized ground-hook control in semi-active systems, a dynamic compensation strategy was proposed: eight topological structures were created by modifying the spring–damper structure. A deviation correction mechanism was devised based on the frequency-domain coupling characteristics between the wheel speed and suspension relative velocity. For ride comfort and road-friendliness, a dual-frequency control criterion was introduced: in the low-frequency range, energy transfer suppression and phase synchronization locking were realized by constraining the ground-hook damping coefficient or inertance coefficient, while in the high-frequency range, the inertia-dominant characteristic was enhanced, and dynamic phase adaptation was permitted to mitigate road excitations. The results show that only the T0 and T5 structures met dynamic constraints across the frequency spectrum. Time-domain simulations showed that the deviation between the T5 structure and the third-order generalized ground-hook impedance model was relatively small, outperforming traditional and T0 structures, validating the model’s superior adaptability in high-order semi-active suspension.
format Article
id doaj-art-c4ddfc7110ac4fedb4c71d1046ff592c
institution DOAJ
issn 2075-1702
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Machines
spelling doaj-art-c4ddfc7110ac4fedb4c71d1046ff592c2025-08-20T03:08:01ZengMDPI AGMachines2075-17022025-06-0113755610.3390/machines13070556Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook ControlYihong Ping0Xiaofeng Yang1Yi Yang2Yujie Shen3Shaocong Zeng4Shihang Dai5Jingchen Hong6School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaAutomotive Engineering Research Institute, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaHub motor-driven vehicles (HMDVs) suffer from poor handling and stability due to an increased unsprung mass and unbalanced radial electromagnetic forces. Although traditional ground-hook control reduces the dynamic tire load, it severely worsens the body acceleration. This paper presents a generalized ground-hook control strategy based on impedance transfer functions to address the parameter redundancy in structural methods. A quarter-vehicle model with a switched reluctance motor wheel hub drive was used to study different orders of generalized ground-hook impedance transfer function control strategies for dynamic inertial suspension. An enhanced fish swarm parameter optimization method identified the optimal solutions for different structural orders. Analyses showed that the third-order control strategy optimized the body acceleration by 2%, reduced the dynamic tire load by 8%, and decreased the suspension working space by 22%. This strategy also substantially lowered the power spectral density for the body acceleration and dynamic tire load in the low-frequency band of 1.2 Hz. Additionally, it balanced computational complexity and performance, having slightly higher complexity than lower-order methods but much less than higher-order structures, meeting real-time constraints. To address time-domain deviations from generalized ground-hook control in semi-active systems, a dynamic compensation strategy was proposed: eight topological structures were created by modifying the spring–damper structure. A deviation correction mechanism was devised based on the frequency-domain coupling characteristics between the wheel speed and suspension relative velocity. For ride comfort and road-friendliness, a dual-frequency control criterion was introduced: in the low-frequency range, energy transfer suppression and phase synchronization locking were realized by constraining the ground-hook damping coefficient or inertance coefficient, while in the high-frequency range, the inertia-dominant characteristic was enhanced, and dynamic phase adaptation was permitted to mitigate road excitations. The results show that only the T0 and T5 structures met dynamic constraints across the frequency spectrum. Time-domain simulations showed that the deviation between the T5 structure and the third-order generalized ground-hook impedance model was relatively small, outperforming traditional and T0 structures, validating the model’s superior adaptability in high-order semi-active suspension.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/13/7/556HMDVgeneralized ground-hook controlvehicle dynamic inertial suspensionhandling stabilityphase deviation
spellingShingle Yihong Ping
Xiaofeng Yang
Yi Yang
Yujie Shen
Shaocong Zeng
Shihang Dai
Jingchen Hong
Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook Control
Machines
HMDV
generalized ground-hook control
vehicle dynamic inertial suspension
handling stability
phase deviation
title Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook Control
title_full Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook Control
title_fullStr Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook Control
title_full_unstemmed Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook Control
title_short Phase–Frequency Cooperative Optimization of HMDV Dynamic Inertial Suspension System with Generalized Ground-Hook Control
title_sort phase frequency cooperative optimization of hmdv dynamic inertial suspension system with generalized ground hook control
topic HMDV
generalized ground-hook control
vehicle dynamic inertial suspension
handling stability
phase deviation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/13/7/556
work_keys_str_mv AT yihongping phasefrequencycooperativeoptimizationofhmdvdynamicinertialsuspensionsystemwithgeneralizedgroundhookcontrol
AT xiaofengyang phasefrequencycooperativeoptimizationofhmdvdynamicinertialsuspensionsystemwithgeneralizedgroundhookcontrol
AT yiyang phasefrequencycooperativeoptimizationofhmdvdynamicinertialsuspensionsystemwithgeneralizedgroundhookcontrol
AT yujieshen phasefrequencycooperativeoptimizationofhmdvdynamicinertialsuspensionsystemwithgeneralizedgroundhookcontrol
AT shaocongzeng phasefrequencycooperativeoptimizationofhmdvdynamicinertialsuspensionsystemwithgeneralizedgroundhookcontrol
AT shihangdai phasefrequencycooperativeoptimizationofhmdvdynamicinertialsuspensionsystemwithgeneralizedgroundhookcontrol
AT jingchenhong phasefrequencycooperativeoptimizationofhmdvdynamicinertialsuspensionsystemwithgeneralizedgroundhookcontrol