One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature review
Objective: The aim of this literature review was to compare one-step impression technique versus two-step impression technique regarding their dimensional accuracy. Methodology: A Medline search was conducted through PubMed and Saudi Digital Library search engine using the following terms “impressio...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Saudi Dental Journal |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905219300963 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849765062290440192 |
|---|---|
| author | Razan Alshamrani Alhanoof Aldegheishem Elzahraa Eldwakhly Mai S. Mostafa |
| author_facet | Razan Alshamrani Alhanoof Aldegheishem Elzahraa Eldwakhly Mai S. Mostafa |
| author_sort | Razan Alshamrani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: The aim of this literature review was to compare one-step impression technique versus two-step impression technique regarding their dimensional accuracy. Methodology: A Medline search was conducted through PubMed and Saudi Digital Library search engine using the following terms “impression techniques”, “conventional techniques”, “one-step”, “two-step” and “accuracy”. The search reviewed between 2008 and 20018. Twenty-nine articles were screened. Nine articles were assessed for eligibility out of which six were included. Results: Three articles found that one-step impression technique had better dimensional accuracy than two-step impression technique. While the other articles showed that two-step impression technique had better dimensional accuracy than one-step impression technique. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this review, both one-step and two-step impression techniques exhibited acceptable dimensional accuracy. There are still controversies about the accuracy of one-step impression technique versus that of two-step impression technique, so more extensive in-vivo clinical studies should be performed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c427d0fa5b8447f286a95555d9cf19d1 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1013-9052 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Saudi Dental Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-c427d0fa5b8447f286a95555d9cf19d12025-08-20T03:04:58ZengSpringerSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522019-01-0131S7210.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.035One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature reviewRazan Alshamrani0Alhanoof Aldegheishem1Elzahraa Eldwakhly2Mai S. Mostafa3College of Dentistry, PNU, Saudi ArabiaClinical Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, PNU, Saudi ArabiaCollege of Dentistry, PNU, Saudi ArabiaClinical Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, PNU, Saudi ArabiaObjective: The aim of this literature review was to compare one-step impression technique versus two-step impression technique regarding their dimensional accuracy. Methodology: A Medline search was conducted through PubMed and Saudi Digital Library search engine using the following terms “impression techniques”, “conventional techniques”, “one-step”, “two-step” and “accuracy”. The search reviewed between 2008 and 20018. Twenty-nine articles were screened. Nine articles were assessed for eligibility out of which six were included. Results: Three articles found that one-step impression technique had better dimensional accuracy than two-step impression technique. While the other articles showed that two-step impression technique had better dimensional accuracy than one-step impression technique. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this review, both one-step and two-step impression techniques exhibited acceptable dimensional accuracy. There are still controversies about the accuracy of one-step impression technique versus that of two-step impression technique, so more extensive in-vivo clinical studies should be performed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905219300963 |
| spellingShingle | Razan Alshamrani Alhanoof Aldegheishem Elzahraa Eldwakhly Mai S. Mostafa One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature review Saudi Dental Journal |
| title | One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature review |
| title_full | One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature review |
| title_fullStr | One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature review |
| title_full_unstemmed | One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature review |
| title_short | One-step versus two-step impression techniques; a literature review |
| title_sort | one step versus two step impression techniques a literature review |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905219300963 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT razanalshamrani onestepversustwostepimpressiontechniquesaliteraturereview AT alhanoofaldegheishem onestepversustwostepimpressiontechniquesaliteraturereview AT elzahraaeldwakhly onestepversustwostepimpressiontechniquesaliteraturereview AT maismostafa onestepversustwostepimpressiontechniquesaliteraturereview |