Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers

Abstract Background Global migration has led to a sharp increase in the number of language‐discordant consultations (LDCs) in healthcare. Evidence on how healthcare providers (HCPs) meet migrant patients' needs while mitigating language barriers is lacking. Design Using purposive and snowball s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brittany M. C. Chan, Jeanine Suurmond, Julia C. M. vanWeert, Barbara C. Schouten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-02-01
Series:Health Expectations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13949
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849227387404812288
author Brittany M. C. Chan
Jeanine Suurmond
Julia C. M. vanWeert
Barbara C. Schouten
author_facet Brittany M. C. Chan
Jeanine Suurmond
Julia C. M. vanWeert
Barbara C. Schouten
author_sort Brittany M. C. Chan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Global migration has led to a sharp increase in the number of language‐discordant consultations (LDCs) in healthcare. Evidence on how healthcare providers (HCPs) meet migrant patients' needs while mitigating language barriers is lacking. Design Using purposive and snowball sampling, we recruited twenty‐seven Dutch HCPs (Mage = 45.07, SD = 11.46) and conducted semi‐structured interviews to collect qualitative, open‐ended data for identifying the communication strategies used with migrant patients in LDCs. We analysed the transcripts using deductive and inductive approaches (e.g., constant comparative method from Grounded Theory). Final pattern codes (i.e., key themes) were discussed among the research team until mutual agreement had been achieved. Results Five key themes emerged from the analyses: HCPs often ‘got‐by’ with (1) instrumental and (2) affective communication strategies used in language‐concordant consultations to start medical consultations. When some instrumental communication strategies were deemed ineffective (e.g., lingua franca, gesturing, etc.) to bridge language barriers, HCPs turned to (3) incorporating digital tools (e.g., Google Translate). When HCPs were unable to communicate with migrant patients at all, (4) informal, ad‐hoc and professional interpreters were involved. Finally, HCPs often (5) involved additional support to engage migrant patients to engage in treatment‐related behaviours. Discussion and Conclusions Our results highlight the importance of raising awareness among HCPs about using various combinations of different strategies. The development of a guideline indicating the optimal combination of communication strategies for different medical consultation goals may be useful in reshaping the current communication behaviour of HCPs in LDCs. Patient or Public Contribution HCPs were the study population involved in this qualitative study. Refugee health advisors, general practitioners and linguistic specialists (i.e., members of the Right2Health consortium) with experience with the Dutch healthcare system were involved throughout the development of this research. This includes a review of the research question, participant information sheet and interview topic guide as well as providing interpretations of the data and feedback to this manuscript.
format Article
id doaj-art-c4aea0f898d64ff181337c3d9ee5e544
institution Kabale University
issn 1369-6513
1369-7625
language English
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Expectations
spelling doaj-art-c4aea0f898d64ff181337c3d9ee5e5442025-08-23T11:53:04ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252024-02-01271n/an/a10.1111/hex.13949Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providersBrittany M. C. Chan0Jeanine Suurmond1Julia C. M. vanWeert2Barbara C. Schouten3Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Science (ASCoR) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Science (ASCoR) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Science (ASCoR) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The NetherlandsAbstract Background Global migration has led to a sharp increase in the number of language‐discordant consultations (LDCs) in healthcare. Evidence on how healthcare providers (HCPs) meet migrant patients' needs while mitigating language barriers is lacking. Design Using purposive and snowball sampling, we recruited twenty‐seven Dutch HCPs (Mage = 45.07, SD = 11.46) and conducted semi‐structured interviews to collect qualitative, open‐ended data for identifying the communication strategies used with migrant patients in LDCs. We analysed the transcripts using deductive and inductive approaches (e.g., constant comparative method from Grounded Theory). Final pattern codes (i.e., key themes) were discussed among the research team until mutual agreement had been achieved. Results Five key themes emerged from the analyses: HCPs often ‘got‐by’ with (1) instrumental and (2) affective communication strategies used in language‐concordant consultations to start medical consultations. When some instrumental communication strategies were deemed ineffective (e.g., lingua franca, gesturing, etc.) to bridge language barriers, HCPs turned to (3) incorporating digital tools (e.g., Google Translate). When HCPs were unable to communicate with migrant patients at all, (4) informal, ad‐hoc and professional interpreters were involved. Finally, HCPs often (5) involved additional support to engage migrant patients to engage in treatment‐related behaviours. Discussion and Conclusions Our results highlight the importance of raising awareness among HCPs about using various combinations of different strategies. The development of a guideline indicating the optimal combination of communication strategies for different medical consultation goals may be useful in reshaping the current communication behaviour of HCPs in LDCs. Patient or Public Contribution HCPs were the study population involved in this qualitative study. Refugee health advisors, general practitioners and linguistic specialists (i.e., members of the Right2Health consortium) with experience with the Dutch healthcare system were involved throughout the development of this research. This includes a review of the research question, participant information sheet and interview topic guide as well as providing interpretations of the data and feedback to this manuscript.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13949communication strategieshealthcare providersinterpreterslanguage‐discordant consultationsmigrant patients
spellingShingle Brittany M. C. Chan
Jeanine Suurmond
Julia C. M. vanWeert
Barbara C. Schouten
Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers
Health Expectations
communication strategies
healthcare providers
interpreters
language‐discordant consultations
migrant patients
title Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers
title_full Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers
title_fullStr Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers
title_full_unstemmed Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers
title_short Uncovering communication strategies used in language‐discordant consultations with people who are migrants: Qualitative interviews with healthcare providers
title_sort uncovering communication strategies used in language discordant consultations with people who are migrants qualitative interviews with healthcare providers
topic communication strategies
healthcare providers
interpreters
language‐discordant consultations
migrant patients
url https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13949
work_keys_str_mv AT brittanymcchan uncoveringcommunicationstrategiesusedinlanguagediscordantconsultationswithpeoplewhoaremigrantsqualitativeinterviewswithhealthcareproviders
AT jeaninesuurmond uncoveringcommunicationstrategiesusedinlanguagediscordantconsultationswithpeoplewhoaremigrantsqualitativeinterviewswithhealthcareproviders
AT juliacmvanweert uncoveringcommunicationstrategiesusedinlanguagediscordantconsultationswithpeoplewhoaremigrantsqualitativeinterviewswithhealthcareproviders
AT barbaracschouten uncoveringcommunicationstrategiesusedinlanguagediscordantconsultationswithpeoplewhoaremigrantsqualitativeinterviewswithhealthcareproviders