Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures

Background This study addresses the need for improved diagnostic tools to identify malignancy in suspicious biliary strictures. Traditional cytological morphology is often indecisive, prompting the exploration of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for enhanced sensitivity. Our aim is to evaluate NGS&...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tina L.N. Meijering, David Michaël de Jong, Swip Draijer, Marco Bruno, H. J. Dubbink, Jeroen de Jonge, Marie-Louise F. van Velthuysen, Lydi Van Driel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2687-3552
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849232789343305728
author Tina L.N. Meijering
David Michaël de Jong
Swip Draijer
Marco Bruno
H. J. Dubbink
Jeroen de Jonge
Marie-Louise F. van Velthuysen
Lydi Van Driel
author_facet Tina L.N. Meijering
David Michaël de Jong
Swip Draijer
Marco Bruno
H. J. Dubbink
Jeroen de Jonge
Marie-Louise F. van Velthuysen
Lydi Van Driel
author_sort Tina L.N. Meijering
collection DOAJ
description Background This study addresses the need for improved diagnostic tools to identify malignancy in suspicious biliary strictures. Traditional cytological morphology is often indecisive, prompting the exploration of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for enhanced sensitivity. Our aim is to evaluate NGS's additional value in classifying biliary brushes and biopsies and its impact on Clinical Decision Making (CDM). Patients and methods In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, patients were included from 2019 to 2022 in whom morphologic interpretation and NGS were performed on cytological or histological material from suspicious biliary strictures. Sensitivity and specificity of NGS were calculated for benign or atypical vs. suspicious for malignancy or malignant morphology in biliary brushes and biopsies. In addition, changes in CDM after NGS outcome were evaluated. Results In total 109 samples of 106 patients were included in the study. NGS correctly identified 42 of the 75 malignancies (56%). Sensitivity and specificity of morphology for brushes were 56% (95% CI, 43–68%) and 94% (95% CI, 79–99%), respectively. Adding NGS resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 78% (95% CI, 66–87%) and 94% (95% CI, 79–99%). For biopsies, the sensitivity and specificity of morphology were 67% (95% CI, 35–90%) and 67% (95% CI, 9–99%), adding NGS did not alter these results. The outcome of NGS resulted in a change of classification of morphology in 36% and a change in CDM in 8%. Conclusions NGS in brushes contributed to more accurate/sensitive diagnoses of malignancy than morphology alone. There was a limited impact on CDM change, but in the future NGS will undoubtedly play a bigger role when targeted therapy is incorporated in standard treatment and more sensitive NGS panels for cholangiocarcinoma are developed.
format Article
id doaj-art-c42b8b0b857348b6af419d87dbe676fb
institution Kabale University
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj-art-c42b8b0b857348b6af419d87dbe676fb2025-08-20T22:51:59ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-973610.1055/a-2687-3552Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary stricturesTina L.N. Meijering0David Michaël de Jong1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-8227Swip Draijer2Marco Bruno3H. J. Dubbink4Jeroen de Jonge5Marie-Louise F. van Velthuysen6Lydi Van Driel7Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsGastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center RotterdamPathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsGastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsPathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsSurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsPathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsGastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsBackground This study addresses the need for improved diagnostic tools to identify malignancy in suspicious biliary strictures. Traditional cytological morphology is often indecisive, prompting the exploration of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for enhanced sensitivity. Our aim is to evaluate NGS's additional value in classifying biliary brushes and biopsies and its impact on Clinical Decision Making (CDM). Patients and methods In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, patients were included from 2019 to 2022 in whom morphologic interpretation and NGS were performed on cytological or histological material from suspicious biliary strictures. Sensitivity and specificity of NGS were calculated for benign or atypical vs. suspicious for malignancy or malignant morphology in biliary brushes and biopsies. In addition, changes in CDM after NGS outcome were evaluated. Results In total 109 samples of 106 patients were included in the study. NGS correctly identified 42 of the 75 malignancies (56%). Sensitivity and specificity of morphology for brushes were 56% (95% CI, 43–68%) and 94% (95% CI, 79–99%), respectively. Adding NGS resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 78% (95% CI, 66–87%) and 94% (95% CI, 79–99%). For biopsies, the sensitivity and specificity of morphology were 67% (95% CI, 35–90%) and 67% (95% CI, 9–99%), adding NGS did not alter these results. The outcome of NGS resulted in a change of classification of morphology in 36% and a change in CDM in 8%. Conclusions NGS in brushes contributed to more accurate/sensitive diagnoses of malignancy than morphology alone. There was a limited impact on CDM change, but in the future NGS will undoubtedly play a bigger role when targeted therapy is incorporated in standard treatment and more sensitive NGS panels for cholangiocarcinoma are developed.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2687-3552
spellingShingle Tina L.N. Meijering
David Michaël de Jong
Swip Draijer
Marco Bruno
H. J. Dubbink
Jeroen de Jonge
Marie-Louise F. van Velthuysen
Lydi Van Driel
Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures
Endoscopy International Open
title Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures
title_full Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures
title_fullStr Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures
title_full_unstemmed Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures
title_short Yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures
title_sort yield of next generation sequencing in diagnostic work up of suspicious biliary strictures
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2687-3552
work_keys_str_mv AT tinalnmeijering yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures
AT davidmichaeldejong yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures
AT swipdraijer yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures
AT marcobruno yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures
AT hjdubbink yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures
AT jeroendejonge yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures
AT marielouisefvanvelthuysen yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures
AT lydivandriel yieldofnextgenerationsequencingindiagnosticworkupofsuspiciousbiliarystrictures