Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User Perspectives

Smart living is strongly promoted to enhance the quality of life via the application of innovative solutions, and this is driven by domain specialists and policymakers, including designers, urban planners, computer engineers, and property developers. Nonetheless, the actual user, whose views ought t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Botchway, Frank Ato Ghansah, David John Edwards, Ebenezer Kumi-Amoah, Joshua Amo-Larbi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-08-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/15/2727
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849407476324106240
author Benjamin Botchway
Frank Ato Ghansah
David John Edwards
Ebenezer Kumi-Amoah
Joshua Amo-Larbi
author_facet Benjamin Botchway
Frank Ato Ghansah
David John Edwards
Ebenezer Kumi-Amoah
Joshua Amo-Larbi
author_sort Benjamin Botchway
collection DOAJ
description Smart living is strongly promoted to enhance the quality of life via the application of innovative solutions, and this is driven by domain specialists and policymakers, including designers, urban planners, computer engineers, and property developers. Nonetheless, the actual user, whose views ought to be considered during the design and development of smart living systems, has received little attention. Thus, this study aims to identify and examine the critical smart functions to achieve smart living in smart buildings based on occupants’ perceptions. The aim is achieved using a sequential quantitative research method involving a literature review and 221 valid survey data gathered from a case of a smart student residence in Hong Kong. The method is further integrated with descriptive statistics, the Kruskal–Walli’s test, and the criticality test. The results were validated via a post-survey with related experts. Twenty-six critical smart functions for smart living were revealed, with the top three including the ability to protect personal data and information privacy, provide real-time safety and security, and the ability to be responsive to users’ needs. A need was discovered to consider the context of buildings during the design of smart living systems, and the recommendation is for professionals to understand the kind of digital technology to be integrated into a building by strongly considering the context of the building and how smart living will be achieved within it based on users’ perceptions. The study provides valuable insights into the occupants’ perceptions of critical smart features/functions for policymakers and practitioners to consider in the construction of smart living systems, specifically students’ smart buildings. This study contributes to knowledge by identifying the critical smart functions to achieve smart living based on occupants’ perceptions of smart living by considering the specific context of a smart student building facility constructed in Hong Kong.
format Article
id doaj-art-c3cc7b4f55ef4474af870b2e3ee49683
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-5309
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj-art-c3cc7b4f55ef4474af870b2e3ee496832025-08-20T03:36:03ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092025-08-011515272710.3390/buildings15152727Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User PerspectivesBenjamin Botchway0Frank Ato Ghansah1David John Edwards2Ebenezer Kumi-Amoah3Joshua Amo-Larbi4Department of Construction Technology and Management, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi AK384, GhanaSchool of Construction, Property and Surveying, College of Technology and Environment, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UKInfrastructure Futures Research Group, College of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B4 7XG, UKConsolidated Bank Ghana, Manet Tower 1st Floor, Airport City, Cantonments, Accra PMB CT 363, GhanaDepartment of Real Estate and Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong KongSmart living is strongly promoted to enhance the quality of life via the application of innovative solutions, and this is driven by domain specialists and policymakers, including designers, urban planners, computer engineers, and property developers. Nonetheless, the actual user, whose views ought to be considered during the design and development of smart living systems, has received little attention. Thus, this study aims to identify and examine the critical smart functions to achieve smart living in smart buildings based on occupants’ perceptions. The aim is achieved using a sequential quantitative research method involving a literature review and 221 valid survey data gathered from a case of a smart student residence in Hong Kong. The method is further integrated with descriptive statistics, the Kruskal–Walli’s test, and the criticality test. The results were validated via a post-survey with related experts. Twenty-six critical smart functions for smart living were revealed, with the top three including the ability to protect personal data and information privacy, provide real-time safety and security, and the ability to be responsive to users’ needs. A need was discovered to consider the context of buildings during the design of smart living systems, and the recommendation is for professionals to understand the kind of digital technology to be integrated into a building by strongly considering the context of the building and how smart living will be achieved within it based on users’ perceptions. The study provides valuable insights into the occupants’ perceptions of critical smart features/functions for policymakers and practitioners to consider in the construction of smart living systems, specifically students’ smart buildings. This study contributes to knowledge by identifying the critical smart functions to achieve smart living based on occupants’ perceptions of smart living by considering the specific context of a smart student building facility constructed in Hong Kong.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/15/2727human-centered designscritical smart functionssmart livingsmart/intelligent buildinguser perspectivesuser-centered designs
spellingShingle Benjamin Botchway
Frank Ato Ghansah
David John Edwards
Ebenezer Kumi-Amoah
Joshua Amo-Larbi
Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User Perspectives
Buildings
human-centered designs
critical smart functions
smart living
smart/intelligent building
user perspectives
user-centered designs
title Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User Perspectives
title_full Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User Perspectives
title_fullStr Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User Perspectives
title_short Critical Smart Functions for Smart Living Based on User Perspectives
title_sort critical smart functions for smart living based on user perspectives
topic human-centered designs
critical smart functions
smart living
smart/intelligent building
user perspectives
user-centered designs
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/15/2727
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminbotchway criticalsmartfunctionsforsmartlivingbasedonuserperspectives
AT frankatoghansah criticalsmartfunctionsforsmartlivingbasedonuserperspectives
AT davidjohnedwards criticalsmartfunctionsforsmartlivingbasedonuserperspectives
AT ebenezerkumiamoah criticalsmartfunctionsforsmartlivingbasedonuserperspectives
AT joshuaamolarbi criticalsmartfunctionsforsmartlivingbasedonuserperspectives