Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Objective</h4>Many studies have addressed the diagnostic performance of echocardiography to evaluate acute cardiac allograft rejection compared with endomyocardial biopsy. But the existence of heterogeneity limited its clinical application. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive, systema...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Lu, Jun Zheng, Xudong Pan, Lizhong Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121228
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849320773344296960
author Wei Lu
Jun Zheng
Xudong Pan
Lizhong Sun
author_facet Wei Lu
Jun Zheng
Xudong Pan
Lizhong Sun
author_sort Wei Lu
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>Many studies have addressed the diagnostic performance of echocardiography to evaluate acute cardiac allograft rejection compared with endomyocardial biopsy. But the existence of heterogeneity limited its clinical application. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive, systematic literature review and meta-analysis for the purpose.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies prior to September 1, 2014 identified by Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrance were examined by two independent reviews. We conducted meta-analysis by using Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. An assessment tool of QUADAS-2 was applied to evaluate the risk of bias and applicability of the studies.<h4>Results</h4>Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria of meta-analysis. The four parameters of pressure half time, isovolumic relaxation time, index of myocardial performance and late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity were included in the meta-analysis, with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 10.43, 6.89, 15.95 and 5.68 respectively, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves value of 0.829, 0.599, 0.871 and 0.685 respectively.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The meta-analysis and systematic review demonstrate that no single parameter of echocardiography showed a reliable diagnostic performance for acute cardiac allograft rejection. A result of echocardiography for ACAR should be comprehensively considered by physicians in the context of clinical presentations and imaging feature.
format Article
id doaj-art-c4cb9670ea5f4b808b81e5a40b248022
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-c4cb9670ea5f4b808b81e5a40b2480222025-08-20T03:49:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e012122810.1371/journal.pone.0121228Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wei LuJun ZhengXudong PanLizhong Sun<h4>Objective</h4>Many studies have addressed the diagnostic performance of echocardiography to evaluate acute cardiac allograft rejection compared with endomyocardial biopsy. But the existence of heterogeneity limited its clinical application. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive, systematic literature review and meta-analysis for the purpose.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies prior to September 1, 2014 identified by Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrance were examined by two independent reviews. We conducted meta-analysis by using Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. An assessment tool of QUADAS-2 was applied to evaluate the risk of bias and applicability of the studies.<h4>Results</h4>Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria of meta-analysis. The four parameters of pressure half time, isovolumic relaxation time, index of myocardial performance and late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity were included in the meta-analysis, with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 10.43, 6.89, 15.95 and 5.68 respectively, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves value of 0.829, 0.599, 0.871 and 0.685 respectively.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The meta-analysis and systematic review demonstrate that no single parameter of echocardiography showed a reliable diagnostic performance for acute cardiac allograft rejection. A result of echocardiography for ACAR should be comprehensively considered by physicians in the context of clinical presentations and imaging feature.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121228
spellingShingle Wei Lu
Jun Zheng
Xudong Pan
Lizhong Sun
Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121228
work_keys_str_mv AT weilu diagnosticperformanceofechocardiographyforthedetectionofacutecardiacallograftrejectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT junzheng diagnosticperformanceofechocardiographyforthedetectionofacutecardiacallograftrejectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xudongpan diagnosticperformanceofechocardiographyforthedetectionofacutecardiacallograftrejectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizhongsun diagnosticperformanceofechocardiographyforthedetectionofacutecardiacallograftrejectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis