The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target Location

Saccadic latency is reduced by a temporal gap between fixation point and target, by identification of a target feature, and by movement in a new direction (inhibition of saccadic return, ISR). A simple additive model was compared with a shared resources model that predicts a three-way interaction. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David R. Hardwick, Timothy R. H. Cutmore, Trevor J. Hine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/850606
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560760607211520
author David R. Hardwick
Timothy R. H. Cutmore
Trevor J. Hine
author_facet David R. Hardwick
Timothy R. H. Cutmore
Trevor J. Hine
author_sort David R. Hardwick
collection DOAJ
description Saccadic latency is reduced by a temporal gap between fixation point and target, by identification of a target feature, and by movement in a new direction (inhibition of saccadic return, ISR). A simple additive model was compared with a shared resources model that predicts a three-way interaction. Twenty naïve participants made horizontal saccades to targets left and right of fixation in a randomised block design. There was a significant three-way interaction among the factors on saccade latency. This was revealed in a two-way interaction between feature identification and the gap versus no gap factor which was only apparent when the saccade was in the same direction as the previous saccade. No interaction was apparent when the saccade was in the opposite direction. This result supports an attentional inhibitory effect that is present during ISR to a previous location which is only partly released by the facilitative effect of feature identification and gap. Together, anticipatory error data and saccade latency interactions suggest a source of ISR at a higher level of attention, possibly localised in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and involving tonic activation.
format Article
id doaj-art-c387e970d53447dea748a2f4823e983f
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-c387e970d53447dea748a2f4823e983f2025-02-03T01:26:45ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582014-01-01201410.1155/2014/850606850606The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target LocationDavid R. Hardwick0Timothy R. H. Cutmore1Trevor J. Hine2Behavioural Basis of Health, Griffith Health Institute, and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, AustraliaBehavioural Basis of Health, Griffith Health Institute, and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, AustraliaBehavioural Basis of Health, Griffith Health Institute, and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, AustraliaSaccadic latency is reduced by a temporal gap between fixation point and target, by identification of a target feature, and by movement in a new direction (inhibition of saccadic return, ISR). A simple additive model was compared with a shared resources model that predicts a three-way interaction. Twenty naïve participants made horizontal saccades to targets left and right of fixation in a randomised block design. There was a significant three-way interaction among the factors on saccade latency. This was revealed in a two-way interaction between feature identification and the gap versus no gap factor which was only apparent when the saccade was in the same direction as the previous saccade. No interaction was apparent when the saccade was in the opposite direction. This result supports an attentional inhibitory effect that is present during ISR to a previous location which is only partly released by the facilitative effect of feature identification and gap. Together, anticipatory error data and saccade latency interactions suggest a source of ISR at a higher level of attention, possibly localised in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and involving tonic activation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/850606
spellingShingle David R. Hardwick
Timothy R. H. Cutmore
Trevor J. Hine
The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target Location
Journal of Ophthalmology
title The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target Location
title_full The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target Location
title_fullStr The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target Location
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target Location
title_short The Influence of Attention and Target Identification on Saccadic Eye Movements Depends on Prior Target Location
title_sort influence of attention and target identification on saccadic eye movements depends on prior target location
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/850606
work_keys_str_mv AT davidrhardwick theinfluenceofattentionandtargetidentificationonsaccadiceyemovementsdependsonpriortargetlocation
AT timothyrhcutmore theinfluenceofattentionandtargetidentificationonsaccadiceyemovementsdependsonpriortargetlocation
AT trevorjhine theinfluenceofattentionandtargetidentificationonsaccadiceyemovementsdependsonpriortargetlocation
AT davidrhardwick influenceofattentionandtargetidentificationonsaccadiceyemovementsdependsonpriortargetlocation
AT timothyrhcutmore influenceofattentionandtargetidentificationonsaccadiceyemovementsdependsonpriortargetlocation
AT trevorjhine influenceofattentionandtargetidentificationonsaccadiceyemovementsdependsonpriortargetlocation